Re: Make pkgdb grant co-maintainer status automatically? (was Re: Non-responsive maintainer fast track procedure for libsndfile)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 10:54:29AM -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 13:39:43 +0100, Richard wrote:
> >
> >> So I think it's valid for packages to have 0, 1, 2, or more
> >> maintainers.
> >
> > Why 0? Who will be notified about bugzilla tickets? Who will receive
> > mail sent to the PACKAGE-owner Fedora e-mail alias?
> >
> 
> Some mailing list like dumping-ground@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx I am sure
> someone can come up with a better name.

We can use "uberpackagers" ;-) or maybe "package-monkeys", make it a SIG
and then it is afaik already covered by Fedora procedures, because a SIG
or group of packagers can own a package, like e.g. the lvm-team.

Orcan, Richard, who else is in?

Regards
Till

Attachment: pgpmDzyXd6tn5.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux