Re: Make pkgdb grant co-maintainer status automatically? (was Re: Non-responsive maintainer fast track procedure for libsndfile)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kevin Fenzi wrote:

> On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 13:39:43 +0100
> "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> If #maintainers == 0 then the package is either just sitting there (as
>> long as there are no serious bugs), or is being best-effort maintained
>> by provenpackagers, at least until that becomes a burden and only then
>> should the package be dropped.
> 
> If some provenpackager want's to maintain it, why don't they take
> ownership?

Because I can fix the occasional broken dependency, but I can't commit to 
actually maintain hundreds of packages. For example, the bugmail would flood 
me, I couldn't fix any of those bugs anyway, only the complete showstoppers 
(i.e. broken deps and MAYBE (!) FTBFS).

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux