Re: Raid 1 vs Raid 5 suggestion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/7/19 11:57 am, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 10.07.19 um 03:28 schrieb Adam Goryachev:
PS, unless you were referring to 3 disk RAID10 as a joke?
exactly

TBH, I really don't understand RAID10, other than improving performance.
For example, in a 10 drive RAID10, you have a higher probability to lose
2 drives that are a "pair" than losing 3 drives in total from a 7 drive
RAID6 (both events lead to total data loss, although potentially you
could recover more "usable" data from the RAID10 array since you would
more likely have a large amount of contiguous data).
RAID10 is about performance *and* redundancy *as well* as storage size

as said: 3 disk RAID10 is a joke and a 3 disk RAID1 is waste of size

3x2 TB RAID1 = 2 TB useable
4x2 TB RAID10 = 4 TB useable

So for the cost of an extra 2TB drive, you got:

1) An extra 2TB capacity - which the OP doesn't need
2) Less data protection, you can only lose a MAXIMUM of 2 disks without losing data, but if you lose the "wrong" 2 disks, then you lost all your data.

Using 4 x 2TB RAID1 (ie, same cost/number of disks) would mean you can lose any 3 disks with no data loss, and when you replace them, quick and simple recovery process. Even 3 x 2TB allows for ANY 2 disk failure without data loss.

The OP stated that performance and capacity was not something that interests him. The primary concern was avoiding the loss of data, presumably due to drive failure, perhaps availability is also important. 2TB is sufficient for 5 years.

Regards,
Adam

--
Adam Goryachev Website Managers www.websitemanagers.com.au
--
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this message
in error, please notify us immediately. Please also destroy and delete the
message from your computer. Viruses - Any loss/damage incurred by receiving
this email is not the sender's responsibility.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux