On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 00:00 -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 07/08/2010 06:44 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > > So I'd package up stuff, do a koji build, download it, run my > > representative test suite, upload the result and do another build. > > As Roland wrote, if you cannot provide a self-contained RPM build > process it'll be tricky setting up the environment and then collection > the files. And then you also have to be sure you're using *exactly* the > same build environment for the second compile path. That's something > which I also don't see koji providing. A new build root will be > produced from the then-up-to-date RPMs listed as BuildRequires. There > is no bookkeeping of the RPMs used in the first build. If anything is > different you won't get the desired effect. > > > But this doesn't mean no package can use PGO. Those where the workload > runs can be performed on the build machines it's reasonably easy to > perform the optimization. This should, for instance, be done for all > scripting languages. These packages hopefully contain test suites which > can serve as the beginning of a workload body. Additional code could be > collected in new packages (like, for instance, bash-workload) which > could be added as BuildRequires if compiling with PGO is wanted. Good idea - though I'm worried that test suites may give a skewed view of the branches. Python has a benchmarking suite that tries to reflect real-world workloads, and I've filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613045 "RFE: Add profile guided optimization to our builds of Python 2" and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613046 "RFE: Add profile guided optimization to our builds of Python 3" Help doing this for Python would be welcome, though it may be better to focus on python3 for now, until after the 2.6 to 2.7 transition is done. Dave -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
