Re: F28 Self Contained Change: Stop building 389-ds-base on i686

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/29/2018 10:25 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
We can not back out the atomic work
because it's needed to address several issues in our server.

One thing that's still not clear to me: What happens on 32-bit architectures which do not have 64-bit atomics? Are they buggy in a different way, and you used 64-bit atomics to address this because i686 is still the most important 32-bit architecture?

Looking at slapi_atomic_load_64 and slapi_atomic_incr_64, on the pure 32-bit architectures, you just use 32-bit counters instead of 64-bit counters. So whatever problems you were trying to fix exist on armhfp as well, and if the 32-bit atomics aren't good enough, you have to exclude armhfp as well.

Do you have a reproducer for the issues you are trying to fix? I can try to put something together which uses a different type for 64-bit atomics which has the proper 8-byte alignment, which will eliminate the known cause of incorrect CAS results on i686.

Thanks,
Florian
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux