On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 11:36:33PM +0100, clime wrote: > On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 22:45, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > This would break processing with ‘rpmspec’? > > With just rpmspec, yes. The preproc-rpmspec tool can become a wrapper > around rpmspec aliased prerpmspec essentially doing the preprocessing, > then immediately passing the result to rpmspec for further processing. > Similarly with spectool, wrapper prespectool can be provided. Also this would break fedpkg local, fedpkg srpm, rpmbuild, any process which creates an SRPM, and arbitrary scripts that we run over spec files? If so, it seems like a bad idea to me. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting, bindings from many languages. http://libguestfs.org _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
