On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 03:11:44PM +0100, Christopher Brown wrote: > > > > As long as you give us a heads up we can prevent these types of blowups. > > Since this policy is shared between yum, packagekit > > Whilst I appreciate your huge efforts to provide users with a more > secure system, you need to realise that SELinux as it stands at the > moment is utterly broken. As you clearly don't think this is the case, > please spend some time in userland before beating on developers for > not caring about this. On the other hand, I cannot understand why packagers submit packages that have no chance to work in default Fedora settings, with SELinux in Enforcing mode. There are sometimes such obvious errors and missing labels that I cannot imagine not catching an audit message when program fails to even start! There should be no excuses, especially when asking Dan is so simple and he is always patient and helpful. -- Tomasz Torcz ,,If you try to upissue this patchset I shall be seeking xmpp: zdzichubg@xxxxxxxxx an IP-routable hand grenade.'' -- Andrew Morton (LKML)
Attachment:
pgphcgVSKBYgx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
