Re: depcheck test (was Re: measuring success)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Till Maas wrote:
> Btw. using the "path of least resistance" to implement policy
> changes seems to be what makes the new workflows suck for package
> maintainers, e.g. with the change in place using a auto-karma value of 1
> will become 0.

That would be a good thing! It'd make all those requirements of karma 1 
(which is also implied in the critpath process which needs an extra karma 
point IN ADDITION TO the proventesters approval, as if a proven tester could 
not be trusted :-/ ) actually bearable.

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux