Till Maas (opensource@xxxxxxxxx) said: > Since these groups do not share a common prefix unique to all critical > path comps groups, I want to propose to change this. E.g. there could > be > a) a critical-path-core group with the same contents as core > b) or with only a groupreq on core > c) or the critical-path-base group could get a groupreq on core. groupreqs are not a functional item. If we assume that 'core' is the only exception, is it really that bad? Bill -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
