Re: Raid 1 vs Raid 5 suggestion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/7/19 10:20 am, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 10.07.19 um 01:22 schrieb Adam Goryachev
I'm not sure why I disagree with you Wol... why is RAID10 so much better
than a 3 disk RAID1?
because rebuilds are much faster and a RAID with 3 disks is a joke anyways

Ummm, so a rebuild of a RAID10 with 3 disks is faster than a rebuild of a RAID1 with 3 disks?

The replacement drive will write at 100% of it's speed (as long as we can read from the remaining two disks at least at that speed).

So, the difference is can we read from one of the two remaining disks at the maximum write speed of the third disk in RAID1 x 3? I think the answer would be yes, and therefore the real world difference in rebuild speed would be negligible (if not zero).

Why is a RAID1 with 3 mirrors a joke? It has better data protection from disk loss than RAID10 (with standard 2 disk mirrors), RAID5, or RAID6 (which is excluded here anyway as you need a minimum 4 disks for RAID6).

Actually, I really am curious, because if I'm missing something, I'd like to improve my knowledge and make better decisions in the future.

PS, unless you were referring to 3 disk RAID10 as a joke?

TBH, I really don't understand RAID10, other than improving performance. For example, in a 10 drive RAID10, you have a higher probability to lose 2 drives that are a "pair" than losing 3 drives in total from a 7 drive RAID6 (both events lead to total data loss, although potentially you could recover more "usable" data from the RAID10 array since you would more likely have a large amount of contiguous data).

Regards,
Adam

--
Adam Goryachev Website Managers www.websitemanagers.com.au
--
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this message
in error, please notify us immediately. Please also destroy and delete the
message from your computer. Viruses - Any loss/damage incurred by receiving
this email is not the sender's responsibility.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux