Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/08/2010 03:52 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Can you elaborate the cases below?
> 
> I can't spot anything wrong with them:
> 
>> > [corsepiu] gtkglext: gtkglext-libs-1.2.0-10.fc12.x86_64
> # repoquery -ql 'gtkglext-libs'
> ...
> /usr/share/doc/gtkglext-libs-1.2.0/AUTHORS
> /usr/share/doc/gtkglext-libs-1.2.0/COPYING
> /usr/share/doc/gtkglext-libs-1.2.0/COPYING.LIB
> /usr/share/doc/gtkglext-libs-1.2.0/ChangeLog
> /usr/share/doc/gtkglext-libs-1.2.0/README
> /usr/share/doc/gtkglext-libs-1.2.0/TODO
> 
>> > [corsepiu] OpenSceneGraph: OpenThreads-2.8.3-1.fc14.x86_64
> # repoquery -ql OpenThreads.i686
> ...
> /usr/share/doc/OpenThreads-2.8.2/AUTHORS.txt
> /usr/share/doc/OpenThreads-2.8.2/LICENSE.txt
> /usr/share/doc/OpenThreads-2.8.2/NEWS.txt
> /usr/share/doc/OpenThreads-2.8.2/README.txt
> 
> Both are cases where the binary base packages' names differ from the 
> srpm name.

This fact is why they got flagged. Both of these are clearly false
positives, thank you for checking them.

~spot
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux