[PATCH 1/1] It's wrong to add len to sector_nr in raid10 reshape twice

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In reshape_request it already adds len to sector_nr already. It's wrong to add len to
sector_nr again after adding pages to bio. If there is bad block it can't copy one chunk
at a time, it needs to goto read_more. Now the sector_nr is wrong. It can cause data
corruption.

Signed-off-by: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/md/raid10.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c
index abb5d38..ecef42b 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
@@ -4670,7 +4670,6 @@ static sector_t reshape_request(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t sector_nr,
 	atomic_inc(&r10_bio->remaining);
 	read_bio->bi_next = NULL;
 	generic_make_request(read_bio);
-	sector_nr += nr_sectors;
 	sectors_done += nr_sectors;
 	if (sector_nr <= last)
 		goto read_more;
-- 
2.7.5




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux