On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 11:47 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > On 07/09/2010 11:32 AM, seth vidal wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 11:25 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > >> On 07/08/2010 05:35 PM, Paul wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>>> [pfj] xmms: 1:xmms-libs-1.2.11-11.20071117cvs.fc14.x86_64 > >>> > >>> Unless something very odd is going on here, xmms-libs does have the > >>> COPYING file included (just checked the spec file). > >>> > >>> Could it be that there is a problem with the build sys on x86_64 which > >>> is causing it to miss? > >> > >> No, it is simply that it isn't sanely scriptable to check to see if that > >> package actually has license text, so the script generated a list of > >> "probable" subpackage candidates to be manually checked. > >> > > I can add a few heuristics scanning the filelists of any pkg which is a > > potential positive - looking for COPYING* or LICENSE* it won't be > > perfect but I bet it'll reduce the false positives - unfortunately it > > will create some false negatives too. > > Sure. Better than nothing. > done. http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/misc/indy-rockers-with-false-positives-marked.txt and script updated here: http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/misc/indy-pkgs-for-spot.py -sv -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
