2010/7/11 Rudolf Kastl <che666@xxxxxxxxx>: > 2010/7/11 Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx>: >> Matt McCutchen wrote: >>> If you're suggesting that an upstream bug report is information needed >>> to understand a Fedora bug, that's absurd. It's a step taken to resolve >>> the bug. Would you mark a bug INSUFFICIENT_DATA because the reporter >>> didn't provide a patch? >> >> Providing a patch is actually hard. Reporting a bug in the upstream bug >> tracker is just a matter of filling out the form, if the reporter refuses to >> do that, it's only pure laziness. > > well thing is... if you are constantly reporting bugs vs stuff we have > in it is not possible to maintain like a 1000 upstream bugzilla > accounts. thats why there is a maintainer that in the best case works > close with upstream anyways and has more insight on what happens with > the project. just my personal point of view. ... and a valid fix from my pov to lower the overhead for the maintainer would be to make it easier and less effort to get the stuff forwarded upstream for him. a one-click forward upstream button would be a nice thing and it is defintely technically possible. kind regards, Rudolf Kastl > > kind regards, > rudolf kastl > >> >> Kevin Kofler >> >> -- >> devel mailing list >> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >> > -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
