On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 16:29 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> [nphilipp] gimp: 2:gimp-libs-2.6.9-5.fc14.x86_64
fixed in 2.6.10-2.fc14
> [nphilipp] xsane: xsane-common-0.997-8.fc14.x86_64
fixed in 0.997-9.fc14
> [nphilipp] extremetuxracer: extremetuxracer-common-0.4-3.fc12.noarch
> [nphilipp] ufraw: ufraw-common-0.17-1.fc14.x86_64
False positives, possibly tripped up by non-obvious use of RPM macros:
...
Requires: extremetuxracer-common = %{?epoch:%{epoch}:}%{version}-%{release}
...
...
%if %{with splitpackage}
Requires: ufraw-common = %{?epoch:%{epoch}:}%{version}-%{release}
...
%files %{?spkg:common} -f %{name}.lang
%defattr(-, root, root, -)
%doc COPYING README
...
Did you check spec files or generated binary RPMs? I guess checking the
latter would avoid most of the false positives.
Nils
--
Nils Philippsen "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase
Red Hat a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty
nils@xxxxxxxxxx nor Safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759
PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
