Re: XFS and RAID10 with o2 layout

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "Wols" == Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Wols> On 14/12/18 07:03, Sinisa wrote:
>>> And another MD flush thread waiting on a MD sync barrier.
>>> 
>>> Basically, this looks and smells like a MD sync barrier race
>>> condition, not an XFs problem.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> 
>>> Dave.
>> 
>> But why don't we see the same issue with other filesystems?

Wols> Possibly because, iirc, xfs is aware of the underlying raid?

I don't think it's that in touch with the raid.  It can/does query for
settings so it can optimize stuff, but I don't think it actually uses
it other than as a block device.

Wols> I don't know, but I seem to remember that from earlier discussions about
Wols> "xfs over mdraid".

Have you tried doing this with the absolute latest kernel?  



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux