Fedora Development Discussion
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: Official archiver of Fedora mailing lists shows e-mails with one day delay!
- From: Farhad Mohammadi Majd
- Official archiver of Fedora mailing lists shows e-mails with one day delay!
- From: Farhad Mohammadi Majd
- Re: Broken dependencies: FreeSOLID
- Re: Broken dependencies: FreeSOLID
- Official archiver of Fedora mailing lists shows e-mails with one day delay!
- From: Farhad Mohammadi Majd
- Re: Broken dependencies: FreeSOLID
- Broken dependencies: FreeSOLID
- Reliability test for hard drives and SSD
- Re: Kernel marking files in /boot as %ghost
- Re: News in opencv package
- Re: News in opencv package
- Fedora 28-20180302.n.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: why do I keep getting Broken dependencies: nfs-ganesha emails
- Re: <DKIM> Re: Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes
- Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?
- why do I keep getting Broken dependencies: nfs-ganesha emails
- Re: BuildError: package PKGNAME not in list for tag f29-pending
- Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?
- Re: Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes
- Re: News in opencv package
- Fedora 28 compose report: 20180302.n.0 changes
- From: Fedora Branched Report
- Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?
- Re: News in opencv package
- Re: Appstream metadata compose failures
- Re: News in opencv package
- Re: News in opencv package
- Re: News in opencv package
- Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?
- Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?
- Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?
- Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2018-03-02)
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: <DKIM> Re: Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes
- Re: News in opencv package
- Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?
- From: Farhad Mohammadi Majd
- Re: Appstream metadata compose failures
- Re: Appstream metadata compose failures
- Re: Appstream metadata compose failures
- Re: Appstream metadata compose failures
- [HEAD UP] soname bump Re: News in opencv package
- Re: Appstream metadata compose failures
- Re: Appstream metadata compose failures
- Re: Appstream metadata compose failures
- From: Robert-André Mauchin
- Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?
- Re: Call for users of darkserver
- Re: Kernel marking files in /boot as %ghost
- Re: Appstream metadata compose failures
- Re: Appstream metadata compose failures
- From: Robert-André Mauchin
- Re: 389-ds-base and freeipa on 32 bit arches
- Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?
- From: Farhad Mohammadi Majd
- Re: Need assistance to build openvdb for both Blender and LuxRender
- Re: Need assistance to build openvdb for both Blender and LuxRender
- Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?
- News in opencv package
- Appstream metadata compose failures
- Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?
- Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?
- Re: <DKIM> Re: Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes
- BuildError: package PKGNAME not in list for tag f29-pending
- Re: <DKIM> Re: Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes
- Re: [RFC] Packages which are not installable (obsoleted by other pacakges)
- Kernel marking files in /boot as %ghost
- Need assistance to build openvdb for both Blender and LuxRender
- Re: Add ability to check ABI compliance from fedpkg?
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Fedora 28-20180301.n.1 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes
- Fedora 28 compose report: 20180301.n.1 changes
- From: Fedora Branched Report
- Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?
- Re: [RFC] Packages which are not installable (obsoleted by other pacakges)
- [Test-Announce] Fedora 28 Branched 20180301.n.1 nightly compose nominated for testing
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: Test gating enabled in Bodhi
- Re: [RFC] Packages which are not installable (obsoleted by other pacakges)
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes
- Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180301.n.0 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- Re: Call for users of darkserver
- Re: can't install FreeSOLID-devel on F28
- Re: New "tests" namespace to share test code
- Re: Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes
- Re: can't install FreeSOLID-devel on F28
- From: Robert-André Mauchin
- Re: New "tests" namespace to share test code
- Re: can't install FreeSOLID-devel on F28
- Re: qarte - compilation fails
- Re: Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes
- Re: Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- [RFC] Packages which are not installable (obsoleted by other pacakges)
- Re: qarte - compilation fails
- Re: qarte - compilation fails
- From: Charalampos Stratakis
- Re: Proposal: new really minimal 'System' group (Core reduced more)
- Re: Test gating enabled in Bodhi
- Proposal: new really minimal 'System' group (Core reduced more)
- can't install FreeSOLID-devel on F28
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: New "tests" namespace to share test code
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes
- Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?
- From: Farhad Mohammadi Majd
- Re: New "tests" namespace to share test code
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Fedora Rawhide-20180301.n.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes
- Re: New "tests" namespace to share test code
- Re: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find /usr/lib64/libpthread_nonshared.a
- Re: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find /usr/lib64/libpthread_nonshared.a
- /usr/bin/ld: cannot find /usr/lib64/libpthread_nonshared.a
- Re: News in net-snmp package
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Exclude paths for elfdeps dependency generator
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- qarte - compilation fails
- Re: Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: <DKIM> Re: <DKIM> Re: <DKIM> Re: <DKIM> Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Open Seats on the Fedora Packaging Committee
- Open Seats on the Fedora Packaging Committee
- Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2018-03-01 17:00 UTC)
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes (was: Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21))
- Re: <DKIM> Re: <DKIM> Re: <DKIM> Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: Test gating enabled in Bodhi
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Test gating enabled in Bodhi
- Re: march VFAD for the atomic working group
- Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2018-03-02)
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- march VFAD for the atomic working group
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: News in net-snmp package
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- packmol license change
- Re: News in net-snmp package
- Re: <DKIM> Re: <DKIM> Re: <DKIM> Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: <DKIM> Re: <DKIM> Re: <DKIM> Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: <DKIM> Re: <DKIM> Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: <DKIM> Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: <DKIM> Re: <DKIM> Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: <DKIM> Re: <DKIM> Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: <DKIM> Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: <DKIM> Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: <DKIM> Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 27.93
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: Review Request: swift-lang (Apple's Swift programming language)
- Re: Trying out More Go Packaging: Bugs and Questions
- From: Robert-André Mauchin
- Review Request: swift-lang (Apple's Swift programming language)
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: runroot changing during the course of a rawhide pungi run
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Add ability to check ABI compliance from fedpkg?
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Trying out More Go Packaging: Bugs and Questions
- From: Robert-André Mauchin
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: <DKIM> Re: <DKIM> Trying out More Go Packaging: Bugs and Questions
- Re: News in net-snmp package
- Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Multilib issue: apitrace-libs.i686 version mismatches apitrace-libs.x86_64 on F27
- Re: <DKIM> Trying out More Go Packaging: Bugs and Questions
- From: Robert-André Mauchin
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- From: Nathanael D. Noblet
- News in net-snmp package
- Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2
- [package review] f28-backgrounds ready for review
- Re: <DKIM> Trying out More Go Packaging: Bugs and Questions
- Re: Package stops supporting python 2.7 in latest version, what to do now
- From: Charalampos Stratakis
- Re: <DKIM> Trying out More Go Packaging: Bugs and Questions
- Re: fedora28 and strong crypto settings
- From: Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
- Trying out More Go Packaging: Bugs and Questions
- Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2
- Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2
- Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Office Hours
- REMINDER: Software Translation Deadline in 1 week
- F28 Software String Freeze is today
- Fedora 28 Spins page: spin/labs owners please test
- REMINDER: Fedora 28 Change Checkpoint: 100% Code Complete Deadline & Beta Freeze in 1 week
- Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Office Hours
- Re: runroot changing during the course of a rawhide pungi run
- Re: runroot changing during the course of a rawhide pungi run
- Re: Help for fixing %install spec file section (Error make: *** No rule to make target 'install'. Stop.)
- Re: Help for fixing %install spec file section (Error make: *** No rule to make target 'install'. Stop.)
- Re: Help for fixing %install spec file section (Error make: *** No rule to make target 'install'. Stop.)
- Re: fedora28 and strong crypto settings
- COPR src.fp.o auto-rebuilds
- Re: fedora28 and strong crypto settings
- [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Office Hours
- [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Office Hours
- Re: need sponsorship for package
- Re: Help needed with new segfaults in frame unwinding under gcc8
- need sponsorship for package
- Re: Help needed with new segfaults in frame unwinding under gcc8
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Help for fixing %install spec file section (Error make: *** No rule to make target 'install'. Stop.)
- Re: Help for fixing %install spec file section (Error make: *** No rule to make target 'install'. Stop.)
- Re: Fwd: [Fedora Update] [CRITPATH] [comment] soxr-0.1.3-1.fc27
- Re: Help needed with new segfaults in frame unwinding under gcc8
- Fwd: [Fedora Update] [CRITPATH] [comment] soxr-0.1.3-1.fc27
- Re: Help for fixing %install spec file section (Error make: *** No rule to make target 'install'. Stop.)
- Help for fixing %install spec file section (Error make: *** No rule to make target 'install'. Stop.)
- Re: Using LTO for Fedora package builds
- Re: Lazarus vs. FPC updates
- Re: Using LTO for Fedora package builds
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: Lazarus vs. FPC updates
- Re: fedora28 and strong crypto settings
- Re: Using LTO for Fedora package builds
- Re: fedora28 and strong crypto settings
- Re: fedora28 and strong crypto settings
- Re: fedora28 and strong crypto settings
- Re: fedora28 and strong crypto settings
- fedora28 and strong crypto settings
- From: Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2
- Re: Using LTO for Fedora package builds
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- News in netpbm package.
- Re: Lazarus vs. FPC updates
- Re: Lazarus vs. FPC updates
- Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2
- Re: Lazarus vs. FPC updates
- Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2
- Re: Lazarus vs. FPC updates
- Re: Using LTO for Fedora package builds
- Re: Multilib issue: apitrace-libs.i686 version mismatches apitrace-libs.x86_64 on F27
- Re: Lazarus vs. FPC updates
- Re: Lazarus vs. FPC updates
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2
- Re: Lazarus vs. FPC updates
- Re: Lazarus vs. FPC updates
- Re: Lazarus vs. FPC updates
- Lazarus vs. FPC updates
- Re: F29 Self Contained Change: FedoraScientific VagrantBox
- Re: F29 Self Contained Change: FedoraScientific VagrantBox
- Re: Using LTO for Fedora package builds
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: Using LTO for Fedora package builds
- Re: gc-7.6.4 to rawhide, *no* abi bump
- Re: gc-7.6.4 to rawhide, *no* abi bump
- Re: Using LTO for Fedora package builds
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: [HEADS UP] Replacing %post/%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
- Re: New "tests" namespace to share test code
- Re: Using LTO for Fedora package builds
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: Using LTO for Fedora package builds
- Re: Using LTO for Fedora package builds
- Re: Using LTO for Fedora package builds
- Re: Using LTO for Fedora package builds
- Re: Using LTO for Fedora package builds
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: Using LTO for Fedora package builds
- Re: New "tests" namespace to share test code
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: Using LTO for Fedora package builds
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: New "tests" namespace to share test code
- Re: New "tests" namespace to share test code
- Using LTO for Fedora package builds
- Re: [Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2018-02-26 blocker review meeting
- [Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2018-02-26 blocker review meeting
- [Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2018-02-26 Fedora QA Meeting
- Re: gc-7.6.4 to rawhide, *no* abi bump
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: gc-7.6.4 to rawhide, *no* abi bump
- Re: Change to linker flags injection (#1548397)
- Review swaps
- From: Robert-André Mauchin
- looking for a new maintainer for closure-compiler
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: Change to linker flags injection (#1548397)
- Re: Change to linker flags injection (#1548397)
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: Change to linker flags injection (#1548397)
- Re: unresponsive maintainer 'jamatos'
- Re: Change to linker flags injection (#1548397)
- Change to linker flags injection (#1548397)
- Re: Fedora mass rebuild 2018
- xboxdrv package left
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: Fedora mass rebuild 2018
- Re: Fedora mass rebuild 2018
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: Package stops supporting python 2.7 in latest version, what to do now
- Re: Pull requests for compat-gcc-34
- Re: Help needed with new segfaults in frame unwinding under gcc8
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: 389-ds-base and freeipa on 32 bit arches
- Re: Help needed with new segfaults in frame unwinding under gcc8
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Help needed with new segfaults in frame unwinding under gcc8
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Pagure - Can't remove yourself from a project if not an admin?
- Re: Help needed with new segfaults in frame unwinding under gcc8
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Help needed with new segfaults in frame unwinding under gcc8
- Re: Help needed with new segfaults in frame unwinding under gcc8
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Enable dbus-broker
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: Help needed with new segfaults in frame unwinding under gcc8
- Re: Help needed with new segfaults in frame unwinding under gcc8
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: libtool and LDFLAGS build flags injection
- Re: Fedora mass rebuild 2018
- Re: 389-ds-base and freeipa on 32 bit arches
- Re: 389-ds-base and freeipa on 32 bit arches
- Re: libtool and LDFLAGS build flags injection
- Re: Help needed with new segfaults in frame unwinding under gcc8
- Re: 389-ds-base and freeipa on 32 bit arches
- Re: libtool and LDFLAGS build flags injection
- 389-ds-base and freeipa on 32 bit arches
- Re: Help needed with new segfaults in frame unwinding under gcc8
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: unresponsive maintainer procedure for konradm (Conrad Meyer)
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: libtool and LDFLAGS build flags injection
- Re: unresponsive maintainer procedure for konradm (Conrad Meyer)
- unresponsive maintainer procedure for konradm (Conrad Meyer)
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: libtool and LDFLAGS build flags injection
- Re: Fedora mass rebuild 2018
- Summary/Minutes for today's FESCo Meeting (2018-02-23)
- libtool and LDFLAGS build flags injection
- Re: Fedora mass rebuild 2018
- Re: Fedora mass rebuild 2018
- cfitsio update to 3.420 with so version bump
- Re: Fedora mass rebuild 2018
- Re: Help needed with new segfaults in frame unwinding under gcc8
- How to package a gnome-shell-extension default on?
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: Help needed with new segfaults in frame unwinding under gcc8
- Re: Pull requests for compat-gcc-34
- Re: "libcryptopp update to 6.1.0 with ABI change"
- Re: [modularity] fedora/linux/modular 404
- Re: New "tests" namespace to share test code
- Re: New "tests" namespace to share test code
- Re: Fedora mass rebuild 2018
- runroot changing during the course of a rawhide pungi run
- Re: Help needed with new segfaults in frame unwinding under gcc8
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Help needed with new segfaults in frame unwinding under gcc8
- Re: [modularity] fedora/linux/modular 404
- Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2018-02-23)
- Re: Help needed with new segfaults in frame unwinding under gcc8
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: [modularity] fedora/linux/modular 404
- Re: Help needed with new segfaults in frame unwinding under gcc8
- Re: Fedora mass rebuild 2018
- Re: New "tests" namespace to share test code
- Re: Package stops supporting python 2.7 in latest version, what to do now
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Fwd: Broken dependencies: rust-chan
- Re: Fwd: Broken dependencies: rust-chan
- Fedora 28 compose report: 20180221.n.0 changes
- From: Fedora Branched Report
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Fedora mass rebuild 2018
- Help needed with new segfaults in frame unwinding under gcc8
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: Pull requests for compat-gcc-34
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- [modularity] fedora/linux/modular 404
- "libcryptopp update to 6.1.0 with ABI change"
- Re: Package stops supporting python 2.7 in latest version, what to do now
- Re: Package stops supporting python 2.7 in latest version, what to do now
- Re: Package stops supporting python 2.7 in latest version, what to do now
- Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2
- Package stops supporting python 2.7 in latest version, what to do now
- Orphening ncftp
- Re: Outdated rawhide packages
- Re: Fedora 28 Mass Branching
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: Fedora 28 Mass Branching
- Outdated rawhide packages
- Re: BSD 2-Clause license
- Re: Fedora 28 Mass Branching
- orphaned ath_info
- Re: <DKIM> Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: Fedora 28 Mass Branching
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: Multilib issue: apitrace-libs.i686 version mismatches apitrace-libs.x86_64 on F27
- Re: Fedora 28 Mass Branching
- From: Robert-André Mauchin
- Re: Multilib issue: apitrace-libs.i686 version mismatches apitrace-libs.x86_64 on F27
- Re: Fedora 28 Mass Branching
- Multilib issue: apitrace-libs.i686 version mismatches apitrace-libs.x86_64 on F27
- Orphaning procedure for mMass
- Re: Fedora 28 Mass Branching
- Re: new pagure repo is not accepted due to different e-mail addresses.
- Re: <DKIM> Re: Dynamically-generated C stored in SVN is breaking our distribution because life is awful (was Re: F28 System Wide Change: GCC8)
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [HEADS UP] No more gnupg2 in buildroot
- Re: [HEADS UP] No more gnupg2 in buildroot
- Re: [HEADS UP] No more gnupg2 in buildroot
- Re: [HEADS UP] No more gnupg2 in buildroot
- Re: Fedora 28 Mass Branching
- Re: [HEADS UP] No more gnupg2 in buildroot
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28
- Schedule for Wednesday's FPC Meeting (2018-02-21 18:00 UTC)
- Fedora 28 Mass Branching
- Re: [HEADS UP] No more gnupg2 in buildroot
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- From: Nathanael D. Noblet
- libsamplerate license change
- Re: Test gating enabled in Bodhi
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: Test gating enabled in Bodhi
- From: Alexander Ploumistos
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: Test gating enabled in Bodhi
- From: Alexander Ploumistos
- Re: [HEADS UP] No more gnupg2 in buildroot
- Re: Test gating enabled in Bodhi
- Re: gc-7.6.4 to rawhide, *no* abi bump
- Re: [HEADS UP] No more gnupg2 in buildroot
- Re: Vim: removing %{_libdir}/vim from vim-filesystem
- Re: <DKIM> Re: Dynamically-generated C stored in SVN is breaking our distribution because life is awful (was Re: F28 System Wide Change: GCC8)
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: gc-7.6.2 to rawhide, abi bump
- Re: Test gating enabled in Bodhi
- Re: Test gating enabled in Bodhi
- From: Alexander Ploumistos
- Re: dnf: Can't tell me what is pulling in a dependency?
- Re: F28 System Wide Change: GCC8
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- gc-7.6.2 to rawhide, abi bump
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Fedora Rawhide-20180220.n.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: Vim: removing %{_libdir}/vim from vim-filesystem
- Vim: removing %{_libdir}/vim from vim-filesystem
- Exclude paths for elfdeps dependency generator
- Re: Test gating enabled in Bodhi
- Add link to cvedetail.com in CVE bugs?
- Modularity Working Group IRC Meeting Minutes (2018-02-20)
- Re: Test gating enabled in Bodhi
- From: Alexander Ploumistos
- Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180220.n.0 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- REMINDER: F28 Software String Freeze in one week
- Re: new pagure repo is not accepted due to different e-mail addresses.
- Re: new pagure repo is not accepted due to different e-mail addresses.
- Fedora 28 Change Checkpoint: Completion deadline (testable)
- rpm-ostree v2018.3 and ostree v2018.2
- [HEADS UP] No more gnupg2 in buildroot
- Re: new pagure repo is not accepted due to different e-mail addresses.
- Re: new pagure repo is not accepted due to different e-mail addresses.
- Re: dnf: Can't tell me what is pulling in a dependency?
- Re: F28 System Wide Change: Make authselect default tool instead of authconfig
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: new pagure repo is not accepted due to different e-mail addresses.
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Re: new pagure repo is not accepted due to different e-mail addresses.
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: <DKIM> Re: Dynamically-generated C stored in SVN is breaking our distribution because life is awful (was Re: F28 System Wide Change: GCC8)
- Re: Dynamically-generated C stored in SVN is breaking our distribution because life is awful (was Re: F28 System Wide Change: GCC8)
- Re: to batch or not to batch?
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: new pagure repo is not accepted due to different e-mail addresses.
- new pagure repo is not accepted due to different e-mail addresses.
- Re: <DKIM> Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Dynamically-generated C stored in SVN is breaking our distribution because life is awful (was Re: F28 System Wide Change: GCC8)
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Re: F28 System Wide Change: GCC8
- Fedora Rawhide-20180219.n.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180219.n.0 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- From: Francisco J. Tsao Santin
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity WG (once every two weeks)
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: BSD 2-Clause license
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- BSD 2-Clause license
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- libgnome-games-support soname bump in rawhide
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: to batch or not to batch?
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- f2c new version
- Re: to batch or not to batch?
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Orphaned Packages looking for a new point of contact
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: HEADS UP - Changes to Ghostscript package in F28
- From: David Kaspar [Dee'Kej]
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Re: Intent to retire: zerofree
- Re: Removal of sln
- Re: to batch or not to batch?
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- From: Jens-Ulrik Petersen
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: Intent to retire: zerofree
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: Removal of sln
- Re: Removal of sln
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: Intent to retire: zerofree
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: Pagure - Can't remove yourself from a project if not an admin?
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: Scilab, rkward install in Rawhide: nothing provides libgfortran.so.4()
- Re: Unannounced soname bump: gnome-desktop3
- Re: Unannounced soname bump: gnome-desktop3
- Fedora Rawhide-20180218.n.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: can't push to perl-HTML-Strip master
- Re: can't push to perl-HTML-Strip master
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- [Test-Announce] 2018-02-19 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- can't push to perl-HTML-Strip master
- Re: dnf: Can't tell me what is pulling in a dependency?
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180218.n.0 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: to batch or not to batch?
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- From: Robert-André Mauchin
- drpm
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Intent to retire: zerofree
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: Intent to retire: zerofree
- Re: Intent to retire: zerofree
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: dnf: Can't tell me what is pulling in a dependency?
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Unannounced soname bump: gnome-desktop3
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Intent to retire: zerofree
- [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: dnf: Can't tell me what is pulling in a dependency?
- Re: Removal of sln
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: Changing config from a %post?
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: GCC 8: camotics fails to build for i686, ARMv7 arches (reading 31 bytes from a region of size 16)
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: fedup upload failure
- Re: Removal of sln
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: fedup upload failure
- Re: fedup upload failure
- fedup upload failure
- Re: dnf: Can't tell me what is pulling in a dependency?
- dnf: Can't tell me what is pulling in a dependency?
- Re: to batch or not to batch?
- Re: to batch or not to batch?
- Re: Removal of sln
- Re: Koji build: cannot find spec file
- From: Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk
- Re: to batch or not to batch?
- Re: to batch or not to batch?
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- unannounced soname bump: gnome-desktop3 / libgnome-desktop-3
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180217.n.2 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Koji build: cannot find spec file
- Re: Koji build: cannot find spec file
- Re: Koji build: cannot find spec file
- Fedora Rawhide-20180217.n.2 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Koji build: cannot find spec file
- Koji build: cannot find spec file
- Re: to batch or not to batch?
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: F29 Self Contained Change: FedoraScientific VagrantBox
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- to batch or not to batch?
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: [HEADS UP] Replacing %post/%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: F29 Self Contained Change: FedoraScientific VagrantBox
- Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot
- Re: Removal of sln
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Elasticsearch dependency tree trim?
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: RFC: BugURL in packages
- Re: RFC: BugURL in packages
- Pagure - Can't remove yourself from a project if not an admin?
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: <DKIM> Re: [HEADS UP] Replacing %post/%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
- Re: [HEADS UP] Replacing %post/%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
- Re: [HEADS UP] Replacing %post/%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
- Re: Scilab, rkward install in Rawhide: nothing provides libgfortran.so.4()
- Scilab, rkward install in Rawhide: nothing provides libgfortran.so.4()
- Re: [HEADS UP] Replacing %post/%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
- F29 Self Contained Change: FedoraScientific VagrantBox
- Re: [HEADS UP] Replacing %post/%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
- Re: [HEADS UP] Replacing %post/%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: Removal of BuildRoot
- Re: [HEADS UP] Replacing %post/%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
- Re: RFC: BugURL in packages
- Re: RFC: BugURL in packages
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: RFC: BugURL in packages
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Removal of sln
- Re: Orphaned Packages looking for a new point of contact
- Re: RFC: BugURL in packages
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Orphaned Packages looking for a new point of contact
- Re: [HEADS UP] Replacing %post/%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Announce]
[Fedora Testing]
[Fedora Legacy Announce]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Security]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]