Linux RAID Storage Date Index
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df2f2/df2f2a5779fb6d5d09f9f822adb08625e2a87275" alt=""
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: best way to replace all disks
- From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 mdadm --grow wrote nothing (Reshape Status : 0% complete) and cannot assemble anymore
- From: Julien ROBIN <julien.robin28@xxxxxxx>
- Re: WARNING: CPU: 13 PID: 3786 at drivers/md/raid5.c:4611 break_stripe_batch_list+0x86/0x1fb
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- WARNING: CPU: 13 PID: 3786 at drivers/md/raid5.c:4611 break_stripe_batch_list+0x86/0x1fb
- From: Marc Smith <msmith626@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH V2 0/1] Introduce emergency raid0 stop for mounted arrays
- From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 mdadm --grow wrote nothing (Reshape Status : 0% complete) and cannot assemble anymore
- From: Julien ROBIN <julien.robin28@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH V2 0/1] Introduce emergency raid0 stop for mounted arrays
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 mdadm --grow wrote nothing (Reshape Status : 0% complete) and cannot assemble anymore
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 mdadm --grow wrote nothing (Reshape Status : 0% complete) and cannot assemble anymore
- From: Julien ROBIN <julien.robin28@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 mdadm --grow wrote nothing (Reshape Status : 0% complete) and cannot assemble anymore
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: Fix a NULL pointer dereference in generic_make_request()
- From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH V2 0/1] Introduce emergency raid0 stop for mounted arrays
- From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] md/raid0: Do not bypass blocking queue entered for raid0 bios
- From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] block: Fix a NULL pointer dereference in generic_make_request()
- From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 mdadm --grow wrote nothing (Reshape Status : 0% complete) and cannot assemble anymore
- From: Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 mdadm --grow wrote nothing (Reshape Status : 0% complete) and cannot assemble anymore
- From: Julien ROBIN <julien.robin28@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 mdadm --grow wrote nothing (Reshape Status : 0% complete) and cannot assemble anymore
- From: Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 mdadm --grow wrote nothing (Reshape Status : 0% complete) and cannot assemble anymore
- From: Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 mdadm --grow wrote nothing (Reshape Status : 0% complete) and cannot assemble anymore
- From: Julien ROBIN <julien.robin28@xxxxxxx>
- RAID5 mdadm --grow wrote nothing (Reshape Status : 0% complete) and cannot assemble anymore
- From: Julien ROBIN <julien.robin28@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md: properly lock and unlock in rdev_attr_store()
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md: properly lock and unlock in rdev_attr_store()
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] md: properly lock and unlock in rdev_attr_store()
- From: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lost software raid information
- From: "Wol's lists" <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: best way to replace all disks
- From: "Wol's lists" <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Unexpected difference between a 4-disk RAID5 and a 3-disk RAID5 reshaped into a 4-disk RAID5
- From: Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Unexpected difference between a 4-disk RAID5 and a 3-disk RAID5 reshaped into a 4-disk RAID5
- From: pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
- Unexpected difference between a 4-disk RAID5 and a 3-disk RAID5 reshaped into a 4-disk RAID5
- From: David Shaw <dshaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lost software raid information
- From: Volker Lieder <v.lieder@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lost software raid information
- From: Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lost software raid information
- From: Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lost software raid information
- From: Volker Lieder <v.lieder@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lost software raid information
- From: Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- lost software raid information
- From: Volker Lieder <v.lieder@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Assemble: print error message if mdadm fails assembling with --uuid option
- From: Jinpu Wang <jinpu.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: best way to replace all disks
- From: Gandalf Corvotempesta <gandalf.corvotempesta@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: best way to replace all disks
- From: pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
- Re: best way to replace all disks
- From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] md-next 2019-04-19
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: best way to replace all disks
- From: Gandalf Corvotempesta <gandalf.corvotempesta@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: best way to replace all disks
- From: Gandalf Corvotempesta <gandalf.corvotempesta@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: best way to replace all disks
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: best way to replace all disks
- From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: best way to replace all disks
- From: Feng Zhang <prod.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: best way to replace all disks
- From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: best way to replace all disks
- From: Gandalf Corvotempesta <gandalf.corvotempesta@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: best way to replace all disks
- From: Gandalf Corvotempesta <gandalf.corvotempesta@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: best way to replace all disks
- From: Carsten Aulbert <carsten.aulbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: best way to replace all disks
- From: Gandalf Corvotempesta <gandalf.corvotempesta@xxxxxxxxx>
- best way to replace all disks
- From: Gandalf Corvotempesta <gandalf.corvotempesta@xxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL] md-next 2019-04-19
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH V2 0/1] Introduce emergency raid0 stop for mounted arrays
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC] [PATCH V2 1/1] md/raid0: Introduce emergency stop for raid0 arrays
- From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC] [PATCH V2 0/1] Introduce emergency raid0 stop for mounted arrays
- From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Nigel Croxon <ncroxon@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Nigel Croxon <ncroxon@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Nigel Croxon <ncroxon@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Assemble: print error message if mdadm fails assembling with --uuid option
- From: Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Nigel Croxon <ncroxon@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Nigel Croxon <ncroxon@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] udev: Add udev rules to create by-partuuid for md device
- From: Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@xxxxxxxxx>
- "echo frozen > /sys/block/md0/md/sync_action" locks up an array entirely
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Replacing a member disk in RAID0
- From: Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Replacing a member disk in RAID0
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Replacing a member disk in RAID0
- From: Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Replacing a member disk in RAID0
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Replacing a member disk in RAID0
- From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxx>
- Replacing a member disk in RAID0
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] udev: Add udev rules to create by-partuuid for md device
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] udev: Add udev rules to create by-partuuid for md device
- From: Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: reduce number of devices in raid6
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] md: return -ENODEV if rdev has no mddev assigned
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] md: return -ENODEV if rdev has no mddev assigned
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: reduce number of devices in raid6
- From: Eyal Lebedinsky <eyal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: reduce number of devices in raid6
- From: "Wol's lists" <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] md: return -ENODEV if rdev has no mddev assigned
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] md: return -ENODEV if rdev has no mddev assigned
- From: Pawel Baldysiak <pawel.baldysiak@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: reduce number of devices in raid6
- From: Eyal Lebedinsky <eyal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: reduce number of devices in raid6
- From: Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Degraded RAID-6 array reassembling as a RAID-0 array
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Degraded RAID-6 array reassembling as a RAID-0 array
- From: Mark Wagner <carnildo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md/raid0: don't use line[200] to store zone info
- From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Degraded RAID-6 array reassembling as a RAID-0 array
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [HELP] md/raid5: do we really avoid reading from known bad blocks ?
- From: "jianchao.wang" <jianchao.w.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] md fixes/changes for 5.2
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL] md fixes/changes for 5.2
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] md: return -ENODEV if rdev has no mddev assigned
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [HELP] md/raid5: do we really avoid reading from known bad blocks ?
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md/raid0: don't use line[200] to store zone info
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Degraded RAID-6 array reassembling as a RAID-0 array
- From: Mark Wagner <carnildo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Nigel Croxon <ncroxon@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Create: Block rounding size to max
- From: Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] imsm: fix spare activation for old matrix arrays
- From: Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] md: return -ENODEV if rdev has no mddev assigned
- From: Pawel Baldysiak <pawel.baldysiak@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] imsm: fix spare activation for old matrix arrays
- From: Pawel Baldysiak <pawel.baldysiak@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] md/raid0: don't use line[200] to store zone info
- From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
- reduce number of devices in raid6
- From: Eyal Lebedinsky <eyal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re[20]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [HELP] md/raid5: do we really avoid reading from known bad blocks ?
- From: "jianchao.wang" <jianchao.w.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: John Stoffel <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Nigel Croxon <ncroxon@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: "John Stoffel" <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [HELP] md/raid5: do we really avoid reading from known bad blocks ?
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- [HELP] md/raid5: do we really avoid reading from known bad blocks ?
- From: "jianchao.wang" <jianchao.w.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: One more newbee question:
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- One more newbee question:
- From: "Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI" <renaud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: OT: Processor recommendation
- From: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: OT: Processor recommendation
- From: Leslie Rhorer <lrhorer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- OT: Processor recommendation
- From: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/7] md: add a missing endianess conversion in check_sb_changes
- From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5/7] md: mark md_cluster_mod static
- From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: a bunch of MD raid fixes
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- seagate ST12000NM0007 disk issue
- From: Eyal Lebedinsky <eyal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re[18]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re[18]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re[18]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: no_spam@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re[16]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 7/7] md: add __acquires/__releases annotations to handle_active_stripes
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 6/7] md: add __acquires/__releases annotations to (un)lock_two_stripes
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/7] md: mark md_cluster_mod static
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/7] md: use correct type in super_1_sync
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/7] md: use correct type in super_1_load
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/7] md: use correct types in md_bitmap_print_sb
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/7] md: add a missing endianess conversion in check_sb_changes
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- a bunch of MD raid fixes
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Nigel Croxon <ncroxon@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Nigel Croxon <ncroxon@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re[16]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: no_spam@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] md: add mddev->pers to avoid potential NULL pointer dereference
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] md: add mddev->pers to avoid potential NULL pointer dereference
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] md: add mddev->pers to avoid potential NULL pointer dereference
- From: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md: add mddev->pers to avoid potential NULL pointer dereference
- From: yuyufen <yuyufen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md: add mddev->pers to avoid potential NULL pointer dereference
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] md: add mddev->pers to avoid potential NULL pointer dereference
- From: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Create: Block rounding size to max
- From: Mariusz Tkaczyk <mariusz.tkaczyk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help needed: RAID5 with two apparent simo drive failures
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help needed: RAID5 with two apparent simo drive failures
- From: "Jorge R. Frank" <jrfrank@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help needed: RAID5 with two apparent simo drive failures
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Help needed: RAID5 with two apparent simo drive failures
- From: "Jorge R. Frank" <jrfrank@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Question about Intel RST, NVMe SSDs and mdadm
- From: Raphaël Halimi <raphael.halimi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] md fixes and improvements
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] Revert "MD: fix lock contention for flush bios"
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] md: batch flush requests.
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3] md fixes and improvements
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- Re: Question about Intel RST, NVMe SSDs and mdadm
- From: Artur Paszkiewicz <artur.paszkiewicz@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] md: change approach to parallel flush requests.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
- Question about Intel RST, NVMe SSDs and mdadm
- From: Raphaël Halimi <raphael.halimi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] md: change approach to parallel flush requests.
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] md: change approach to parallel flush requests.
- From: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] md: change approach to parallel flush requests.
- From: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] md: change approach to parallel flush requests.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/1] md: return -ENODEV if rdev has no mddev assigned
- From: Pawel Baldysiak <pawel.baldysiak@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] md: change approach to parallel flush requests.
- From: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] Revert "MD: fix lock contention for flush bios"
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/2] md: change approach to parallel flush requests.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] md: batch flush requests.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re[14]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Nigel Croxon <ncroxon@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] udev: Add udev rules to create by-partuuid for md device
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
- Re[14]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: no_spam@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH] udev: Add udev rules to create by-partuuid for md device
- From: Liwei Song <liwei.song@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] udev: Add udev rules to create by-partuuid for md device
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC] md/raid1: fix deadlock between freeze_array() and wait_barrier().
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md:MD_CLOSING needs to be cleared after called md_set_readonly or do_md_stop
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] udev: Add udev rules to create by-partuuid for md device
- From: Liwei Song <liwei.song@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md:MD_CLOSING needs to be cleared after called md_set_readonly or do_md_stop
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md:MD_CLOSING needs to be cleared after called md_set_readonly or do_md_stop
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 4tb NAS drive recommendation
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] md changes for 5.1
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: troubleshooting RAID-1 array break+resync on boot after upgrades to linux kernel v5.0.x ?
- From: PGNet Dev <pgnet.dev@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: troubleshooting RAID-1 array break+resync on boot after upgrades to linux kernel v5.0.x ?
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- troubleshooting RAID-1 array break+resync on boot after upgrades to linux kernel v5.0.x ?
- From: PGNet Dev <pgnet.dev@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 4tb NAS drive recommendation
- From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 4tb NAS drive recommendation
- From: "John Stoffel" <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL] md changes for 5.1
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md: Fix failed allocation of md_register_thread
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] It's wrong to add len to sector_nr in raid10 reshape twice
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] raid5: set write hint for PPL
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Brad Campbell <lists2009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] raid5: set write hint for PPL
- From: "Dabrowski, Mariusz" <mariusz.dabrowski@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 4tb NAS drive recommendation
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 4tb NAS drive recommendation
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 4tb NAS drive recommendation
- From: "John Stoffel" <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Kai Stian Olstad <raid+list@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Nix <nix@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Nix <nix@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Brad Campbell <lists2009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re[13]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: "Wol's lists" <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Andy Smith <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re[13]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: no_spam@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Leslie Rhorer <lrhorer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re[11]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Leslie Rhorer <lrhorer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Kent Dorfman <kent.dorfman766@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Leslie Rhorer <lrhorer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Leslie Rhorer <lrhorer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid 5 painfully slow with linux 5.0.0
- From: Michael Leun <linux-raid-20190308@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Kent Dorfman <kent.dorfman766@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Kent Dorfman <kent.dorfman766@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re[11]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: no_spam@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Re[9]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re[9]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re[8]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re[8]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Raid 5 painfully slow with linux 5.0.0
- From: linux-raid-20190308@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 1/1] It's wrong to add len to sector_nr in raid10 reshape twice
- From: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/1] imsm: fix spare activation for old matrix arrays
- From: Pawel Baldysiak <pawel.baldysiak@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] raid5: set write hint for PPL
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re[9]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: no_spam@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re[8]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: no_spam@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Re[6]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re[6]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: no_spam@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH] md: Fix failed allocation of md_register_thread
- From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] raid5: set write hint for PPL
- From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re[4]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re[4]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] raid5: set write hint for PPL
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- Re[2]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: no_spam@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH v2] raid5: set write hint for PPL
- From: "Dabrowski, Mariusz" <mariusz.dabrowski@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re[2]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: zittware@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH] md: Fix failed allocation of md_register_thread
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] md: Fix failed allocation of md_register_thread
- From: Aditya Pakki <pakki001@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] add missing units to --examine
- From: Corey Hickey <bugfood-ml@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid5 four drives missing
- From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] add missing units to --examine
- From: Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] Assemble: Fix starting array with initial reshape checkpoint
- From: Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V2] mdmon: wait for previous mdmon to exit during takeover
- From: Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] mdmon: don't attempt to manage new arrays when terminating
- From: Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm RAID10 configuration - performance
- Re: [PATCH V15 14/18] block: enable multipage bvecs
- From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V15 14/18] block: enable multipage bvecs
- From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V15 14/18] block: enable multipage bvecs
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V15 14/18] block: enable multipage bvecs
- From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid5 reshape stuck - md0 process hang
- From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid5 reshape stuck - md0 process hang
- From: Brian <search@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid5 reshape stuck - md0 process hang
- From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid5 reshape stuck - md0 process hang
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 reshape is stuck when raid5 journal device miss
- From: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 reshape is stuck when raid5 journal device miss
- From: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
- mdadm RAID10 configuration - performance
- From: Guillermo F <guillefraz@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid5 reshape stuck - md0 process hang
- From: "search@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <search@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Raid5 reshape stuck - md0 process hang
- From: "search@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <search@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Raid5 stuck at reshape - md0 process hangs
- From: "search@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <search@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: AW: [PATCH] lib/raid6: possibly use different gen and xor algorithms.,
- From: Hristo Venev <hristo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- AW: [PATCH] lib/raid6: possibly use different gen and xor algorithms.,
- From: Markus Stockhausen <stockhausen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] lib/raid6: possibly use different gen and xor algorithms.,
- From: Hristo Venev <hristo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid5 four drives missing
- From: Romulo Albuquerque <romulo.albuquerque@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V2] mdmon: wait for previous mdmon to exit during takeover
- From: Pawel Baldysiak <pawel.baldysiak@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/1] Assemble: Fix starting array with initial reshape checkpoint
- From: Pawel Baldysiak <pawel.baldysiak@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] mdmon: don't attempt to manage new arrays when terminating
- From: Artur Paszkiewicz <artur.paszkiewicz@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V15 14/18] block: enable multipage bvecs
- From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V15 14/18] block: enable multipage bvecs
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V15 14/18] block: enable multipage bvecs
- From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V15 14/18] block: enable multipage bvecs
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V15 14/18] block: enable multipage bvecs
- From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V15 14/18] block: enable multipage bvecs
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V15 14/18] block: enable multipage bvecs
- From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: RAID6 : Sequential Write Performance
- From: Jean De Gyns <Jean.DeGyns@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH V15 00/18] block: support multi-page bvec
- From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH V15 00/18] block: support multi-page bvec
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 : Sequential Write Performance
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 : Sequential Write Performance
- From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 : Sequential Write Performance
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 : Sequential Write Performance
- From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 out of sync, but which files are affected?
- From: "David C. Rankin" <drankinatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid5 four drives missing
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 : Sequential Write Performance
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: RAID6 : Sequential Write Performance
- From: Jean De Gyns <Jean.DeGyns@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] mdmon: wait for previous mdmon to exit during takeover
- From: Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: RAID6 : Sequential Write Performance
- From: Jean De Gyns <Jean.DeGyns@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH V15 00/18] block: support multi-page bvec
- From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid5 four drives missing
- From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] mdmon: wait for previous mdmon to exit during takeover
- From: Pawel Baldysiak <pawel.baldysiak@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid5 four drives missing
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Raid5 four drives missing
- From: Romulo Albuquerque <romulo.albuquerque@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] raid5: set write hint for PPL
- From: Mariusz Dabrowski <mariusz.dabrowski@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH V15 00/18] block: support multi-page bvec
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH V15 00/18] block: support multi-page bvec
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH V15 00/18] block: support multi-page bvec
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V15 00/18] block: support multi-page bvec
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 : Sequential Write Performance
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] add missing units to --examine
- From: Corey Hickey <bugfood-ml@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 : Sequential Write Performance
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH V15 00/18] block: support multi-page bvec
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH V15 00/18] block: support multi-page bvec
- From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V15 00/18] block: support multi-page bvec
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 : Sequential Write Performance
- From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V15 00/18] block: support multi-page bvec
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH V15 18/18] block: kill BLK_MQ_F_SG_MERGE
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V15 17/18] block: kill QUEUE_FLAG_NO_SG_MERGE
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V15 16/18] block: document usage of bio iterator helpers
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V15 15/18] block: always define BIO_MAX_PAGES as 256
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V15 14/18] block: enable multipage bvecs
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V15 13/18] block: allow bio_for_each_segment_all() to iterate over multi-page bvec
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V15 12/18] bcache: avoid to use bio_for_each_segment_all() in bch_bio_alloc_pages()
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V15 11/18] block: loop: pass multi-page bvec to iov_iter
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V15 10/18] btrfs: use mp_bvec_last_segment to get bio's last page
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V15 09/18] fs/buffer.c: use bvec iterator to truncate the bio
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V15 08/18] block: introduce mp_bvec_last_segment()
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V15 07/18] block: use bio_for_each_bvec() to map sg
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V15 06/18] block: use bio_for_each_bvec() to compute multi-page bvec count
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V15 05/18] block: introduce bio_for_each_bvec() and rq_for_each_bvec()
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V15 04/18] block: introduce multi-page bvec helpers
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V15 03/18] block: remove bvec_iter_rewind()
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V15 02/18] block: don't use bio->bi_vcnt to figure out segment number
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V15 01/18] btrfs: look at bi_size for repair decisions
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V15 00/18] block: support multi-page bvec
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux 4.19.19: md0_raid:1317 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
- From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] mdadm/tests: add one test case for failfast of raid1
- From: Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] (again) THP for file systems
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux 4.19.19: md0_raid:1317 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
- From: Wolfgang Walter <linux@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 : Sequential Write Performance
- From: Wilson Jonathan <i400sjon@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] (again) THP for file systems
- From: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] raid5: set write hint for PPL
- From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux 4.19.19: md0_raid:1317 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
- From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] (again) THP for file systems
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] (again) THP for file systems
- From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [LSF/MM TOPIC] (again) THP for file systems
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 out of sync, but which files are affected?
- From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix reshape for decreasing data offset
- From: Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] add missing units to --examine
- From: Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Detail.c: do not skip first character when calling xstrdup in Detail()
- From: Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 out of sync, but which files are affected?
- From: Robert L Mathews <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RAID6 : Sequential Write Performance
- From: Jean De Gyns <Jean.DeGyns@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] mdmon: wait for previous mdmon to exit during takeover
- From: Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/1] mdmon: wait for previous mdmon to exit during takeover
- From: Pawel Baldysiak <pawel.baldysiak@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] raid5: set write hint for PPL
- From: Mariusz Dabrowski <mariusz.dabrowski@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 out of sync, but which files are affected?
- From: "Nik.Brt." <nik.brt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 out of sync, but which files are affected?
- From: Nix <nix@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] md fix
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] md fix
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 out of sync, but which files are affected?
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] md fix
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 out of sync, but which files are affected?
- From: Nix <nix@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL] md fix
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V2] md/raid1: don't clear bitmap bits on interrupted recovery.
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V2] md/raid1: don't clear bitmap bits on interrupted recovery.
- From: Jinpu Wang <jinpu.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux 4.19.19: md0_raid:1317 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
- From: Wolfgang Walter <linux@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V2] md/raid1: don't clear bitmap bits on interrupted recovery.
- From: Jinpu Wang <jinpu.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Detail.c: do not skip first character when calling xstrdup in Detail()
- From: Coly Li <colyli@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Make --examine print sizes more consistently
- From: Corey Hickey <bugfood-ml@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] add missing units to --examine
- From: bugfood-ml@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH] Fix reshape for decreasing data offset
- From: Corey Hickey <bugfood-ml@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Fix reshape for decreasing data offset
- From: bugfood-ml@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH V2] md/raid1: don't clear bitmap bits on interrupted recovery.
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix spelling typpos.
- From: Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] imsm: fix reshape for >2TB drives
- From: Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] imsm: finish recovery when drive with rebuild fails
- From: Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Make --examine print sizes more consistently
- From: Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix reshape for decreasing data offset
- From: Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V2] md/raid1: don't clear bitmap bits on interrupted recovery.
- From: Nate Dailey <nate.dailey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Make --examine print sizes more consistently
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid456's devices_handle_discard_safely is unusably slow
- From: Michal Soltys <soltys@xxxxxxxx>
- linux 4.19.19: md0_raid:1317 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
- From: Wolfgang Walter <linux@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V2] md/raid1: don't clear bitmap bits on interrupted recovery.
- From: Jinpu Wang <jinpu.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 out of sync, but which files are affected?
- From: Harald Dunkel <harri@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Make --examine print sizes more consistently
- From: Corey Hickey <bugfood-ml@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix reshape for decreasing data offset
- From: Corey Hickey <bugfood-ml@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V2] md/raid1: don't clear bitmap bits on interrupted recovery.
- From: Nate Dailey <nate.dailey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md/raid1: don't clear bitmap bits on interrupted recovery.
- From: Nate Dailey <nate.dailey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md/raid1: don't clear bitmap bits on interrupted recovery.
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid456's devices_handle_discard_safely is unusably slow
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] imsm: finish recovery when drive with rebuild fails
- From: Mariusz Tkaczyk <mariusz.tkaczyk@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] md/raid1: don't clear bitmap bits on interrupted recovery.
- From: Nate Dailey <nate.dailey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid456's devices_handle_discard_safely is unusably slow
- From: Michal Soltys <soltys@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] md pull for 5.1
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] md pull for 5.1
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] md pull for 5.1
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] md pull for 5.1
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL] md pull for 5.1
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4.14 43/46] md/raid5: fix out of memory during raid cache recovery
- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4.20 79/80] md/raid5: fix out of memory during raid cache recovery
- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4.19 73/74] md/raid5: fix out of memory during raid cache recovery
- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] raid1: simplify raid1_error function
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] raid1: simplify raid1_error function
- From: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LSI RAID assembly
- From: Leslie Rhorer <lrhorer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LSI RAID assembly
- From: Leslie Rhorer <lrhorer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm's raid1 will not eliminate abnormal disk after 5 seconds under IO pressure
- From: 李春 <pickup112@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm's raid1 will not eliminate abnormal disk after 5 seconds under IO pressure
- From: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LSI RAID assembly
- From: Leslie Rhorer <lrhorer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LSI RAID assembly
- From: Leslie Rhorer <lrhorer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LSI RAID assembly
- Re: raid456's devices_handle_discard_safely is unusably slow
- From: Michal Soltys <soltys@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm's raid1 will not eliminate abnormal disk after 5 seconds under IO pressure
- From: 李春 <pickup112@xxxxxxxxx>
- LSI RAID assembly
- From: Leslie Rhorer <lrhorer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm's raid1 will not eliminate abnormal disk after 5 seconds under IO pressure
- From: 李春 <pickup112@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm's raid1 will not eliminate abnormal disk after 5 seconds under IO pressure
- From: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Disabling HDD write cache neccessary (hdparm -W0)?
- From: "Nik.Brt." <nik.brt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm's raid1 will not eliminate abnormal disk after 5 seconds under IO pressure
- From: Jack Wang <xjtuwjp@xxxxxxxxx>
- mdadm's raid1 will not eliminate abnormal disk after 5 seconds under IO pressure
- From: 李春 <pickup112@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md-linear: use struct_size() in kzalloc()
- From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md-linear: use struct_size() in kzalloc()
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Disabling HDD write cache neccessary (hdparm -W0)?
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md-linear: use struct_size() in kzalloc()
- From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Disabling HDD write cache neccessary (hdparm -W0)?
- From: Michal Soltys <soltys@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: A (raid)-newbee question:
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] md fixes for raid5-cache
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Disabling HDD write cache neccessary (hdparm -W0)?
- From: Werner Fischer <devlists@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Disabling HDD write cache neccessary (hdparm -W0)?
- From: piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx
- Disabling HDD write cache neccessary (hdparm -W0)?
- From: Werner Fischer <devlists@xxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL] md fixes for raid5-cache
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- Re: raid456's devices_handle_discard_safely is unusably slow
- From: Michal Soltys <soltys@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 205/258] md: fix raid10 hang issue caused by barrier
- From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid456's devices_handle_discard_safely is unusably slow
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 128/170] md: fix raid10 hang issue caused by barrier
- From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/1] imsm: fix reshape for >2TB drives
- From: Pawel Baldysiak <pawel.baldysiak@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.20 245/304] md: fix raid10 hang issue caused by barrier
- From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid456's devices_handle_discard_safely is unusably slow
- From: Michal Soltys <soltys@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid456's devices_handle_discard_safely is unusably slow
- From: Michal Soltys <soltys@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: A (raid)-newbee question:
- From: Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- A (raid)-newbee question:
- From: "Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI" <renaud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 out of sync, but which files are affected?
- From: "Nik.Brt." <nik.brt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 out of sync, but which files are affected?
- From: Eyal Lebedinsky <eyal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 out of sync, but which files are affected?
- From: "Nik.Brt." <nik.brt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 out of sync, but which files are affected?
- From: Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 out of sync, but which files are affected?
- From: Eyal Lebedinsky <eyal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid456's devices_handle_discard_safely is unusably slow
- From: Michal Soltys <soltys@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 out of sync, but which files are affected?
- From: Harald Dunkel <harri@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 out of sync, but which files are affected?
- From: Eyal Lebedinsky <eyal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- raid1 out of sync, but which files are affected?
- From: Harald Dunkel <harri@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid456's devices_handle_discard_safely is unusably slow
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bugfix / feature requests for raid5cache (writeback)
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- raid456's devices_handle_discard_safely is unusably slow
- From: Michal Soltys <soltys@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bugfix / feature requests for raid5cache (writeback)
- From: "Nik.Brt." <nik.brt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: question about cache flushes and raid journal in writeback mode
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bugfix / feature requests for raid5cache (writeback)
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Bugfix / feature requests for raid5cache (writeback)
- From: "Nik.Brt." <nik.brt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: question about cache flushes and raid journal in writeback mode
- From: Michal Soltys <soltys@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: question about cache flushes and raid journal in writeback mode
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- question about cache flushes and raid journal in writeback mode
- From: Michal Soltys <soltys@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Trouble Shrinking RAID6 from 5 to 4 drives
- From: Eric Pulvino <ericpulvino@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V14 00/18] block: support multi-page bvec
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Two drives in RAID6 array experienced similar error at or near beginning of drive
- From: Basil Mohamed Gohar <basilgohar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V14 00/18] block: support multi-page bvec
- From: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V14 00/18] block: support multi-page bvec
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V14 00/18] block: support multi-page bvec
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V14 00/18] block: support multi-page bvec
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V14 16/18] block: document usage of bio iterator helpers
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V14 00/18] block: support multi-page bvec
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH V14 18/18] block: kill BLK_MQ_F_SG_MERGE
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V14 17/18] block: kill QUEUE_FLAG_NO_SG_MERGE
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V14 15/18] block: always define BIO_MAX_PAGES as 256
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V14 13/18] block: allow bio_for_each_segment_all() to iterate over multi-page bvec
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V14 14/18] block: enable multipage bvecs
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V14 12/18] bcache: avoid to use bio_for_each_segment_all() in bch_bio_alloc_pages()
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V14 10/18] btrfs: use mp_bvec_last_segment to get bio's last page
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V14 11/18] block: loop: pass multi-page bvec to iov_iter
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V14 09/18] fs/buffer.c: use bvec iterator to truncate the bio
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V14 07/18] block: use bio_for_each_mp_bvec() to map sg
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V14 08/18] block: introduce mp_bvec_last_segment()
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V14 06/18] block: use bio_for_each_mp_bvec() to compute multi-page bvec count
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V14 05/18] block: introduce bio_for_each_mp_bvec() and rq_for_each_mp_bvec()
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V14 04/18] block: introduce multi-page bvec helpers
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V14 03/18] block: remove bvec_iter_rewind()
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V14 02/18] block: don't use bio->bi_vcnt to figure out segment number
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V14 01/18] btrfs: look at bi_size for repair decisions
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V14 00/18] block: support multi-page bvec
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 revert-reshape issue
- From: Romulo Albuquerque <romulo.albuquerque@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Trouble Shrinking RAID6 from 5 to 4 drives
- From: Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Two drives in RAID6 array experienced similar error at or near beginning of drive
- From: Siniša Bandin <sinisa@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 revert-reshape issue
- From: Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 revert-reshape issue
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Trouble Shrinking RAID6 from 5 to 4 drives
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 revert-reshape issue
- From: Romulo Albuquerque <romulo.albuquerque@xxxxxxxxx>
- Trouble Shrinking RAID6 from 5 to 4 drives
- From: Eric Pulvino <ericpulvino@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Two drives in RAID6 array experienced similar error at or near beginning of drive
- From: Basil Mohamed Gohar <basilgohar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Two drives in RAID6 array experienced similar error at or near beginning of drive
- From: Basil Mohamed Gohar <basilgohar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Two drives in RAID6 array experienced similar error at or near beginning of drive
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Two drives in RAID6 array experienced similar error at or near beginning of drive
- From: Basil Mohamed Gohar <basilgohar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Two drives in RAID6 array experienced similar error at or near beginning of drive
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Two drives in RAID6 array experienced similar error at or near beginning of drive
- From: Carsten Aulbert <carsten.aulbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Two drives in RAID6 array experienced similar error at or near beginning of drive
- From: Basil Mohamed Gohar <basilgohar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Two drives in RAID6 array experienced similar error at or near beginning of drive
- From: Carsten Aulbert <carsten.aulbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Two drives in RAID6 array experienced similar error at or near beginning of drive
- From: Basil Mohamed Gohar <basilgohar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Two drives in RAID6 array experienced similar error at or near beginning of drive
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Two drives in RAID6 array experienced similar error at or near beginning of drive
- From: Basil Mohamed Gohar <basilgohar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Possible Setup Error On New /dev/mdX Device
- From: Shaun Glass <shaunglass@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Possible Setup Error On New /dev/mdX Device
- From: Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 revert-reshape issue
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Possible Setup Error On New /dev/mdX Device
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Possible Setup Error On New /dev/mdX Device
- From: Shaun Glass <shaunglass@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 revert-reshape issue
- From: Romulo Albuquerque <romulo.albuquerque@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 revert-reshape issue
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- raid5 revert-reshape issue
- From: Romulo Albuquerque <romulo.albuquerque@xxxxxxxxx>
- Writes-starving-reads with raid10 on cfq, deadline, mq-deadline and possibly bfq
- From: Pol Van Aubel <linux-raid@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Fix spelling typpos.
- From: Dimitri John Ledkov <xnox@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V13 00/19] block: support multi-page bvec
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] drivers/md.c: Make bio_alloc_mddev return bio_alloc_bioset
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] drivers/md.c: Make bio_alloc_mddev return bio_alloc_bioset
- From: Artur Paszkiewicz <artur.paszkiewicz@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V13 15/19] block: enable multipage bvecs
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V13 16/19] block: always define BIO_MAX_PAGES as 256
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V13 19/19] block: kill BLK_MQ_F_SG_MERGE
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V13 18/19] block: kill QUEUE_FLAG_NO_SG_MERGE
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V13 17/19] block: document usage of bio iterator helpers
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V13 14/19] block: allow bio_for_each_segment_all() to iterate over multi-page bvec
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V13 13/19] bcache: avoid to use bio_for_each_segment_all() in bch_bio_alloc_pages()
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V13 12/19] block: loop: pass multi-page bvec to iov_iter
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V13 11/19] btrfs: use bvec_last_segment to get bio's last page
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V13 10/19] fs/buffer.c: use bvec iterator to truncate the bio
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V13 09/19] block: introduce bvec_last_segment()
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V13 08/19] block: use bio_for_each_bvec() to map sg
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V13 07/19] block: use bio_for_each_bvec() to compute multi-page bvec count
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V13 06/19] block: introduce bio_for_each_bvec() and rq_for_each_bvec()
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V13 05/19] block: introduce multi-page bvec helpers
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V13 04/19] block: rename bvec helpers
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V13 03/19] block: remove bvec_iter_rewind()
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V13 02/19] block: don't use bio->bi_vcnt to figure out segment number
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V13 01/19] btrfs: look at bi_size for repair decisions
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V13 00/19] block: support multi-page bvec
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] drivers/md.c: Make bio_alloc_mddev return bio_alloc_bioset
- From: Marcos Paulo de Souza <marcos.souza.org@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Fix reshape for decreasing data offset
- From: bugfood-ml@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH] md/raid10: Use struct_size() in kmalloc()
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md-linear: use struct_size() in kzalloc()
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Make --examine print sizes more consistently
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] md-linear: use struct_size() in kzalloc()
- From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Make --examine print sizes more consistently
- From: bugfood-ml@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH] md/raid10: Use struct_size() in kmalloc()
- From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Shaohua Li
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Shaohua Li
- From: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Shaohua Li
- From: Jinpu Wang <jinpuwang@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Shaohua Li
- From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Software RAID memory issue?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Software RAID memory issue?
- From: Richard Alloway <richard.alloway@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Shaohua Li
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] raid6_pq: Add module options to prefer algorithm
- From: Timofey Titovets <nefelim4ag@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5: BUG_ON(atomic_inc_return(&sh->count) != 1)
- From: Anssi Hannula <anssi.hannula@xxxxxx>
- Re: RAID1 scrub ignoring read errors?
- From: Niklas Hambüchen <mail@xxxxxx>
- Re: My array won't assemble
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] drivers/md.c: Make bio_alloc_mddev return bio_alloc_bioset
- From: Marcos Paulo de Souza <marcos.souza.org@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: My array won't assemble
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: My array won't assemble
- From: Alexis BRENON <brenon.alexis@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: My array won't assemble
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: My array won't assemble
- From: Alexis BRENON <brenon.alexis@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: My array won't assemble
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: My array won't assemble
- From: Alexis BRENON <brenon.alexis@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: My array won't assemble
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: My array won't assemble
- From: Alexis BRENON <brenon.alexis@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: My array won't assemble
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- BUG_ON() hit in drivers/md/raid5.c
- From: Kai Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: My array won't assemble
- From: Alexis BRENON <brenon.alexis@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] md: fix raid10 hang issue caused by barrier
- From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: My array won't assemble
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- My array won't assemble
- From: Alexis BRENON <brenon.alexis@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: XFS and RAID10 with o2 layout
- From: Sinisa <sinisa@xxxxxxx>
- Re: XFS and RAID10 with o2 layout
- From: Sinisa <sinisa@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/7] md: convert to kvmalloc
- From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix typo in RWH_WRITE_LIFE_NOT_SET constant name
- From: Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Replacing MOBO seems to have disappeared my software RAID1...?
- From: Signup <signup@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Replacing MOBO seems to have disappeared my software RAID1...?
- From: Signup <signup@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: XFS and RAID10 with o2 layout
- From: Siniša Bandin <sinisa@xxxxxxx>
- Re: XFS and RAID10 with o2 layout
- From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: XFS and RAID10 with o2 layout
- From: "John Stoffel" <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Replacing MOBO seems to have disappeared my software RAID1...?
- From: "John Stoffel" <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: XFS and RAID10 with o2 layout
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: XFS and RAID10 with o2 layout
- From: Sinisa <sinisa@xxxxxxx>
- Re: XFS and RAID10 with o2 layout
- From: Sinisa <sinisa@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Replacing MOBO seems to have disappeared my software RAID1...?
- From: Signup <signup@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Replacing MOBO seems to have disappeared my software RAID1...?
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Replacing MOBO seems to have disappeared my software RAID1...?
- From: Signup <signup@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Replacing MOBO seems to have disappeared my software RAID1...?
- From: Signup <signup@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Replacing MOBO seems to have disappeared my software RAID1...?
- From: Signup <signup@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: XFS and RAID10 with o2 layout
- Re: Aw: Re: assemble broken raid5
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: XFS and RAID10 with o2 layout
- From: Sinisa <sinisa@xxxxxxx>
- Re: controller failed - help recreating array
- From: Stephen Remde <stephen.remde@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Aw: Re: assemble broken raid5
- From: "Alex Sommer" <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: assemble broken raid5
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: controller failed - help recreating array
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- assemble broken raid5
- From: "Alex Sommer" <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- controller failed - help recreating array
- From: Stephen Remde <stephen.remde@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Replacing MOBO seems to have disappeared my software RAID1...?
- From: "John Stoffel" <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Replacing MOBO seems to have disappeared my software RAID1...?
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Replacing MOBO seems to have disappeared my software RAID1...?
- From: "John Stoffel" <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Replacing MOBO seems to have disappeared my software RAID1...?
- From: Signup <signup@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Replacing MOBO seems to have disappeared my software RAID1...?
- From: Signup <signup@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Replacing MOBO seems to have disappeared my software RAID1...?
- From: "John Stoffel" <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Replacing MOBO seems to have disappeared my software RAID1...?
- From: "John Stoffel" <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Replacing MOBO seems to have disappeared my software RAID1...?
- From: Signup <signup@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: XFS and RAID10 with o2 layout
- From: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] policy.c: Fix for compiler error
- From: "Tkaczyk, Mariusz" <mariusz.tkaczyk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Software RAID memory issue?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Replacing MOBO seems to have disappeared my software RAID1...?
- From: "John Stoffel" <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] policy.c: Fix for compiler error
- From: Jes Sorensen <jsorensen@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] policy.c: prevent NULL pointer referencing
- From: Jes Sorensen <jsorensen@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH] policy.c: Fix for compiler error
- From: Mariusz Tkaczyk <mariusz.tkaczyk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Kernel bug on shli_md-for-next
- From: "Tkaczyk, Mariusz" <mariusz.tkaczyk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Replacing MOBO seems to have disappeared my software RAID1...?
- From: Signup <signup@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Software RAID memory issue?
- From: Richard Alloway <richard.alloway@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Software RAID memory issue?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 becoming raid0 when device is removed before reboot
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 becoming raid0 when device is removed before reboot
- From: Niklas Hambüchen <mail@xxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 becoming raid0 when device is removed before reboot
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] policy.c: prevent NULL pointer referencing
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID1 scrub ignoring read errors?
- From: Niklas Hambüchen <mail@xxxxxx>
- Re: RAID1 scrub ignoring read errors?
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] mdadm/tests: add one test case for failfast of raid1
- From: Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] policy.c: prevent NULL pointer referencing
- From: Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 becoming raid0 when device is removed before reboot
- From: Niklas Hambüchen <mail@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH] raid10: refactor common wait code from regular read/write request
- From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 becoming raid0 when device is removed before reboot
- From: Niklas Hambüchen <mail@xxxxxx>
- Re: RAID1 scrub ignoring read errors?
- From: Niklas Hambüchen <mail@xxxxxx>
- Re: RAID1 scrub ignoring read errors?
- From: Niklas Hambüchen <mail@xxxxxx>
- Re: RAID1 scrub ignoring read errors?
- From: Niklas Hambüchen <mail@xxxxxx>
- Re: RAID1 scrub ignoring read errors?
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Software RAID memory issue?
- From: Richard Alloway <richard.alloway@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID1 scrub ignoring read errors?
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID1 scrub ignoring read errors?
- From: Brad Campbell <lists2009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCHv2] Assemble: keep MD_DISK_FAILFAST and MD_DISK_WRITEMOSTLY flag
- From: Jes Sorensen <jsorensen@xxxxxx>
- Re: RAID1 scrub ignoring read errors?
- From: Niklas Hambüchen <mail@xxxxxx>
- Re: Software RAID memory issue?
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCHv2] Assemble: keep MD_DISK_FAILFAST and MD_DISK_WRITEMOSTLY flag
- From: Gi-Oh Kim <gi-oh.kim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCHv2] Assemble: keep MD_DISK_FAILFAST and MD_DISK_WRITEMOSTLY flag
- From: Jes Sorensen <jsorensen@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCHv2] Assemble: keep MD_DISK_FAILFAST and MD_DISK_WRITEMOSTLY flag
- From: Gi-Oh Kim <gi-oh.kim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Grow: report correct new chunk size.
- From: Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCHv2] Assemble: keep MD_DISK_FAILFAST and MD_DISK_WRITEMOSTLY flag
- From: Gi-Oh Kim <gi-oh.kim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] Grow: avoid overflow in compute_backup_blocks()
- From: Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC] Assemble: mask FAILFAST and WRITEMOSTLY flags when finding the most recent device
- From: Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] imsm: update metadata correctly while raid10 double degradation
- From: Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] mdadm fixes for Policy in mdadm.conf
- From: Jes Sorensen <jsorensen@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] mdadm: add systemd units for periodic tasks.
- From: Jes Sorensen <jsorensen@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCHv2] Assemble: keep MD_DISK_FAILFAST and MD_DISK_WRITEMOSTLY flag
- From: Jes Sorensen <jsorensen@xxxxxx>
- Re: Issues with large chunk size (16Mb)
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] Grow: report correct new chunk size.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] Grow: avoid overflow in compute_backup_blocks()
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
- Software RAID memory issue?
- From: Richard Alloway <richard.alloway@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 becoming raid0 when device is removed before reboot
- From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 becoming raid0 when device is removed before reboot
- From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 becoming raid0 when device is removed before reboot
- From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] Monitor: add system timer to run --oneshot periodically
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] mdcheck: add systemd unit files to run mdcheck.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/2] mdadm: add systemd units for periodic tasks.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Revive a dead md raid5 array
- From: Jogchum Reitsma <jogchum.reitsma@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID1 scrub ignoring read errors?
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID1 scrub ignoring read errors?
- From: Brad Campbell <lists2009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID1 scrub ignoring read errors?
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID1 scrub ignoring read errors?
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID1 scrub ignoring read errors?
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID1 scrub ignoring read errors?
- From: Niklas Hambüchen <mail@xxxxxx>
- Re: RAID1 scrub ignoring read errors?
- From: Niklas Hambüchen <mail@xxxxxx>
- Re: RAID1 scrub ignoring read errors?
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID1 scrub ignoring read errors?
- From: Niklas Hambüchen <mail@xxxxxx>
- Re: RAID1 scrub ignoring read errors?
- From: Niklas Hambüchen <mail@xxxxxx>
- Re: RAID1 scrub ignoring read errors?
- From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID1 scrub ignoring read errors?
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID1 scrub ignoring read errors?
- From: "Wol's lists" <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID1 scrub ignoring read errors?
- From: Niklas Hambüchen <mail@xxxxxx>
- Re: RAID1 scrub ignoring read errors?
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID1 scrub ignoring read errors?
- From: Niklas Hambüchen <mail@xxxxxx>
- Re: RAID1 scrub ignoring read errors?
- From: Niklas Hambüchen <mail@xxxxxx>
- RAID1 scrub ignoring read errors?
- From: Niklas Hambüchen <mail@xxxxxx>
- Warnings related to mdadm_env.sh with systemd on non-SUSE distributions
- From: Louis Sautier <sautier.louis@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Issues with large chunk size (16Mb)
- From: Ed Spiridonov <edo.rus@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Issues with large chunk size (16Mb)
- From: Ed Spiridonov <edo.rus@xxxxxxxxx>
- Restore RAID10 with 2 "non-fresh" disks after power outage?
- From: Hannes <ghan@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V12 00/20] block: support multi-page bvec
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V12 00/20] block: support multi-page bvec
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Issues with large chunk size (16Mb)
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V12 00/20] block: support multi-page bvec
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Issues with large chunk size (16Mb)
- From: Ed Spiridonov <edo.rus@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Issues with large chunk size (16Mb)
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V12 00/20] block: support multi-page bvec
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Issues with large chunk size (16Mb)
- From: Ed Spiridonov <edo.rus@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Revive a dead md raid5 array
- From: Jogchum Reitsma <jogchum.reitsma@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V12 16/20] block: enable multipage bvecs
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Issues with large chunk size (16Mb)
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V12 16/20] block: enable multipage bvecs
- From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V12 02/20] btrfs: look at bi_size for repair decisions
- From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V12 17/20] block: always define BIO_MAX_PAGES as 256
- From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V12 18/20] block: document usage of bio iterator helpers
- From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V12 15/20] block: allow bio_for_each_segment_all() to iterate over multi-page bvec
- From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V12 14/20] bcache: avoid to use bio_for_each_segment_all() in bch_bio_alloc_pages()
- From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V12 13/20] block: loop: pass multi-page bvec to iov_iter
- From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V12 09/20] block: use bio_for_each_bvec() to compute multi-page bvec count
- From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V12 01/20] btrfs: remove various bio_offset arguments
- From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V12 06/20] block: rename bvec helpers
- From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V12 05/20] block: remove bvec_iter_rewind()
- From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V12 04/20] block: don't use bio->bi_vcnt to figure out segment number
- From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V12 03/20] block: remove the "cluster" flag
- From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V12 10/20] block: use bio_for_each_bvec() to map sg
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V12 09/20] block: use bio_for_each_bvec() to compute multi-page bvec count
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V12 18/20] block: document usage of bio iterator helpers
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V12 16/20] block: enable multipage bvecs
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V12 08/20] block: introduce bio_for_each_bvec() and rq_for_each_bvec()
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V12 07/20] block: introduce multi-page bvec helpers
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
[Index of Archives]
[Linux RAID Wiki]
[ATA RAID]
[Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]
[Linux Block]
[Linux IDE]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux Hams]
[Device Mapper]
[Kernel]
[Linux Admin]
[Linux Net]
[GFS]
[RPM]
[git]
[Yosemite Forum]
[Linux Networking]