Upcoming gdouros-*-fonts license change and subsequent complications

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello all,

I doubt most of you know or care about George Douros' family of fonts,
as almost all of them are quite niche. However, there is one font in
particular, Symbola, that a number of users and packagers care for,
since it follows closely all the Unicode additions and improvements.

A few of weeks ago, the creator of the fonts took down his web page
and along with a message about the site being under reconstruction,
there is now this:
"Software on this site is free strictly for personal, non-commercial use."

In the past, in lieu of a license, he had this piece of text:
"Fonts and documents in this site are not pieces of property or
merchandise items; they carry no trademark, copyright, license or
other market tags; they are free for any use."

The previous wording essentially put the fonts in the Public Domain -
perfectly acceptable for inclusion in Fedora.

That change raised some red flags, so I contacted him about it and we
exchanged a couple of messages. Nothing is set in stone yet, but some
time soon he is going to upload a whole new license text (hopefully in
English), probably something custom-made. Along with the fonts, there
will probably be some sort of software, hence its mention. Apparently
he is not hostile to linux distros redistributing his fonts, but he
took issue when I pointed him to our licensing pages and he did call
redistributors and font web sites "license pushers" (at times he is a
bit temperamental like that). I asked him if the new license will
cover redistribution in a distro context specifically, but he has not
replied yet (I suspect he is away on Easter holidays).

With all that in mind and while I wait for the license text, I have a
few questions:

- Am I right to assume that "free strictly for personal,
non-commercial use" is incompatible with our guidelines?

- If it is indeed incompatible, would trying to convince him to adopt
a dual license scheme be the best course of action?

- If the new license prohibits us from distributing the fonts, do we
need to drop the packages from Fedora or can we continue to use their
current versions?

- Finally, if everything fails, is there a suitable and equivalent
replacement for Symbola?


Best regards
Alex
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux