Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 10:00 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On 07/08/2010 04:39 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > Can you please clarify this one? The sub packages depend on the -common,
> > which has the LICENSE etc. docs. Is this because the main package
> > doesn't Requires: -common?
> 
> Caveat: I have not looked at your specific spec, so I am hypothesizing here.
> 
> Lets say that your beteckna-fonts SRPM generates these binary RPMS:
> 
> - beteckna-fonts
> - beteckna-fonts-common
> - beteckna-fonts-shiny
> 
> If both "beteckna-fonts" and "beteckna-fonts-shiny" depend (either
> implicitly or explicitly) on "beteckna-fonts-common", and
> "beteckna-fonts-common" has the license texts in it, you do not need to
> do anything.
> 
> If "beteckna-fonts" (or "beteckna-fonts-shiny") does not depend (either
> implicitly or explicitly) on "beteckna-fonts-common", then you will need
> to add copies of the license text to that package.
> 
> ~spot

okay, 

got it. thanks!!

Ankur


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux