Re: RAID6 : Sequential Write Performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Is this process going to be running all of the time, or just run for a
> few minutes/hours at a time?   If for a few minutes at a time you may
> want to use a raid0 ssd array for the data collection and then have
> another process to move that data onto the raid6.    If the data is
> split multiple files (a few gb each) then the backend process can move
> the finished files just behind the main process and if the files are
> small enough then they will still be in file cache and you won't have
> to read off of the ssd array, and you will be isolated from random
> blips on the spinning disks.  Give you are talking about 12 disks, if
> one of those spinning disk blips it will be whatever timeout you set
> on the disk assuming you have a disk that allows the timeout to be set
> (the lowest I have found for that timeout is 0.1seconds).

He did use SSDs to check this, with RAID-6, and the performance issue was the same, CPU-bound

Vennlig hilsen

roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 98013356
http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/
GPG Public key: http://karlsbakk.net/roysigurdkarlsbakk.pubkey.txt
--
Hið góða skaltu í stein höggva, hið illa í snjó rita.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux