Re: Should GnuPG 1.4.x be revived?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/13/2010 05:52 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Having gpg1 and gpg2 seems reasonable to me.
>
> Note, though, that the problem is slightly more limited in scope.  At least
> with vim, if you have an X display, gpg2 will invoke the graphical pinentry
> where you can enter your passphrase and go about your business.

It's the same with Emacs.

> Plain console, remote sessions that are not allowed to send the graphical
> window back to the local session, and systems that don't have the graphical
> pinentry programs installed will all experience this problem, though.

Yes, exactly.

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux