On 03/23/2018 07:36 PM, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > On 24 March 2018 at 00:24, Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > [..] >> >> Update - the person who did the bump did rebuild several dependencies, >> but importantly not texlive-base or gdal. We are running those now. > > BTW In situations like this is possible to observe how really bad idea > was building ALL Fedora +5.6k texlive* packages from single sec file. Except that is no longer the case. texlive-base only has ~120 or so subpackages for each arch and also most of the packages that are deps for other things. The larger 'texlive' package is now a noarch package that doesn't need to be rebuilt very often. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx