Re: RAID-1 can (sometimes) be 3x faster than RAID-10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Am 30.05.19 um 12:04 schrieb keld@xxxxxxxxxx:
> you need to clarify which layout you use with md raid10.
> the layouts are near, far and offset, with very different performance characteristics.
> far and offset are designed to be faster than near, which I understand that you use.
> So why are you using the slowest md raid10 layout, and not mentioning this fact?

besides that when you install a distribution like Fedora "near" is
default for pure reads it shouldn't be slower than RAID1 at all, just
read from both mirrors of the stripe

"far" has the advantage that it shoukd be even faster than RAID1




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux