Re: XFS and RAID10 with o2 layout

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 08:03:36AM +0100, Sinisa wrote:
> On 12/13/18 11:05 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 01:29:49PM +0100, Sinisa wrote:
> >Basically, this looks and smells like a MD sync barrier race
> >condition, not an XFs problem.
> 
> But why don't we see the same issue with other filesystems?

XFS has a lot more parallelism at the storage layer than other
filesystems and has a different integrity synchronisation model (via
IO completion processing rather than submission serialisation), so
it stresses the underlying storage very differently to other
filesystems.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux