On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Carl Gaudreault <carl.gaudreault@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531464#c29 I appreciate the effort to be more explicit in your reasoning by adding an additional comment in response to this out-of-ticket dicussion. That being said. I really really think that its only appropriate for someone who has talked specifically to the maintainers of a package to make that sort of wontfix closure judgement and to do the closure. I do not think its best practise for others to attempt to act as good Samaritans to WONTFIX/CANTFIX closures of this nature. I do not understand the reasoning for closing bugs just to avoid ABRT adding CC's. Why are additional CC's a bad thing for this bug? One of those additional CC's might actually be able to pin down the fix! Yes its a widespread problem, but because its a widespread problem doesn't mean you just shutdown the bug. I don't see how its appropriate for anyone both one of the listed maintainers to decide that closing a bug WONTFIX because there is _TOO MUCH_ ABRT activity. I just don't get the rationale. Did you speak with Brian in a private conversation or another maintainer about this at some point? -jef -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
