On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 22:21 +0000, Ben Boeckel wrote: > In article <1278968533.22421.0.camel@rosebud> you wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 15:51 -0500, Clark Williams wrote: > >> I'm thinking we need to catch this early in mock. Any suggestions on > >> how we should detect that we're on a 32-bit arch and the selected > >> config is 64 bit? Brute force is just to have a dictionary that rejects > >> certain configs. > >> > > > > The list is the only way I could come up with to determine what could > > run/build on what. > > > > -sv > > How about an arch-dependent package that contains the 64bit configs? > mock can then have an x86_64 Requires: on that package. Could probably > do the same with ppc and other architectures that don't have > cross-compilers available. It can't install the pkgs sanely, though - b/c it doesn't know how to run the arch's pre and post install scripts (from the pkg) it's not just about compiling - it is also about setting up the chroot. -sv -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel