Re: confused by rpminspect automated test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 8 Mar 2020 10:59:19 +0000
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> for a recent systemd build, the automated tests results showed
> failure [1], and one of the failing tests was
> fedora-ci.koji-build.rpminspect.static-analysis.
> 
> When I click on the label, I get redirected to [2], which is a long
> list of stuff like "print message" and "shell script" and "ci
> notifier". They are all green, and after clicking on one of them to
> unroll it, the display jumps, so it took me a while to figure out
> that the interesting item is one of the "shell scripts". Dunno, when
> doing this a second time I wouldn't be confused so much, but a
> slightly less elaborate UI which makes the failing test result more
> prominent would be nice.
> 
> [1] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-b49f1d9b82
> [2]
> http://fedora-build-checks.apps.ci.centos.org/blue/organizations/jenkins/fedora-rpminspect/detail/fedora-rpminspect/3219/pipeline/
> 
> Anyhoo, getting to the failing test:
> there's a long list of two repeated items:
> 
> [2020-03-06T13:45:51.450Z] rpminspect output for humans - see
> rpminspect.json for full details [2020-03-06T13:45:51.450Z] Overall
> Result: NOT PASSED [2020-03-06T13:45:51.450Z] NOT PASSED items:
> 
> [2020-03-06T13:45:51.450Z]   header-metadata:
> [2020-03-06T13:45:51.450Z]     message: Package Build Host "unused"
> is not within an expected build host subdomain in
> systemd-tests-debuginfo-245-1.fc33.s390x
> [2020-03-06T13:45:51.450Z]     remedy: Make sure the SRPM is built on
> a host within the expected subdomain.
> 
> Seems fully bogus? "unused" might be a placeholder value, but even
> if it wasn't, we have a dedicated server farm to build things.
> As a packager, I don't have any control over the hostname of the
> builder and I shouldn't ever need to care.
> 
> [2020-03-06T13:45:51.451Z]   elf-object-properties:
> [2020-03-06T13:45:51.451Z]
> message: /usr/lib/systemd/tests/test-dhcp-client may use functions
> unsuitable for IPv6 support on s390x [2020-03-06T13:45:51.451Z]
> remedy: Please review all usages of IPv4-only functions and ensure
> IPv6 compliance.
> 
> I understand the sentiment, but what is "functions unsuitable for IPv6
> support on s390x"? I'm not a s390x expert, and the code is using
> general linux apis. Is this message talking about some s390x-specific
> bug? How am I supposed to figure this out, without any function name
> or hint what to look for specifically? (Obviously, in the case of a
> test binary for DHCPv4, it might be fully legitimately using
> IPv4-only constructs…).

FWIW the message is repeat for all arches, so nothing s390x specific
here


		Dan
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux