OT: Re: Intent to orphan Python 2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 08:56:02PM +0100, Matěj Cepl wrote:

> On Sat, 24 Mar 2018 23:12:31 +0000
> "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Just curious: better programming environments … such us?  
 
> Anything in the ML family of course.

So, in looking it up, those languages have been around for almost 50
years, and they haven't "caught on".  Why?  Programmers are usually
quick to pick up something which is better.  What is it about ML family
languages that have caused them to be passed over?

I tried programming in lisp a long time ago, and found it was not a
good fit for the way I think about programming solutions because of its
functional nature. Is that the reason for most people?  To put it
another way, if people don't cut their teeth on declarative languages,
if their first exposure to programming is via a functional language, do
they then embrace functional programming?  Or is it like right and left
handedness, inherent in people, with the majority preferring
declarative?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux