Linux RAID Storage Date Index
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: [PATCH] md/raid0: Fail BIOs if their underlying block device is gone
- From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md/raid0: Fail BIOs if their underlying block device is gone
- From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md/raid0: Fail BIOs if their underlying block device is gone
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] mdadm: Introduce new array state 'broken' for raid0
- From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] md/raid0: Introduce new array state 'broken' for raid0
- From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/2] Introduce new raid0 state 'broken'
- From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md/raid0: Fail BIOs if their underlying block device is gone
- From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md/raid0: Fail BIOs if their underlying block device is gone
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] md/raid0: Fail BIOs if their underlying block device is gone
- From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md/raid1: fix a race between removing rdev and access conf->mirrors[i].rdev
- From: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md/raid1: fix a race between removing rdev and access conf->mirrors[i].rdev
- From: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md/raid1: fix a race between removing rdev and access conf->mirrors[i].rdev
- From: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md/raid1: fix a race between removing rdev and access conf->mirrors[i].rdev
- From: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md/raid1: fix a race between removing rdev and access conf->mirrors[i].rdev
- From: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: memory leak in bio_copy_user_iov
- From: Bob Liu <bob.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: memory leak in bio_copy_user_iov
- From: syzbot <syzbot+03e5c8ebd22cc6c3a8cb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] raid1: factor out a common routine to handle the completion of sync write
- From: Hou Tao <houtao1@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] md: export internal stats through debugfs
- From: Hou Tao <houtao1@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] md: export internal stats through debugfs
- From: Hou Tao <houtao1@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md/raid1: fix a race between removing rdev and access conf->mirrors[i].rdev
- From: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v1] md: Convert to use int_pow()
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] enable fail last device in raid1/10 array
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v1] md: Convert to use int_pow()
- From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v1] md: Convert to use int_pow()
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v1] md: Convert to use int_pow()
- From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md/raid1: fix a race between removing rdev and access conf->mirrors[i].rdev
- From: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] md: don't set In_sync if array is frozen
- From: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] md/raid1: fix a race between removing rdev and access conf->mirrors[i].rdev
- From: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] md: don't set In_sync if array is frozen
- From: yuyufen <yuyufen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] md: do not set suspend_hi when ->quiesce is null
- From: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] md: don't call spare_active in md_reap_sync_thread if all member devices can't work
- From: Guoqing Jiang <jgq516@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] md: don't set In_sync if array is frozen
- From: Guoqing Jiang <jgq516@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] md: allow last device to be forcibly removed from RAID1/RAID10.
- From: Guoqing Jiang <jgq516@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3] enable fail last device in raid1/10 array
- From: Guoqing Jiang <jgq516@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: slow BLKDISCARD on RAID10 md block devices
- From: Michal Soltys <soltys@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid 1 vs Raid 5 suggestion
- From: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v1] md: Convert to use int_pow()
- From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid 1 vs Raid 5 suggestion
- From: Luca Lazzarin <luca.lazzarin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid 1 vs Raid 5 suggestion
- From: "Wol's lists" <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid 1 vs Raid 5 suggestion
- From: Luca Lazzarin <luca.lazzarin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [V2 PATCH] Set R5_ReadError when there is read failure on parity disk of raid6
- From: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] md: export internal stats through debugfs
- From: Bob Liu <bob.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] md: not need error handling when device faulty
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md/raid1: remove the unnecessary plug in raid1d()
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [V2 PATCH] Set R5_ReadError when there is read failure on parity disk of raid6
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] raid1: use an int as the return value of raise_barrier()
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] md: export internal stats through debugfs
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: slow BLKDISCARD on RAID10 md block devices
- From: Coly Li <colyli@xxxxxxx>
- Re: slow BLKDISCARD on RAID10 md block devices
- From: Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: slow BLKDISCARD on RAID10 md block devices
- From: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: slow BLKDISCARD on RAID10 md block devices
- From: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] bad block is after superblock and bitmap
- From: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] bad block is after superblock and bitmap
- From: Hou Tao <houtao1@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/1] bad block is after superblock and bitmap
- From: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/1] Don't allow create ddf container on partitioned devices
- From: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] md/raid10: end bio when the device faulty
- From: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/2] md: not need error handling when device faulty
- From: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] md/raid1: end bio when the device faulty
- From: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- mdadm reports two different UUIDs on s390
- From: Nigel Croxon <ncroxon@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: slow BLKDISCARD on RAID10 md block devices
- From: Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: slow BLKDISCARD on RAID10 md block devices
- From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: slow BLKDISCARD on RAID10 md block devices
- From: pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
- Re: slow BLKDISCARD on RAID10 md block devices
- From: pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
- Re: slow BLKDISCARD on RAID10 md block devices
- From: pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
- Re: slow BLKDISCARD on RAID10 md block devices
- From: pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
- Re: slow BLKDISCARD on RAID10 md block devices
- From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: slow BLKDISCARD on RAID10 md block devices
- From: pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
- Re: slow BLKDISCARD on RAID10 md block devices
- From: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: slow BLKDISCARD on RAID10 md block devices
- From: Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- slow BLKDISCARD on RAID10 md block devices
- From: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] imsm: close removed drive fd.
- From: Mariusz Tkaczyk <mariusz.tkaczyk@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Revert "tests: wait for complete rebuild in integrity checks"
- From: <mingli.yu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weird behaviour of md, maybe a bug in 4.19.xx kernel? [SOLVED]
- From: Tito <farmatito@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weird behaviour of md, maybe a bug in 4.19.xx kernel?
- From: Tito <farmatito@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weird behaviour of md, maybe a bug in 4.19.xx kernel?
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weird behaviour of md, maybe a bug in 4.19.xx kernel?
- From: Tito <farmatito@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weird behaviour of md, maybe a bug in 4.19.xx kernel?
- From: Sarah Newman <srn@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weird behaviour of md, maybe a bug in 4.19.xx kernel?
- From: Tito <farmatito@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weird behaviour of md, maybe a bug in 4.19.xx kernel?
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Weird behaviour of md, maybe a bug in 4.19.xx kernel?
- From: Tito <farmatito@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] imsm: Change in --detail-platform for NVMe devices
- From: Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] imsm: Change in --detail-platform for NVMe devices
- From: Blazej Kucman <blazej.kucman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Regression in mdadm breaks assembling of array
- From: Stephan Diestelhorst <stephan.diestelhorst@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] mdadm: load default sysfs attributes after assemblation
- From: Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid 1 vs Raid 5 suggestion
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] mdadm: load default sysfs attributes after assemblation
- From: Mariusz Dabrowski <mariusz.dabrowski@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid 1 vs Raid 5 suggestion
- From: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid 1 vs Raid 5 suggestion
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid 1 vs Raid 5 suggestion
- From: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid 1 vs Raid 5 suggestion
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid 1 vs Raid 5 suggestion
- From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid 1 vs Raid 5 suggestion
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid 1 vs Raid 5 suggestion
- From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid 1 vs Raid 5 suggestion
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid 1 vs Raid 5 suggestion
- From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid 1 vs Raid 5 suggestion
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid 1 vs Raid 5 suggestion
- From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid 1 vs Raid 5 suggestion
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid 1 vs Raid 5 suggestion
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid 1 vs Raid 5 suggestion
- From: Luca Lazzarin <luca.lazzarin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid 1 vs Raid 5 suggestion
- From: Luca Lazzarin <luca.lazzarin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid 1 vs Raid 5 suggestion
- From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Raid 1 vs Raid 5 suggestion
- From: Luca Lazzarin <luca.lazzarin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Regression in mdadm breaks assembling of array
- From: Mariusz Dabrowski <mariusz.dabrowski@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] md/raid1: remove the unnecessary plug in raid1d()
- From: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [V2 PATCH] Set R5_ReadError when there is read failure on parity disk of raid6
- From: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Set R5_ReadError when there is read failure on parity disk of raid6
- From: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md0: bitmap file is out of date, resync
- From: Mathias G <newsnet-mg-2016@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md0: bitmap file is out of date, resync
- From: Hou Tao <houtao1@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Set R5_ReadError when there is read failure on parity disk of raid6
- From: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md-multipath: Replace a seq_printf() call by seq_putc() in multipath_status()
- From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx>
- Re: [4.19.y PATCH 1/2] block: Fix a NULL pointer dereference in generic_make_request()
- From: Guilherme Piccoli <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md-multipath: Replace a seq_printf() call by seq_putc() in multipath_status()
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [4.19.y PATCH 1/2] block: Fix a NULL pointer dereference in generic_make_request()
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] mdadm: load default sysfs attributes after assemblation
- From: Mariusz Dabrowski <mariusz.dabrowski@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [4.19.y PATCH 1/2] block: Fix a NULL pointer dereference in generic_make_request()
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [4.19.y PATCH 2/2] md/raid0: Do not bypass blocking queue entered for raid0 bios
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] raid1: use an int as the return value of raise_barrier()
- From: Hou Tao <houtao1@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 0/3] md: export internal stats through debugfs
- From: Hou Tao <houtao1@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 1/3] md-debugfs: add md_debugfs_create_files()
- From: Hou Tao <houtao1@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 2/3] md: export inflight io counters and internal stats in debugfs
- From: Hou Tao <houtao1@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 3/3] raid1: export inflight io counters and internal stats in debugfs
- From: Hou Tao <houtao1@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Enable probe_roms to scan more than 6 roms.
- From: Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Enable probe_roms to scan more than 6 roms.
- From: Roman Sobanski <roman.sobanski@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] mdadm: load default sysfs attributes after assemblation
- From: "John Stoffel" <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] md/raid: Replace a seq_printf() call by seq_putc() in three functions
- From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH] md-multipath: Replace a seq_printf() call by seq_putc() in multipath_status()
- From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx>
- [4.19.y PATCH 1/2] block: Fix a NULL pointer dereference in generic_make_request()
- From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [4.19.y PATCH 2/2] md/raid0: Do not bypass blocking queue entered for raid0 bios
- From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 14/39] docs: device-mapper: move it to the admin-guide
- From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md0: bitmap file is out of date, resync
- From: Mathias G <newsnet-mg-2016@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.1 83/95] md: fix for divide error in status_resync
- From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 51/60] md: fix for divide error in status_resync
- From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 28/35] md: fix for divide error in status_resync
- From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 18/21] md: fix for divide error in status_resync
- From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.4 11/12] md: fix for divide error in status_resync
- From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] fix for md-next 20190626
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL] fix for md-next 20190626
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md/raid1: Fix a warning message in remove_wb()
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] md/raid1: Fix a warning message in remove_wb()
- From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] mdadm: load default sysfs attributes after assemblation
- From: Mariusz Dabrowski <mariusz.dabrowski@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md0: bitmap file is out of date, resync
- From: Mathias G <newsnet-mg-2016@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] md-next 20190620
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL] md-next 20190620
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] Fix potential data inconsistency issue with write behind device
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: WARNING: CPU: 13 PID: 3786 at drivers/md/raid5.c:4611 break_stripe_batch_list+0x86/0x1fb
- From: Nigel Croxon <ncroxon@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/5 V2] md/raid1: fix potential data inconsistency issue with write behind device
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- raid6 with dm-integrity should not cause device to fail
- From: Nigel Croxon <ncroxon@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/5 V2] md/raid1: fix potential data inconsistency issue with write behind device
- From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/5 V2] md/raid1: fix potential data inconsistency issue with write behind device
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/5 V2] md/raid1: fix potential data inconsistency issue with write behind device
- From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/5] md/raid1: fix potential data inconsistency issue with write behind device
- From: Nikolay Kichukov <hijacker@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/5] md/raid1: fix potential data inconsistency issue with write behind device
- From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/5] md/raid1: fix potential data inconsistency issue with write behind device
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/5] md/raid1: fix potential data inconsistency issue with write behind device
- From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] md fixes 20190618
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md: fix for divide error in status_resync
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL] md fixes 20190618
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/5] md/raid1: fix potential data inconsistency issue with write behind device
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/5] md/raid1: fix potential data inconsistency issue with write behind device
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/5] md/raid1: fix potential data inconsistency issue with write behind device
- From: Nikolay Kichukov <hijacker@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/5] md/raid1: fix potential data inconsistency issue with write behind device
- From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/5] md/raid1: fix potential data inconsistency issue with write behind device
- From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/5] md/raid1: fix potential data inconsistency issue with write behind device
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/5] md/raid1: fix potential data inconsistency issue with write behind device
- From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-6 aborted reshape
- From: Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md0: bitmap file is out of date, resync
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md0: bitmap file is out of date, resync
- From: Mathias G <newsnet-mg-2016@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/8] md: for-5.3 changes
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: RAID-6 aborted reshape
- From: Colt Boyd <coltboyd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md0: bitmap file is out of date, resync
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- md0: bitmap file is out of date, resync
- From: Mathias G <newsnet-mg-2016@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 8/8] md/raid10: read balance chooses idlest disk for SSD
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 7/8] md: raid1-10: Unify r{1,10}bio_pool_free
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 6/8] md: raid10: Use struct_size() in kmalloc()
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/8] md/raid1: get rid of extra blank line and space
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/8] md: fix spelling typo and add necessary space
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/8] md: md.c: Return -ENODEV when mddev is NULL in rdev_attr_show
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/8] raid5-cache: Need to do start() part job after adding journal device
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/8] drivers: md: Unify common definitions of raid1 and raid10
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/8] md: for-5.3 changes
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/5] md/raid1: fix potential data inconsistency issue with write behind device
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md: fix for divide error in status_resync
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V2] md/raid10: read balance chooses idlest disk for SSD
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/5] md-bitmap: create and destroy wb_info_pool with the change of backlog
- From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/5] md-bitmap: create and destroy wb_info_pool with the change of bitmap
- From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/5] md: add bitmap_abort label in md_run
- From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/5] md: introduce mddev_create/destroy_wb_pool for the change of member device
- From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/5] Fix potential data inconsistency issue with write behind device
- From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/5] md/raid1: fix potential data inconsistency issue with write behind device
- From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: WARNING: CPU: 13 PID: 3786 at drivers/md/raid5.c:4611 break_stripe_batch_list+0x86/0x1fb
- From: Marc Smith <msmith626@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V2] md/raid10: read balance chooses idlest disk for SSD
- From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] md: fix for divide error in status_resync
- From: Mariusz Tkaczyk <mariusz.tkaczyk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] md/raid0: Do not bypass blocking queue entered for raid0 bios
- From: Guilherme Piccoli <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] md/raid0: Do not bypass blocking queue entered for raid0 bios
- From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] md/raid0: Do not bypass blocking queue entered for raid0 bios
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] md/raid0: Do not bypass blocking queue entered for raid0 bios
- From: Guilherme Piccoli <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] md/raid0: Do not bypass blocking queue entered for raid0 bios
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] md/raid0: Do not bypass blocking queue entered for raid0 bios
- From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] md/raid0: Do not bypass blocking queue entered for raid0 bios
- From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: Fix a NULL pointer dereference in generic_make_request()
- From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] md/raid0: Do not bypass blocking queue entered for raid0 bios
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] md/raid0: Do not bypass blocking queue entered for raid0 bios
- From: Guilherme Piccoli <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-6 aborted reshape
- From: Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mdadm: /dev/dm-4 not large enough to join array
- From: listmailer273 <listmailer273@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-6 aborted reshape
- From: Colt Boyd <coltboyd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-6 aborted reshape
- From: Colt Boyd <coltboyd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-6 aborted reshape
- From: Colt Boyd <coltboyd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md/raid10: read balance chooses idlest disk for SSD
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md/raid10: read balance chooses idlest disk for SSD
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] raid5-cache: Need to do start() part job after adding journal device
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md/raid10: read balance chooses idlest disk for SSD
- Re: RAID-6 aborted reshape
- From: Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-6 aborted reshape
- From: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md/raid10: read balance chooses idlest disk for SSD
- From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md/raid10: read balance chooses idlest disk for SSD
- [PATCH] md/raid10: read balance chooses idlest disk for SSD
- From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
- RAID5 R5_Wantread BUG_ON in fetch_block
- From: Fisher <fisherthepooh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: RAID-6 aborted reshape
- From: Colt Boyd <coltboyd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] raid5-cache: Need to do start() part job after adding journal device
- From: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RAID-6 aborted reshape
- From: Colt Boyd <coltboyd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-1 can (sometimes) be 3x faster than RAID-10
- From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-1 can (sometimes) be 3x faster than RAID-10
- From: Sarah Newman <srn@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-1 can (sometimes) be 3x faster than RAID-10
- From: Andy Smith <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md: raid10: Use struct_size() in kmalloc()
- From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md: raid10: Use struct_size() in kmalloc()
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] md: fix spelling typo and remove extra blank line
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md: md.c: Return -ENODEV when mddev is NULL in rdev_attr_show
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] raid5-cache: Need to do start() part job after adding journal device
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] md/raid1: get rid of extra blank line and space
- From: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] md: fix spelling typo and add necessary space
- From: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/2] md: fix spelling typo and remove extra blank line
- From: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] md: raid10: Use struct_size() in kmalloc()
- From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lost software raid information
- From: Volker Lieder <v.lieder@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-1 can (sometimes) be 3x faster than RAID-10
- From: Andy Smith <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-1 can (sometimes) be 3x faster than RAID-10
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-1 can (sometimes) be 3x faster than RAID-10
- From: Kai Stian Olstad <raid+list@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-1 can (sometimes) be 3x faster than RAID-10
- Re: RAID-1 can (sometimes) be 3x faster than RAID-10
- From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-1 can (sometimes) be 3x faster than RAID-10
- Re: RAID-1 can (sometimes) be 3x faster than RAID-10
- From: Andy Smith <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-1 can (sometimes) be 3x faster than RAID-10
- From: Andy Smith <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-1 can (sometimes) be 3x faster than RAID-10
- From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-1 can (sometimes) be 3x faster than RAID-10
- Re: RAID-1 can (sometimes) be 3x faster than RAID-10
- From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.4 38/56] md: add mddev->pers to avoid potential NULL pointer dereference
- From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-1 can (sometimes) be 3x faster than RAID-10
- Re: RAID-1 can (sometimes) be 3x faster than RAID-10
- From: Andy Smith <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH V3] mdadm/md.4: add the descriptions for bitmap sysfs nodes
- From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-1 can (sometimes) be 3x faster than RAID-10
- From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-1 can (sometimes) be 3x faster than RAID-10
- From: Andy Smith <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-1 can (sometimes) be 3x faster than RAID-10
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-1 can (sometimes) be 3x faster than RAID-10
- From: Andy Smith <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-1 can (sometimes) be 3x faster than RAID-10
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-1 can (sometimes) be 3x faster than RAID-10
- Re: RAID-1 can (sometimes) be 3x faster than RAID-10
- Re: RAID-1 can (sometimes) be 3x faster than RAID-10
- From: Andy Smith <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-1 can (sometimes) be 3x faster than RAID-10
- Re: RAID-1 can (sometimes) be 3x faster than RAID-10
- From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-1 can (sometimes) be 3x faster than RAID-10
- Re: RAID-1 can (sometimes) be 3x faster than RAID-10
- Re: RAID-1 can (sometimes) be 3x faster than RAID-10
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-1 can (sometimes) be 3x faster than RAID-10
- From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-1 can (sometimes) be 3x faster than RAID-10
- From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-1 can (sometimes) be 3x faster than RAID-10
- Re: RAID-1 can (sometimes) be 3x faster than RAID-10
- From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-1 can (sometimes) be 3x faster than RAID-10
- Re: [RFC PATCH V2] mdadm/md.4: add the descriptions for bitmap sysfs nodes
- From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
- RAID-1 can (sometimes) be 3x faster than RAID-10
- From: Andy Smith <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Optimising raid on 4k devices
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Few questions about (attempting to use) write journal + call traces
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Few questions about (attempting to use) write journal + call traces
- From: Michal Soltys <soltys@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH V2] mdadm/md.4: add the descriptions for bitmap sysfs nodes
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Optimising raid on 4k devices
- From: michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Optimising raid on 4k devices
- From: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Optimising raid on 4k devices
- From: "Wol's lists" <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] raid5-cache: Need to do start() part job after adding journal device
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Few questions about (attempting to use) write journal + call traces
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Optimising raid on 4k devices
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/1] raid5-cache: Need to do start() part job after adding journal device
- From: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Few questions about (attempting to use) write journal + call traces
- From: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Few questions about (attempting to use) write journal + call traces
- From: Michal Soltys <soltys@xxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH V2] mdadm/md.4: add the descriptions for bitmap sysfs nodes
- From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] mdadm/md.4: add the descriptions for bitmap sysfs nodes
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
- Optimising raid on 4k devices
- From: Matthew Moore <matthew@moore.sydney>
- Re: help recovering raid5 after degraded to 2 disks and then i/o errors on 1 of the 2
- From: Emmanouil Kapernaros <manolis@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: BUG: RAID6 recovery broken by commit 4f4fd7c5798bbdd5a03a60f6269cf1177fbd11ef (Linux 5.1.3)
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Few questions about (attempting to use) write journal + call traces
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] mdadm: use pkgconfig to find systemd unit dir
- From: luca.boccassi@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Few questions about (attempting to use) write journal + call traces
- From: Michal Soltys <soltys@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: BUG: RAID6 recovery broken by commit 4f4fd7c5798bbdd5a03a60f6269cf1177fbd11ef (Linux 5.1.3)
- From: Thorsten Knabe <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] md: md.c: Return -ENODEV when mddev is NULL in rdev_attr_show
- From: Marcos Paulo de Souza <marcos.souza.org@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] block: Fix a NULL pointer dereference in generic_make_request()
- From: Guilherme Piccoli <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fix bad backport to stable v3.16+
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- Re: Few questions about (attempting to use) write journal + call traces
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fix bad backport to stable v3.16+
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: Fix a NULL pointer dereference in generic_make_request()
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] md/raid0: Do not bypass blocking queue entered for raid0 bios
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] block: Fix a NULL pointer dereference in generic_make_request()
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] block: Fix a NULL pointer dereference in generic_make_request()
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] block: Fix a NULL pointer dereference in generic_make_request()
- From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Few questions about (attempting to use) write journal + call traces
- From: Michal Soltys <soltys@xxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH] mdadm/md.4: add the descriptions for bitmap sysfs nodes
- From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Few questions about (attempting to use) write journal + call traces
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: BUG: RAID6 recovery broken by commit 4f4fd7c5798bbdd5a03a60f6269cf1177fbd11ef (Linux 5.1.3)
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Fix bad backport to stable v3.16+
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- Re: BUG: RAID6 recovery broken by commit 4f4fd7c5798bbdd5a03a60f6269cf1177fbd11ef (Linux 5.1.3)
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Few questions about (attempting to use) write journal + call traces
- From: Michal Soltys <soltys@xxxxxxxx>
- BUG: RAID6 recovery broken by commit 4f4fd7c5798bbdd5a03a60f6269cf1177fbd11ef (Linux 5.1.3)
- From: Thorsten Knabe <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] md/raid0: Do not bypass blocking queue entered for raid0 bios
- From: Guilherme Piccoli <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] md/raid0: Do not bypass blocking queue entered for raid0 bios
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] md/raid0: Do not bypass blocking queue entered for raid0 bios
- From: Guilherme Piccoli <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] md/raid0: Do not bypass blocking queue entered for raid0 bios
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] block: Fix a NULL pointer dereference in generic_make_request()
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] block: Fix a NULL pointer dereference in generic_make_request()
- From: Guilherme Piccoli <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] drivers: md: Unify common definitions of raid1 and raid10
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] block: Fix a NULL pointer dereference in generic_make_request()
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] md: raid0: Remove return statement from void function
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V2 2/2] md/raid0: Do not bypass blocking queue entered for raid0 bios
- From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V2 1/2] block: Fix a NULL pointer dereference in generic_make_request()
- From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/4] md: raid0: Return md_integrity_register result directly
- From: Marcos Paulo de Souza <marcos.souza.org@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/4] md: raid0: Make ret local in raid0_run
- From: Marcos Paulo de Souza <marcos.souza.org@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/4] md: raid0: Remove return statement from void function
- From: Marcos Paulo de Souza <marcos.souza.org@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/4] md: raid1-10: Unify r{1,10}bio_pool_free
- From: Marcos Paulo de Souza <marcos.souza.org@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] md/raid0: Do not bypass blocking queue entered for raid0 bios
- From: Guilherme Piccoli <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] mdmon: fix wrong array state when disk fails during mdmon startup
- From: Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] md/raid0: Do not bypass blocking queue entered for raid0 bios
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: Fix a NULL pointer dereference in generic_make_request()
- From: Eric Ren <renzhengeek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is --write-mostly supposed to do anything for SSD- and NVMe-class devices?
- From: Andy Smith <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is --write-mostly supposed to do anything for SSD- and NVMe-class devices?
- From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: Fix a NULL pointer dereference in generic_make_request()
- From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@xxxxxxxxx>
- Is --write-mostly supposed to do anything for SSD- and NVMe-class devices?
- From: Andy Smith <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] md/raid0: Do not bypass blocking queue entered for raid0 bios
- From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: Fix a NULL pointer dereference in generic_make_request()
- From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: Fix a NULL pointer dereference in generic_make_request()
- From: Eric Ren <renzhengeek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] drivers: md: Unify common definitions of raid1 and raid10
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] drivers: md: Unify common definitions of raid1 and raid10
- From: Marcos Paulo de Souza <marcos.souza.org@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help restoring a raid10 Array (4 disk + one spare) after a hard disk failure at power on
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help restoring a raid10 Array (4 disk + one spare) after a hard disk failure at power on
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help restoring a raid10 Array (4 disk + one spare) after a hard disk failure at power on
- From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help restoring a raid10 Array (4 disk + one spare) after a hard disk failure at power on
- From: Eric Valette <eric.valette@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Help restoring a raid10 Array (4 disk + one spare) after a hard disk failure at power on
- From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help restoring a raid10 Array (4 disk + one spare) after a hard disk failure at power on
- From: Julien ROBIN <julien.robin28@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Help restoring a raid10 Array (4 disk + one spare) after a hard disk failure at power on
- From: Eric Valette <eric.valette@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Help restoring a raid10 Array (4 disk + one spare) after a hard disk failure at power on
- From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help restoring a raid10 Array (4 disk + one spare) after a hard disk failure at power on
- From: Eric Valette <eric.valette@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Help restoring a raid10 Array (4 disk + one spare) after a hard disk failure at power on
- From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help restoring a raid10 Array (4 disk + one spare) after a hard disk failure at power on
- From: Eric Valette <eric.valette@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Help restoring a raid10 Array (4 disk + one spare) after a hard disk failure at power on
- From: Julien ROBIN <julien.robin28@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Help restoring a raid10 Array (4 disk + one spare) after a hard disk failure at power on
- From: Eric Valette <eric.valette@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Help restoring a raid10 Array (4 disk + one spare) after a hard disk failure at power on
- From: Julien ROBIN <julien.robin28@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Help restoring a raid10 Array (4 disk + one spare) after a hard disk failure at power on
- From: Eric Valette <eric.valette@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Help restoring a raid10 Array (4 disk + one spare) after a hard disk failure at power on
- From: Feng Zhang <prod.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Help restoring a raid10 Array (4 disk + one spare) after a hard disk failure at power on
- From: Eric Valette <eric.valette@xxxxxxx>
- Re: ID 5 Reallocated Sectors Count
- From: Nix <nix@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] raid5-cache: rename r5l_flush_stripe_to_raid to r5l_flush_stripe_to_journal
- From: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: best way to replace all disks
- From: Gandalf Corvotempesta <gandalf.corvotempesta@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ID 5 Reallocated Sectors Count
- From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] raid5-cache: rename r5l_flush_stripe_to_raid to r5l_flush_stripe_to_journal
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] raid5-cache: rename r5l_flush_stripe_to_raid to r5l_flush_stripe_to_journal
- From: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
- recovering a single device RAID
- From: "Boylan, Ross" <Ross.Boylan@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] raid5-cache: rename r5l_flush_stripe_to_raid to r5l_flush_stripe_to_journal
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- Re: ID 5 Reallocated Sectors Count
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/1] raid5-cache: rename r5l_flush_stripe_to_raid to r5l_flush_stripe_to_journal
- From: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ID 5 Reallocated Sectors Count
- From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] drivers: md: Unify common definitions of raid1 and raid10
- From: Marcos Paulo de Souza <marcos.souza.org@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ID 5 Reallocated Sectors Count
- From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Spare pool documentation
- From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Spare pool documentation
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: ID 5 Reallocated Sectors Count
- From: Mark Wagner <carnildo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ID 5 Reallocated Sectors Count
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ID 5 Reallocated Sectors Count
- From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ID 5 Reallocated Sectors Count
- From: Julien ROBIN <julien.robin28@xxxxxxx>
- Re: ID 5 Reallocated Sectors Count
- From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ID 5 Reallocated Sectors Count
- From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ID 5 Reallocated Sectors Count
- From: Julien ROBIN <julien.robin28@xxxxxxx>
- Re: ID 5 Reallocated Sectors Count
- From: Eyal Lebedinsky <eyal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- ID 5 Reallocated Sectors Count
- From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] md/raid0: Do not bypass blocking queue entered for raid0 bios
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] md/raid0: Do not bypass blocking queue entered for raid0 bios
- From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <guilherme@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] md/raid0: Do not bypass blocking queue entered for raid0 bios
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] md/raid0: Do not bypass blocking queue entered for raid0 bios
- From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Spare pool documentation
- From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] mdmon: fix wrong array state when disk fails during mdmon startup
- From: Artur Paszkiewicz <artur.paszkiewicz@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Locating slow drives
- From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Locating slow drives
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Locating slow drives
- From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] md/raid0: Do not bypass blocking queue entered for raid0 bios
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] md/raid0: Do not bypass blocking queue entered for raid0 bios
- From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: New complete guide for irreversible mdadm failures recovery
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] md/raid0: Do not bypass blocking queue entered for raid0 bios
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid1 syncing every Sunday morning.
- From: "Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI" <renaud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md: properly lock and unlock in rdev_attr_store()
- From: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid1 syncing every Sunday morning.
- From: Rudy Zijlstra <rudy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid1 syncing every Sunday morning.
- From: Andy Smith <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Raid1 syncing every Sunday morning.
- From: "Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI" <renaud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- New complete guide for irreversible mdadm failures recovery
- From: Julien ROBIN <julien.robin28@xxxxxxx>
- Working 2 disks RAID0 : failed mdadm --add command : problem at reboot
- From: Julien ROBIN <julien.robin28@xxxxxxx>
- Re: best way to replace all disks
- From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 mdadm --grow wrote nothing (Reshape Status : 0% complete) and cannot assemble anymore
- From: Julien ROBIN <julien.robin28@xxxxxxx>
- Re: WARNING: CPU: 13 PID: 3786 at drivers/md/raid5.c:4611 break_stripe_batch_list+0x86/0x1fb
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- WARNING: CPU: 13 PID: 3786 at drivers/md/raid5.c:4611 break_stripe_batch_list+0x86/0x1fb
- From: Marc Smith <msmith626@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH V2 0/1] Introduce emergency raid0 stop for mounted arrays
- From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 mdadm --grow wrote nothing (Reshape Status : 0% complete) and cannot assemble anymore
- From: Julien ROBIN <julien.robin28@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH V2 0/1] Introduce emergency raid0 stop for mounted arrays
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 mdadm --grow wrote nothing (Reshape Status : 0% complete) and cannot assemble anymore
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 mdadm --grow wrote nothing (Reshape Status : 0% complete) and cannot assemble anymore
- From: Julien ROBIN <julien.robin28@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 mdadm --grow wrote nothing (Reshape Status : 0% complete) and cannot assemble anymore
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: Fix a NULL pointer dereference in generic_make_request()
- From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH V2 0/1] Introduce emergency raid0 stop for mounted arrays
- From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] md/raid0: Do not bypass blocking queue entered for raid0 bios
- From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] block: Fix a NULL pointer dereference in generic_make_request()
- From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 mdadm --grow wrote nothing (Reshape Status : 0% complete) and cannot assemble anymore
- From: Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 mdadm --grow wrote nothing (Reshape Status : 0% complete) and cannot assemble anymore
- From: Julien ROBIN <julien.robin28@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 mdadm --grow wrote nothing (Reshape Status : 0% complete) and cannot assemble anymore
- From: Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 mdadm --grow wrote nothing (Reshape Status : 0% complete) and cannot assemble anymore
- From: Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 mdadm --grow wrote nothing (Reshape Status : 0% complete) and cannot assemble anymore
- From: Julien ROBIN <julien.robin28@xxxxxxx>
- RAID5 mdadm --grow wrote nothing (Reshape Status : 0% complete) and cannot assemble anymore
- From: Julien ROBIN <julien.robin28@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md: properly lock and unlock in rdev_attr_store()
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md: properly lock and unlock in rdev_attr_store()
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] md: properly lock and unlock in rdev_attr_store()
- From: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lost software raid information
- From: "Wol's lists" <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: best way to replace all disks
- From: "Wol's lists" <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Unexpected difference between a 4-disk RAID5 and a 3-disk RAID5 reshaped into a 4-disk RAID5
- From: Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Unexpected difference between a 4-disk RAID5 and a 3-disk RAID5 reshaped into a 4-disk RAID5
- From: pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
- Unexpected difference between a 4-disk RAID5 and a 3-disk RAID5 reshaped into a 4-disk RAID5
- From: David Shaw <dshaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lost software raid information
- From: Volker Lieder <v.lieder@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lost software raid information
- From: Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lost software raid information
- From: Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lost software raid information
- From: Volker Lieder <v.lieder@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lost software raid information
- From: Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- lost software raid information
- From: Volker Lieder <v.lieder@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Assemble: print error message if mdadm fails assembling with --uuid option
- From: Jinpu Wang <jinpu.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: best way to replace all disks
- From: Gandalf Corvotempesta <gandalf.corvotempesta@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: best way to replace all disks
- From: pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
- Re: best way to replace all disks
- From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] md-next 2019-04-19
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: best way to replace all disks
- From: Gandalf Corvotempesta <gandalf.corvotempesta@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: best way to replace all disks
- From: Gandalf Corvotempesta <gandalf.corvotempesta@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: best way to replace all disks
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: best way to replace all disks
- From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: best way to replace all disks
- From: Feng Zhang <prod.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: best way to replace all disks
- From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: best way to replace all disks
- From: Gandalf Corvotempesta <gandalf.corvotempesta@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: best way to replace all disks
- From: Gandalf Corvotempesta <gandalf.corvotempesta@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: best way to replace all disks
- From: Carsten Aulbert <carsten.aulbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: best way to replace all disks
- From: Gandalf Corvotempesta <gandalf.corvotempesta@xxxxxxxxx>
- best way to replace all disks
- From: Gandalf Corvotempesta <gandalf.corvotempesta@xxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL] md-next 2019-04-19
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH V2 0/1] Introduce emergency raid0 stop for mounted arrays
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC] [PATCH V2 1/1] md/raid0: Introduce emergency stop for raid0 arrays
- From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC] [PATCH V2 0/1] Introduce emergency raid0 stop for mounted arrays
- From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Nigel Croxon <ncroxon@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Nigel Croxon <ncroxon@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Nigel Croxon <ncroxon@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Assemble: print error message if mdadm fails assembling with --uuid option
- From: Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Nigel Croxon <ncroxon@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Nigel Croxon <ncroxon@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] udev: Add udev rules to create by-partuuid for md device
- From: Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@xxxxxxxxx>
- "echo frozen > /sys/block/md0/md/sync_action" locks up an array entirely
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Replacing a member disk in RAID0
- From: Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Replacing a member disk in RAID0
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Replacing a member disk in RAID0
- From: Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Replacing a member disk in RAID0
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Replacing a member disk in RAID0
- From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxx>
- Replacing a member disk in RAID0
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] udev: Add udev rules to create by-partuuid for md device
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] udev: Add udev rules to create by-partuuid for md device
- From: Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: reduce number of devices in raid6
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] md: return -ENODEV if rdev has no mddev assigned
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] md: return -ENODEV if rdev has no mddev assigned
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: reduce number of devices in raid6
- From: Eyal Lebedinsky <eyal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: reduce number of devices in raid6
- From: "Wol's lists" <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] md: return -ENODEV if rdev has no mddev assigned
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] md: return -ENODEV if rdev has no mddev assigned
- From: Pawel Baldysiak <pawel.baldysiak@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: reduce number of devices in raid6
- From: Eyal Lebedinsky <eyal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: reduce number of devices in raid6
- From: Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Degraded RAID-6 array reassembling as a RAID-0 array
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Degraded RAID-6 array reassembling as a RAID-0 array
- From: Mark Wagner <carnildo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md/raid0: don't use line[200] to store zone info
- From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Degraded RAID-6 array reassembling as a RAID-0 array
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [HELP] md/raid5: do we really avoid reading from known bad blocks ?
- From: "jianchao.wang" <jianchao.w.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] md fixes/changes for 5.2
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL] md fixes/changes for 5.2
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] md: return -ENODEV if rdev has no mddev assigned
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [HELP] md/raid5: do we really avoid reading from known bad blocks ?
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md/raid0: don't use line[200] to store zone info
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Degraded RAID-6 array reassembling as a RAID-0 array
- From: Mark Wagner <carnildo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Nigel Croxon <ncroxon@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Create: Block rounding size to max
- From: Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] imsm: fix spare activation for old matrix arrays
- From: Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] md: return -ENODEV if rdev has no mddev assigned
- From: Pawel Baldysiak <pawel.baldysiak@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] imsm: fix spare activation for old matrix arrays
- From: Pawel Baldysiak <pawel.baldysiak@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] md/raid0: don't use line[200] to store zone info
- From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
- reduce number of devices in raid6
- From: Eyal Lebedinsky <eyal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re[20]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [HELP] md/raid5: do we really avoid reading from known bad blocks ?
- From: "jianchao.wang" <jianchao.w.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: John Stoffel <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Nigel Croxon <ncroxon@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: "John Stoffel" <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [HELP] md/raid5: do we really avoid reading from known bad blocks ?
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- [HELP] md/raid5: do we really avoid reading from known bad blocks ?
- From: "jianchao.wang" <jianchao.w.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: One more newbee question:
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- One more newbee question:
- From: "Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI" <renaud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: OT: Processor recommendation
- From: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: OT: Processor recommendation
- From: Leslie Rhorer <lrhorer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- OT: Processor recommendation
- From: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/7] md: add a missing endianess conversion in check_sb_changes
- From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5/7] md: mark md_cluster_mod static
- From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: a bunch of MD raid fixes
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- seagate ST12000NM0007 disk issue
- From: Eyal Lebedinsky <eyal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re[18]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re[18]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re[18]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: no_spam@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re[16]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 7/7] md: add __acquires/__releases annotations to handle_active_stripes
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 6/7] md: add __acquires/__releases annotations to (un)lock_two_stripes
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/7] md: mark md_cluster_mod static
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/7] md: use correct type in super_1_sync
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/7] md: use correct type in super_1_load
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/7] md: use correct types in md_bitmap_print_sb
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/7] md: add a missing endianess conversion in check_sb_changes
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- a bunch of MD raid fixes
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Nigel Croxon <ncroxon@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Nigel Croxon <ncroxon@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re[16]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: no_spam@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] md: add mddev->pers to avoid potential NULL pointer dereference
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] md: add mddev->pers to avoid potential NULL pointer dereference
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] md: add mddev->pers to avoid potential NULL pointer dereference
- From: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md: add mddev->pers to avoid potential NULL pointer dereference
- From: yuyufen <yuyufen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md: add mddev->pers to avoid potential NULL pointer dereference
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] md: add mddev->pers to avoid potential NULL pointer dereference
- From: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Create: Block rounding size to max
- From: Mariusz Tkaczyk <mariusz.tkaczyk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help needed: RAID5 with two apparent simo drive failures
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help needed: RAID5 with two apparent simo drive failures
- From: "Jorge R. Frank" <jrfrank@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help needed: RAID5 with two apparent simo drive failures
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Help needed: RAID5 with two apparent simo drive failures
- From: "Jorge R. Frank" <jrfrank@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Question about Intel RST, NVMe SSDs and mdadm
- From: Raphaël Halimi <raphael.halimi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] md fixes and improvements
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] Revert "MD: fix lock contention for flush bios"
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] md: batch flush requests.
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3] md fixes and improvements
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- Re: Question about Intel RST, NVMe SSDs and mdadm
- From: Artur Paszkiewicz <artur.paszkiewicz@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] md: change approach to parallel flush requests.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
- Question about Intel RST, NVMe SSDs and mdadm
- From: Raphaël Halimi <raphael.halimi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] md: change approach to parallel flush requests.
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] md: change approach to parallel flush requests.
- From: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] md: change approach to parallel flush requests.
- From: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] md: change approach to parallel flush requests.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/1] md: return -ENODEV if rdev has no mddev assigned
- From: Pawel Baldysiak <pawel.baldysiak@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] md: change approach to parallel flush requests.
- From: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] Revert "MD: fix lock contention for flush bios"
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/2] md: change approach to parallel flush requests.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] md: batch flush requests.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re[14]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state
- From: Nigel Croxon <ncroxon@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] udev: Add udev rules to create by-partuuid for md device
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
- Re[14]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: no_spam@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH] udev: Add udev rules to create by-partuuid for md device
- From: Liwei Song <liwei.song@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] udev: Add udev rules to create by-partuuid for md device
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC] md/raid1: fix deadlock between freeze_array() and wait_barrier().
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md:MD_CLOSING needs to be cleared after called md_set_readonly or do_md_stop
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] udev: Add udev rules to create by-partuuid for md device
- From: Liwei Song <liwei.song@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md:MD_CLOSING needs to be cleared after called md_set_readonly or do_md_stop
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md:MD_CLOSING needs to be cleared after called md_set_readonly or do_md_stop
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 4tb NAS drive recommendation
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] md changes for 5.1
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: troubleshooting RAID-1 array break+resync on boot after upgrades to linux kernel v5.0.x ?
- From: PGNet Dev <pgnet.dev@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: troubleshooting RAID-1 array break+resync on boot after upgrades to linux kernel v5.0.x ?
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- troubleshooting RAID-1 array break+resync on boot after upgrades to linux kernel v5.0.x ?
- From: PGNet Dev <pgnet.dev@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 4tb NAS drive recommendation
- From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 4tb NAS drive recommendation
- From: "John Stoffel" <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL] md changes for 5.1
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md: Fix failed allocation of md_register_thread
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] It's wrong to add len to sector_nr in raid10 reshape twice
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] raid5: set write hint for PPL
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Brad Campbell <lists2009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] raid5: set write hint for PPL
- From: "Dabrowski, Mariusz" <mariusz.dabrowski@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 4tb NAS drive recommendation
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 4tb NAS drive recommendation
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 4tb NAS drive recommendation
- From: "John Stoffel" <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Kai Stian Olstad <raid+list@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Nix <nix@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Nix <nix@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Brad Campbell <lists2009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re[13]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: "Wol's lists" <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Andy Smith <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re[13]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: no_spam@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Leslie Rhorer <lrhorer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re[11]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Leslie Rhorer <lrhorer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Kent Dorfman <kent.dorfman766@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Leslie Rhorer <lrhorer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Leslie Rhorer <lrhorer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid 5 painfully slow with linux 5.0.0
- From: Michael Leun <linux-raid-20190308@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Kent Dorfman <kent.dorfman766@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- smart short test crashes software raid array?
- From: Kent Dorfman <kent.dorfman766@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re[11]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: no_spam@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Re[9]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re[9]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re[8]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re[8]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Raid 5 painfully slow with linux 5.0.0
- From: linux-raid-20190308@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 1/1] It's wrong to add len to sector_nr in raid10 reshape twice
- From: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/1] imsm: fix spare activation for old matrix arrays
- From: Pawel Baldysiak <pawel.baldysiak@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] raid5: set write hint for PPL
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re[9]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: no_spam@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re[8]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: no_spam@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Re[6]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re[6]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: no_spam@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH] md: Fix failed allocation of md_register_thread
- From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] raid5: set write hint for PPL
- From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re[4]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re[4]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] raid5: set write hint for PPL
- From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
- Re[2]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: no_spam@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH v2] raid5: set write hint for PPL
- From: "Dabrowski, Mariusz" <mariusz.dabrowski@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re[2]: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Linux Raid + BTRFS: rookie mistake ... dd bs=1M
- From: zittware@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH] md: Fix failed allocation of md_register_thread
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] md: Fix failed allocation of md_register_thread
- From: Aditya Pakki <pakki001@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] add missing units to --examine
- From: Corey Hickey <bugfood-ml@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid5 four drives missing
- From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] add missing units to --examine
- From: Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] Assemble: Fix starting array with initial reshape checkpoint
- From: Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V2] mdmon: wait for previous mdmon to exit during takeover
- From: Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] mdmon: don't attempt to manage new arrays when terminating
- From: Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm RAID10 configuration - performance
- Re: [PATCH V15 14/18] block: enable multipage bvecs
- From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V15 14/18] block: enable multipage bvecs
- From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V15 14/18] block: enable multipage bvecs
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V15 14/18] block: enable multipage bvecs
- From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid5 reshape stuck - md0 process hang
- From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid5 reshape stuck - md0 process hang
- From: Brian <search@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid5 reshape stuck - md0 process hang
- From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid5 reshape stuck - md0 process hang
- From: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 reshape is stuck when raid5 journal device miss
- From: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 reshape is stuck when raid5 journal device miss
- From: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
- mdadm RAID10 configuration - performance
- From: Guillermo F <guillefraz@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid5 reshape stuck - md0 process hang
- From: "search@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <search@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Raid5 reshape stuck - md0 process hang
- From: "search@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <search@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Raid5 stuck at reshape - md0 process hangs
- From: "search@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <search@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: AW: [PATCH] lib/raid6: possibly use different gen and xor algorithms.,
- From: Hristo Venev <hristo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- AW: [PATCH] lib/raid6: possibly use different gen and xor algorithms.,
- From: Markus Stockhausen <stockhausen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] lib/raid6: possibly use different gen and xor algorithms.,
- From: Hristo Venev <hristo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid5 four drives missing
- From: Romulo Albuquerque <romulo.albuquerque@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V2] mdmon: wait for previous mdmon to exit during takeover
- From: Pawel Baldysiak <pawel.baldysiak@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/1] Assemble: Fix starting array with initial reshape checkpoint
- From: Pawel Baldysiak <pawel.baldysiak@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] mdmon: don't attempt to manage new arrays when terminating
- From: Artur Paszkiewicz <artur.paszkiewicz@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V15 14/18] block: enable multipage bvecs
- From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V15 14/18] block: enable multipage bvecs
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V15 14/18] block: enable multipage bvecs
- From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V15 14/18] block: enable multipage bvecs
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V15 14/18] block: enable multipage bvecs
- From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V15 14/18] block: enable multipage bvecs
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V15 14/18] block: enable multipage bvecs
- From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: RAID6 : Sequential Write Performance
- From: Jean De Gyns <Jean.DeGyns@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH V15 00/18] block: support multi-page bvec
- From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH V15 00/18] block: support multi-page bvec
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 : Sequential Write Performance
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 : Sequential Write Performance
- From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 : Sequential Write Performance
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 : Sequential Write Performance
- From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 out of sync, but which files are affected?
- From: "David C. Rankin" <drankinatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid5 four drives missing
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 : Sequential Write Performance
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: RAID6 : Sequential Write Performance
- From: Jean De Gyns <Jean.DeGyns@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] mdmon: wait for previous mdmon to exit during takeover
- From: Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: RAID6 : Sequential Write Performance
- From: Jean De Gyns <Jean.DeGyns@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH V15 00/18] block: support multi-page bvec
- From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid5 four drives missing
- From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] mdmon: wait for previous mdmon to exit during takeover
- From: Pawel Baldysiak <pawel.baldysiak@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid5 four drives missing
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Raid5 four drives missing
- From: Romulo Albuquerque <romulo.albuquerque@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] raid5: set write hint for PPL
- From: Mariusz Dabrowski <mariusz.dabrowski@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH V15 00/18] block: support multi-page bvec
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH V15 00/18] block: support multi-page bvec
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH V15 00/18] block: support multi-page bvec
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V15 00/18] block: support multi-page bvec
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 : Sequential Write Performance
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] add missing units to --examine
- From: Corey Hickey <bugfood-ml@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 : Sequential Write Performance
- From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH V15 00/18] block: support multi-page bvec
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH V15 00/18] block: support multi-page bvec
- From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V15 00/18] block: support multi-page bvec
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
[Index of Archives]
[Linux RAID Wiki]
[ATA RAID]
[Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]
[Linux Block]
[Linux IDE]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux Hams]
[Device Mapper]
[Kernel]
[Linux Admin]
[Linux Net]
[GFS]
[RPM]
[git]
[Yosemite Forum]
[Linux Networking]