Fedora Development Discussion

• Thread Index

• Re: Fedora review tickets tracker pages
  • From: Mattia Verga via devel
• Review requests: perl-Array-IntSpan, commoncpp2
  • From: Sandro Mani
• Fedora review tickets tracker pages
  • From: Mattia Verga via devel
• Fedora-Cloud-31-20200202.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora-Cloud-30-20200202.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Mass rebuild status
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Anitya Upstream Release Monitoring - Dial back Auto-Bugzilla ticket generation
  • From: Chris
• FedoraRespin-31-updates-20200131.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Anitya Upstream Release Monitoring - Dial back Auto-Bugzilla ticket generation
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Anitya Upstream Release Monitoring - Dial back Auto-Bugzilla ticket generation
  • From: Chris
• Re: Anitya Upstream Release Monitoring - Dial back Auto-Bugzilla ticket generation
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Anitya Upstream Release Monitoring - Dial back Auto-Bugzilla ticket generation
  • From: Chris
• Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
  • From: Ken Dreyer
• Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200201.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Fedora-Rawhide-20200201.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora-Cloud-31-20200201.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Dan Čermák
• Re: Strange "directory removed" dependencies in some RPMs
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Self Introduction: Erich Eickmeyer
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: [Retired] gstreamer & gstreamer-plugins-base
  • From: Peter Robinson
• Re: unison can't be compiled in Rawhide
  • From: Tim Jackson
• Re: [Retired] gstreamer & gstreamer-plugins-base
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Fedora-Cloud-30-20200201.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Dan Čermák
• Re: Strange "directory removed" dependencies in some RPMs
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Strange "directory removed" dependencies in some RPMs
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Self Introduction: Erich Eickmeyer
  • From: Bill Chatfield via devel
• Re: Self Introduction: Erich Eickmeyer
  • From: Rahul Sundaram
• Self Introduction: Erich Eickmeyer
  • From: Erich Eickmeyer
• Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Strange "directory removed" dependencies in some RPMs
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Co-Maintainers wanted for Pantheon / elementary apps (Vala / GObject / GTK+)
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL
  • From: Robbie Harwood
• Re: Fedora 31 Network Strangeness
  • From: Steve Dickson
• Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Mass rebuild reminders
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Mass rebuild reminders
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Mass rebuild reminders
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Robbie Harwood
• Re: Mass rebuild reminders
  • From: Jerry James
• Schedule for Mondays's FESCo Meeting (2020-02-03)
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: (ppc64le) ELF load command alignment not page-aligned
  • From: Alejandro Álvarez Ayllón
• Re: (ppc64le) ELF load command alignment not page-aligned
  • From: Dan Horák
• Re: (ppc64le) ELF load command alignment not page-aligned
  • From: Dan Horák
• Re: (ppc64le) ELF load command alignment not page-aligned
  • From: Dan Horák
• Re: (ppc64le) ELF load command alignment not page-aligned
  • From: Tom Hughes
• Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL
  • From: Robbie Harwood
• Re: (ppc64le) ELF load command alignment not page-aligned
  • From: Alejandro Álvarez Ayllón
• Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
  • From: Przemek Klosowski via devel
• Re: (ppc64le) ELF load command alignment not page-aligned
  • From: Dan Horák
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Leigh Griffin
• Re: [security] only latest Qt 5.14.1 has all fixes
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: [security] only latest Qt 5.14.1 has all fixes
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Rahul Sundaram
• Re: (ppc64le) ELF load command alignment not page-aligned
  • From: Jakub Jelinek
• Re: [Retired] gstreamer & gstreamer-plugins-base
  • From: Peter Robinson
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: (ppc64le) ELF load command alignment not page-aligned
  • From: Dan Horák
• Re: epel8: BuildrootError: could not init mock buildroot
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Neal Gompa
• (ppc64le) ELF load command alignment not page-aligned
  • From: Alejandro Álvarez Ayllón
• Re: Fedora 31 Network Strangeness
  • From: Tom Hughes
• Re: Fedora 31 Network Strangeness
  • From: Tom Hughes
• Re: Fedora 31 Network Strangeness
  • From: Steve Dickson
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Michal Konecny
• Re: [Retired] gstreamer & gstreamer-plugins-base
  • From: Felix Schwarz
• Re: Fedora 31 Network Strangeness
  • From: Tom Hughes
• Re: Mass rebuild reminders
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Fedora 31 Network Strangeness
  • From: Steve Dickson
• Re: [Retired] gstreamer & gstreamer-plugins-base
  • From: Michael Catanzaro
• Re: [Retired] gstreamer & gstreamer-plugins-base
  • From: Felix Schwarz
• Re: [Retired] gstreamer & gstreamer-plugins-base
  • From: Tom Callaway
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200131.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: [Retired] gstreamer & gstreamer-plugins-base
  • From: Julen Landa Alustiza
• Re: [Retired] gstreamer & gstreamer-plugins-base
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: [Retired] gstreamer & gstreamer-plugins-base
  • From: Michael Catanzaro
• Fedora-Rawhide-20200131.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: [Retired] gstreamer & gstreamer-plugins-base
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: [Retired] gstreamer & gstreamer-plugins-base
  • From: Michael Catanzaro
• [Retired] gstreamer & gstreamer-plugins-base
  • From: Tom Callaway
• Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Re: Mass rebuild reminders
  • From: Alejandro Álvarez Ayllón
• [Test-Announce] Fedora 32 Rawhide 20200131.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing
  • From: rawhide
• Re: Mass rebuild reminders
  • From: Mohan Boddu
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Mass rebuild reminders
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Fwd: Mass rebuild reminders
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: Mass rebuild reminders
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Fedora notifications bug: 404 Not Found
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• unison can't be compiled in Rawhide
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Fedora-Cloud-31-20200131.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: How to package a web service (nginx vs httpd)
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Felix Schwarz
• How to package a web service (nginx vs httpd)
  • From: Igor Gnatenko
• Fedora-Cloud-30-20200131.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Packages webapp status
  • From: Elliott Sales de Andrade
• Re: mock log output has DOS line endings?
  • From: Pavel Raiskup
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Orcan Ogetbil
• Mass rebuild reminders
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: mock log output has DOS line endings?
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Re: mock log output has DOS line endings?
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: epel8: BuildrootError: could not init mock buildroot
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Fedora notifications bug: 404 Not Found
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Copr Build System - review of 2019 and vote for features in 2020
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Fedora-Cloud-31-20200130.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora-Cloud-30-20200130.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Emmanuel Seyman
• Fedora-Cloud-31-20200129.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora-Cloud-30-20200129.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Randy Barlow
• Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL
  • From: Jeff Fearn
• Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
  • From: Robbie Harwood
• Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Orphaned ldapvi
  • From: Emmanuel Seyman
• Re: review swap , nodejs packages need some updates
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: review swap , nodejs packages need some updates
  • From: Tom Hughes
• Re: review swap , nodejs packages need some updates
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: review swap , nodejs packages need some updates
  • From: Tom Hughes
• Re: review swap , nodejs packages need some updates
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: mock log output has DOS line endings?
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: mock log output has DOS line endings?
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: mock log output has DOS line endings?
  • From: Steven A. Falco
• Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• mock log output has DOS line endings?
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Orphaned ldapvi
  • From: Matěj Cepl
• Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Julen Landa Alustiza
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: epel8: BuildrootError: could not init mock buildroot
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
  • From: Huzaifa Sidhpurwala
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Iñaki Ucar
• Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• epel8: BuildrootError: could not init mock buildroot
  • From: Jiri Kucera
• Re: Orphaned ldapvi
  • From: Emmanuel Seyman
• New mingw-nsis package apparent breakage
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Orphaned ldapvi
  • From: Matěj Cepl
• Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Fedora notifications bug: 404 Not Found
  • From: Tom Hughes
• Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Fedora notifications bug: 404 Not Found
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL
  • From: Vascom
• Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: review swap , nodejs packages need some updates
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Chown checkstyle, checkstyle-maven-plugin, google-http-java-client
  • From: Felix Schwarz
• Chown checkstyle, checkstyle-maven-plugin, google-http-java-client
  • From: Bill Chatfield via devel
• review swap , nodejs packages need some updates
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
  • From: Huzaifa Sidhpurwala
• Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
  • From: Huzaifa Sidhpurwala
• Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Dan Čermák
• Re: [security] only latest Qt 5.14.1 has all fixes
  • From: Damian Ivanov
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Leigh Griffin
• Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Review swaps - practrand - Software package for the Randon number generation & testing
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: How to handle circular build dependencies?
  • From: Markku Korkeala
• Re: How to handle circular build dependencies?
  • From: Markku Korkeala
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Ken Dreyer
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Clement Verna
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Robbie Harwood
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Clement Verna
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Clement Verna
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Iñaki Ucar
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Clement Verna
• Re: [security] only latest Qt 5.14.1 has all fixes
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Leigh Griffin
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Julen Landa Alustiza
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Alex Scheel
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Leigh Griffin
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Randy Barlow
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Julen Landa Alustiza
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Clement Verna
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Damian Ivanov
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Damian Ivanov
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Julen Landa Alustiza
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Remi Collet
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Bill Chatfield via devel
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Clement Verna
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Damian Ivanov
• Re: [security] only latest Qt 5.14.1 has all fixes
  • From: Damian Ivanov
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Iñaki Ucar
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Christophe de Dinechin
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Christophe de Dinechin
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Christophe de Dinechin
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot via devel
• Re: Review swaps (antlr4 reboot)
  • From: Jerry James
• Review swaps - practrand - Software package for the Randon number generation & testing
  • From: Jiri Hladky
• Re: What would it take to drop release and changelog from our spec files? (and do we want to?)
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Leigh Griffin
• Re: What would it take to drop release and changelog from our spec files? (and do we want to?)
  • From: Dan Čermák
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Dan Čermák
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Iñaki Ucar
• Re: [security] only latest Qt 5.14.1 has all fixes
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: [security] only latest Qt 5.14.1 has all fixes
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Robbie Harwood
• Re: [security] only latest Qt 5.14.1 has all fixes
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Leigh Griffin
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Randy Barlow
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Emmanuel Seyman
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: [security] only latest Qt 5.14.1 has all fixes
  • From: Damian Ivanov
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Robbie Harwood
• Re: [security] only latest Qt 5.14.1 has all fixes
  • From: Artem Tim
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Martin Kolman
• [security] only latest Qt 5.14.1 has all fixes
  • From: Damian Ivanov
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Igor Gnatenko
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Adam Saleh
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: How to handle circular build dependencies?
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Fedora Packager Dashboard mockups
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: What would it take to drop release and changelog from our spec files? (and do we want to?)
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: What would it take to drop release and changelog from our spec files? (and do we want to?)
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Mikolaj Izdebski
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Fedora-Cloud-31-20200128.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Iñaki Ucar
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Guido Aulisi
• Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Bubblemail: looking for package maintainer
  • From: Javier Blanco
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Review swaps (antlr4 reboot)
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild
  • From: Vascom
• Re: Java Checkstyle Blocked Even Though Build was Successful
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Java Checkstyle Blocked Even Though Build was Successful
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Unannounced soname bump with samba 4.12~rc1
  • From: Milan Crha
• Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Milan Crha
• Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild
  • From: Mohan Boddu
• Fedora-Cloud-30-20200128.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: swap-on-ZRAM by default
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: [fedora-arm] Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild - fpc bootstrap on aarch64
  • From: Dan Horák
• Review swaps (antlr4 reboot)
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: Java Checkstyle Blocked Even Though Build was Successful
  • From: Scott Talbert
• Java Checkstyle Blocked Even Though Build was Successful
  • From: Bill Chatfield via devel
• [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Team (weekly)
  • From: nils
• Re: Groovy Build Failing Due to Disappearance of groovy-local
  • From: Bill Chatfield via devel
• Re: [fedora-arm] Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild - fpc bootstrap on aarch64
  • From: Artur Iwicki
• List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in a week
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• License change for rust-x11
  • From: Josh Stone
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Bill Chatfield via devel
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: [fedora-arm] Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild - fpc bootstrap on aarch64
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild
  • From: Jeff Law
• Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild
  • From: Artur Iwicki
• Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild
  • From: Dan Horák
• Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild
  • From: Dan Horák
• Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild
  • From: Mohan Boddu
• Re: [fedora-arm] Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild - fpc bootstrap on aarch64
  • From: Dan Horák
• Re: How to handle circular build dependencies?
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Przemek Klosowski via devel
• Re: [fedora-arm] Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild - fpc bootstrap on aarch64
  • From: Artur Iwicki
• Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: [fedora-arm] Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild - fpc bootstrap on aarch64
  • From: Dan Horák
• Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild - fpc bootstrap on aarch64
  • From: Dan Horák
• Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild
  • From: Artur Iwicki
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: swap-on-ZRAM by default
  • From: Rahul Sundaram
• Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild
  • From: Dan Horák
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Emmanuel Seyman
• Re: Let's talk about Fedora in the '20s!
  • From: Jun Aruga
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Mario Torre
• Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild
  • From: Artur Iwicki
• Re: Let's talk about Fedora in the '20s!
  • From: Jun Aruga
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Robbie Harwood
• Intent to build OpenImageIO 2.1.10.1
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Mario Torre
• How to handle circular build dependencies?
  • From: Markku Korkeala
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Robbie Harwood
• Re: Orphaning owncloud and nextcloud
  • From: Michael Cronenworth
• Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild
  • From: Jeff Law
• Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild
  • From: Dan Horák
• Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild
  • From: Jakub Jelinek
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot via devel
• Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild
  • From: Mohan Boddu
• Re: Groovy Build Failing Due to Disappearance of groovy-local
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Alex Scheel
• Zend Framework retired from rawhide
  • From: Remi Collet
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Mario Torre
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot via devel
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200127.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Mario Torre
• Fedora-Rawhide-20200127.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot via devel
• Re: swap-on-ZRAM by default
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Groovy Build Failing Due to Disappearance of groovy-local
  • From: Bill Chatfield via devel
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Tom Hughes
• Re: Groovy Build Failing Due to Disappearance of groovy-local
  • From: Mikolaj Izdebski
• Re: Groovy Build Failing Due to Disappearance of groovy-local
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Non-responsive maintainer: David Dick (ddick)
  • From: Xavier Bachelot
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Groovy Build Failing Due to Disappearance of groovy-local
  • From: Mikolaj Izdebski
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Groovy Build Failing Due to Disappearance of groovy-local
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Groovy Build Failing Due to Disappearance of groovy-local
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Fedora-Cloud-31-20200127.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora-Cloud-30-20200127.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Groovy Build Failing Due to Disappearance of groovy-local
  • From: Bill Chatfield via devel
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Gerald Henriksen
• Re: Unannounced soname bump with botan2-2.13.0
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Bill Chatfield via devel
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Bill Chatfield via devel
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Bill Chatfield via devel
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Bill Chatfield via devel
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Bill Chatfield via devel
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Bill Chatfield via devel
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Bill Chatfield via devel
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Bill Chatfield via devel
• Re: Unannounced soname bump with samba 4.12~rc1
  • From: Alexander Bokovoy
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Felix Schwarz
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Neal Gompa
• golang-github-ajstarks-svgo: notice of license change
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Tom Seewald
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Nico Kadel-Garcia
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Jaroslav Prokop
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Jan Vlug
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Fedora-Rawhide-20200126.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200126.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot via devel
• Fedora-Cloud-31-20200126.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Unannounced soname bump with botan2-2.13.0
  • From: Benjamin Kircher
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: error: error(-30986) getting "???" records from Requirename index:
  • From: Leigh Scott
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot via devel
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Emmanuel Seyman
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot via devel
• error: error(-30986) getting "???" records from Requirename index:
  • From: Cătălin George Feștilă
• Fedora-Cloud-30-20200126.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Samuel Sieb
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Bill Chatfield via devel
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Benson Muite
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Bill Chatfield via devel
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Bill Chatfield via devel
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Alexander Ploumistos
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Ty Young
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Alexander Ploumistos
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Ty Young
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Ty Young
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Bill Chatfield via devel
• Re: Update: AAA replacement login Initiative
  • From: Andrew Lutomirski
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Bill Chatfield via devel
• Unannounced soname bump with samba 4.12~rc1
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Unannounced soname bump with botan2-2.13.0
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Emmanuel Seyman
• Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
  • From: Bill Chatfield via devel
• swap-on-ZRAM by default
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: Bubblemail: looking for package maintainer
  • From: Razer
• Re: Bubblemail: looking for package maintainer
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Re: Fedora 32 system-wide change proposal: reduce installation media size by improving the compression ratio of SquashFS filesystem
  • From: Bohdan Khomutskyi
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200125.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Fedora-Rawhide-20200125.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Update: AAA replacement login Initiative
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Fedora-Cloud-31-20200125.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Please help review these packages (swaps)
  • From: Leigh Scott
• Fedora-Cloud-30-20200125.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Bubblemail: looking for package maintainer
  • From: razer raz
• Re: 1794117 – Disabling support for UDP for NFSv3
  • From: Ian Kent
• Please help review these packages (swaps)
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Re: Let's talk about Fedora in the '20s!
  • From: Renich Bon Ciric
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Michael Catanzaro
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: John Florian
• Fedora-Cloud-31-20200124.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora-Cloud-30-20200124.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Fedora 32 system-wide change proposal: reduce installation media size by improving the compression ratio of SquashFS filesystem
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: Additional buildroot to test x86-64 micro-architecture update
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of
  • From: Steve Grubb
• Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of
  • From: Jeff Law
• Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of
  • From: Steve Grubb
• Re: Fedora 32 system-wide change proposal: reduce installation media size by improving the compression ratio of SquashFS filesystem
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: Update: AAA replacement login Initiative
  • From: Sarah Finn
• Re: cjdns with gcc-10 in Fedora
  • From: Jeff Law
• Re: Copr Build System - review of 2019 and vote for features in 2020
  • From: John M. Harris Jr
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Bruno Wolff III
• Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
  • From: Jakub Jelinek
• Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
  • From: Tom Hughes
• Comaintainer(s) wanted: erofs-utils
  • From: David Michael
• Re: Copr Build System - review of 2019 and vote for features in 2020
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200123.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: Copr Build System - review of 2019 and vote for features in 2020
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Fedora-Rawhide-20200123.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Let's talk about Fedora in the '20s!
  • From: Iñaki Ucar
• Re: 1794117 – Disabling support for UDP for NFSv3
  • From: John M. Harris Jr
• Re: 1794117 – Disabling support for UDP for NFSv3
  • From: John M. Harris Jr
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Jeremy Cline
• Re: Vague proposal: ship prebuilt initramfs images
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Fedora-Cloud-31-20200123.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora-Cloud-30-20200123.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 32 Rawhide 20200122.n.1 nightly compose nominated for testing
  • From: John Reiser
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200122.n.1 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Fedora-Rawhide-20200122.n.1 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• FedoraRespin-31-updates-20200122.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: cjdns with gcc-10 in Fedora
  • From: Jeff Law
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Felix Schwarz
• [Test-Announce] Fedora 32 Rawhide 20200122.n.1 nightly compose nominated for testing
  • From: rawhide
• Orphaning argyllcms
  • From: Richard Hughes
• Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
  • From: Michael Cronenworth
• Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
  • From: Christoph Junghans
• Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
  • From: Christoph Junghans
• 1794117 – Disabling support for UDP for NFSv3
  • From: Steve Dickson
• Re:gcc-10 Fortran argument mismatch issue
  • From: Jeff Law
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Robbie Harwood
• Re: Default bugzilla assignee
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Announcing multi-builds updates gating
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Milan Crha
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Michael Catanzaro
• Default bugzilla assignee
  • From: Randy Barlow
• Re: Announcing multi-builds updates gating
  • From: Martin Kolman
• Re: Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
  • From: Jeff Law
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Michael Catanzaro
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Martin Kolman
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Michael Watters
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Felipe Borges
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Clement Verna
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Ernestas Kulik
• Re: Copr Build System - review of 2019 and vote for features in 2020
  • From: Pavel Raiskup
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Ernestas Kulik
• Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Aleksandra Fedorova
• Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
  • From: Justin Forbes
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Aleksandra Fedorova
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Copr Build System - review of 2019 and vote for features in 2020
  • From: Petr Viktorin
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Aleksandra Fedorova
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Copr Build System - review of 2019 and vote for features in 2020
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Copr Build System - review of 2019 and vote for features in 2020
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Clement Verna
• Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Julen Landa Alustiza
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Aleksandra Fedorova
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: ppc64le builds of Python failing with: Assembler messages: redefined symbol cannot be used on reloc
  • From: Victor Stinner
• Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Clement Verna
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Copr Build System - review of 2019 and vote for features in 2020
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Bubblemail: looking for package maintainer
  • From: Javier Blanco
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Aleksandra Fedorova
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Copr Build System - review of 2019 and vote for features in 2020
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Bubblemail: looking for package maintainer
  • From: Alexander Ploumistos
• Re: Copr Build System - review of 2019 and vote for features in 2020
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Blanket approval for EPEL packages
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• ppc64le builds of Python failing with: Assembler messages: redefined symbol cannot be used on reloc
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Fedora-Cloud-31-20200122.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Several packages looking for new maintainer
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Clement Verna
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Peter Oliver
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Fedora-Cloud-30-20200122.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Copr Build System - review of 2019 and vote for features in 2020
  • From: Pavel Raiskup
• Re: Copr Build System - review of 2019 and vote for features in 2020
  • From: Pavel Raiskup
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Michal Konecny
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Peter Robinson
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: John M. Harris Jr
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Dan Čermák
• Re: Announcing multi-builds updates gating
  • From: Tom Stellard
• Re: coq build failure with OCaml 4.10
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: Vague proposal: ship prebuilt initramfs images
  • From: Matthew Garrett
• Re: qpid-proton removal impact
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Copr Build System - review of 2019 and vote for features in 2020
  • From: Jakub Kadlcik
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Michael Catanzaro
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Alexander Bokovoy
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Peter Robinson
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: John M. Harris Jr
• Re: Fedora 32 system-wide change proposal: reduce installation media size by improving the compression ratio of SquashFS filesystem
  • From: John M. Harris Jr
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Michael Watters
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Felix Schwarz
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Felix Schwarz
• Re: Blanket approval for EPEL packages
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: John M. Harris Jr
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Alex Scheel
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Michael Watters
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Michael Catanzaro
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: John M. Harris Jr
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Alex Scheel
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Leigh Griffin
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Guido Aulisi
• Re: Self Introduction: Philip Matura
  • From: Guido Aulisi
• Re: gcc-10 Fortran argument mismatch issue
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: gcc-10 Fortran argument mismatch issue
  • From: Jakub Jelinek
• Re: Announcing multi-builds updates gating
  • From: Michael Cronenworth
• gcc-10 Fortran argument mismatch issue
  • From: Jeff Law
• Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
  • From: Jeff Law
• Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
  • From: Jeff Law
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Copr in 2020 - summary of votes
  • From: Pavel Raiskup
• Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of
  • From: Jeff Law
• Re: qpid-proton removal impact
  • From: Irina Boverman
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Leigh Griffin
• Re: make 4.3 - F32 or F33?
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: make 4.3 - F32 or F33?
  • From: Neal Gompa
• make 4.3 - F32 or F33?
  • From: DJ Delorie
• Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of
  • From: Jeff Law
• Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of
  • From: Steve Grubb
• Re: FYI: OCaml 4.10.0 beta1 will go into Fedora 32 soonish
  • From: YOUNG, MICHAEL A.
• Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of
  • From: Jeff Law
• Re: Vague proposal: ship prebuilt initramfs images
  • From: Brian C. Lane
• Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
  • From: Peter Robinson
• Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Announcing multi-builds updates gating
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
  • From: Jeff Law
• Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: PostgreSQL 12
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
  • From: Leigh Griffin
• Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
  • From: Steve Grubb
• Re: FYI: OCaml 4.10.0 beta1 will go into Fedora 32 soonish
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: FYI: OCaml 4.10.0 beta1 will go into Fedora 32 soonish
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Copr in 2020 - summary of votes
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Copr in 2020 - summary of votes
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• [modularity] Meeting on Jan 21, 2020 canceled ^z
  • From: Langdon White
• Copr in 2020 - summary of votes
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• [modularity] Meeting Minutes - Jan 14, 2020
  • From: Langdon White
• Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
  • From: Kaleb Keithley
• Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
  • From: Jakub Jelinek
• Re: Vague proposal: ship prebuilt initramfs images
  • From: Matthew Garrett
• Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Vague proposal: ship prebuilt initramfs images
  • From: Matthew Garrett
• Re: Vague proposal: ship prebuilt initramfs images
  • From: Matthew Garrett
• gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Rawhide broken for aarch64 (arm_neon.h)
  • From: Remi Collet
• Rawhide broken for aarch64 (arm_neon.h)
  • From: Remi Collet
• Re: Thank you for a way to requesting/merging side tags on demand.
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Thank you for a way to requesting/merging side tags on demand.
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Thank you for a way to requesting/merging side tags on demand.
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Fedora-Cloud-31-20200121.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Vague proposal: ship prebuilt initramfs images
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: What would it take to drop release and changelog from our spec files? (and do we want to?)
  • From: Pavel Raiskup
• Re: What would it take to drop release and changelog from our spec files? (and do we want to?)
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: What would it take to drop release and changelog from our spec files? (and do we want to?)
  • From: Pavel Raiskup
• Blanket approval for EPEL packages
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: What would it take to drop release and changelog from our spec files? (and do we want to?)
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: What would it take to drop release and changelog from our spec files? (and do we want to?)
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: What would it take to drop release and changelog from our spec files? (and do we want to?)
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: FYI: OCaml 4.10.0 beta1 will go into Fedora 32 soonish
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Thank you for a way to requesting/merging side tags on demand.
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: What would it take to drop release and changelog from our spec files? (and do we want to?)
  • From: Pavel Raiskup
• Fedora-Cloud-30-20200121.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Vague proposal: ship prebuilt initramfs images
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: What would it take to drop release and changelog from our spec files? (and do we want to?)
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: Vague proposal: ship prebuilt initramfs images
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: FYI: OCaml 4.10.0 beta1 will go into Fedora 32 soonish
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• koji status (was Re: FYI: OCaml 4.10.0 beta1 will go into Fedora 32 soonish)
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Team (weekly)
  • From: nils
• Re: Review Swap Request
  • From: Tobias Girstmair
• Re: Vague proposal: ship prebuilt initramfs images
  • From: Dusty Mabe
• Re: Vague proposal: ship prebuilt initramfs images
  • From: Colin Walters
• Vague proposal: ship prebuilt initramfs images
  • From: Matthew Garrett
• Spins marked for retirement
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: Fedora 32 system-wide change proposal: reduce installation media size by improving the compression ratio of SquashFS filesystem
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: Alternative buildroot as a development tool
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Effort to remove libdb
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: What would it take to drop release and changelog from our spec files? (and do we want to?)
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: What would it take to drop release and changelog from our spec files? (and do we want to?)
  • From: David Cantrell
• Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: Update Haskell packages to Stackage LTS 14
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: Python3-rdiff-backup
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: What would it take to drop release and changelog from our spec files? (and do we want to?)
  • From: Nils Philippsen