On Fri, 2018-04-06 at 11:09 +0100, James Hogarth wrote: > There's a good reason we have the change deadlines we do - and > honestly I think dropping a subpackage (as opposed to retiring which > is more visible) is sufficiently disruptive (and annoyingly invisible > otherwise) that it should go through the Change process. It wouldn't be remotely viable to have a Change for every dropped subpackage. It'd completely overwhelm the process. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
