Re: Developers of packages please pay attention to selinux labeling.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 02:53 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/14/2010 02:46 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > The test case for validating this criterion is:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_desktop_error_checks
> >
> > note that it doesn't test non-default package sets, and doesn't test
> > actively *running* applications, only booting to a default desktop.

> I think we need to change that to actively run and test the default
> applications that are accessible from the menu. 

That's sort of covered in
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_desktop_menus . I didn't
explicitly mention the apps should run without AVCs, but I would
probably have considered it a blocker bug if I'd actually hit a case
where an AVC popped up when doing that test. We could discuss adding it
explicitly to that case and the criteria, I guess.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux