On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 19:21 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > Essentially using a different flag is just re-using the code used to > flag a package as critpath-approved only with a different name. > Therefore it should not need that much more effort. > > Btw. using the "path of least resistance" to implement policy > changes seems to be what makes the new workflows suck for package > maintainers, e.g. with the change in place using a auto-karma value of 1 > will become 0. I'm with Till, this particular bit seems to be a hack too far. I'd say until we can get a proper mechanism in place, the most the test should do with current Bodhi is file a comment saying the depcheck test passed, with 0 karma (not +1). -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
