On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 7:00 AM Michal Soltys <soltys@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 1/28/19 1:07 PM, Michal Soltys wrote: > > > > 8,0 1 269804 53.031027682 0 C D 5020472 + 1024 [0] > > 8,0 1 269805 53.040992885 0 C D 5021496 + 1024 [0] > > 8,0 1 269806 53.041155059 7185 A D 5021496 + 8 <- (9,10) 0 > > > > The time length of the whole operation actually fits pretty well - with > 32gb component disks, if each merged discard (up to 512k) incurs 10ms > penalty, that formally totals to 640s or so. How about raid10 cases? Does it merge discard to a much bigger size? Thanks, Song
