Re: Developers of packages please pay attention to selinux labeling.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Once upon a time, Christopher Brown <snecklifter@xxxxxxxxx> said:
> Whilst I appreciate your huge efforts to provide users with a more
> secure system, you need to realise that SELinux as it stands at the
> moment is utterly broken.

It works for a lot of people, so I would hardly call it "utterly
broken".

> I understand wanting SELinux checks for *EL but for Fedora? Seriously?

Since the major security risk is at the desktop, and Fedora is more
targeted at the desktop than RHEL, SELinux is IMHO more important in
Fedora than RHEL.
-- 
Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux