On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 13:01 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 7/7/10 5:43 AM, James Laska wrote: > > If there is a solution that addresses the problems identified during > > F-13, and it can be implemented in *short* time. It would be > > compelling. I'm a fan of solving problems with tooling, but I'm not > > convinced that is where our big investment should be for the upcoming > > release, or that it fully addresses the problems encountered during > > F-13. > > I can think of one quick and simple way of doing this. > > When we review a bug and accept it on the blocker list, we use a keyword > of "ACCEPTED" or some such. That way any bug without the word is > assumed to just be proposed and not yet accepted. A bit more manual > work and a bit harder to query, but it still nets the result of > differentiating between bugs that are proposed and bugs that are > accepted blockers. > > Thoughts? keywords we have to ask to be added to the system, I'm not keen on doing that as a temp hack. Whiteboard space is freeform, though. We could just pick a word to use in the whiteboard space - AcceptedBlocker, for e.g. - and go with that. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
