Re: raid6 with dm-integrity should not cause device to fail

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Am 05.09.19 um 21:05 schrieb Robin Hill:
> On Thu Sep 05, 2019 at 12:19:19PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> I don't agree that a heavy hammer is needed in order to send a notification.
>>
> You think that most people using this will be monitoring for
> dm-intergity reported errors? If all the errors are just rewritten
> silently then it's likely the only sign of an issue will be a
> performance impact, with no obvious sign as to where it's coming from

what is the differene mdmonitor trigger an email *before* a disk or
array is completly "spit out" or only "hey, you have lost"

it's up to mdmonitor to do the right thing and people which don't look
and monitor at all are lost anyways - so what's your point?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux