On 07/06/2010 12:15 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 19:55:27 +0200 > Till Maas<opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 10:33:04PM +0200, Till Maas wrote: >>> On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 12:48:43PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >>> >>>> I have updated the page. >>>> >>>> Does it look clear now? Re-wording or tweaks very welcome. >>>> >>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_acceptance_criteria >>> >>> Btw. does Bodhi really work the way it is said there? What happens >>> if there are +1 and -1 karma values for an critpath update? >>> According to the criteria, -1 karma does not have any impact at all >>> except for all other updates, because they contain a karma >>> threshold. >> >> Interestingly the first critpath update I saw with f-e-k is not >> approved but should be according to the criteria: >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2010-9850 > > It doesn't have enough karma... it got: > > -1, +1, +1, for a total of 1. > > So, I guess it's not going to push without hitting +2. > > I've asked Luke to comment here and your parent post about how things > work, as I would love to know too. ;) Right now for a critical path update to gain approval, it must have a net karma of at least 2, including a +1 from a proventester, and +1 from another authenticated user. This is the behavior that was implemented and utilized during the No Frozen Rawhide pre-release stage of F13. If we want to change this behavior, that's fine with me. Let's discuss alternative solutions. luke -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
