[PATCH 3/3] md: don't call spare_active in md_reap_sync_thread if all member devices can't work

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



When add one disk to array, the md_reap_sync_thread is responsible
to activate the spare and set In_sync flag for the new member in
spare_active().

But if raid1 has one member disk A, and disk B is added to the array.
Then we offline A before all the datas are synchronized from A to B,
obviously B doesn't have the latest data as A, but B is still marked
with In_sync flag.

So let's not call spare_active under the condition, otherwise B is
still showed with 'U' state which is not correct.

Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/md/md.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
index d0223316064d..58015001417d 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -9079,7 +9079,8 @@ void md_reap_sync_thread(struct mddev *mddev)
 	/* resync has finished, collect result */
 	md_unregister_thread(&mddev->sync_thread);
 	if (!test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_INTR, &mddev->recovery) &&
-	    !test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_REQUESTED, &mddev->recovery)) {
+	    !test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_REQUESTED, &mddev->recovery) &&
+	    mddev->degraded != mddev->raid_disks) {
 		/* success...*/
 		/* activate any spares */
 		if (mddev->pers->spare_active(mddev)) {
-- 
2.17.1




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux