Fedora Development Discussion
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: Change proposal discussion - Optimize SquashFS Size
- Change proposal discussion - Optimize SquashFS Size
- Re: Orphaning hibernate
- Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2020-02-03)
- Re: Orphaning hibernate
- From: Bill Chatfield via devel
- Orphaned ini4j
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
- Fedora-Cloud-31-20200203.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
- Re: Anitya Upstream Release Monitoring - Dial back Auto-Bugzilla ticket generation
- Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in a week
- Fedora-Cloud-30-20200203.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Orphaning hibernate
- Re: Mass rebuild status
- [Test-Announce] 2020-02-03 @ 17:00 UTC - Fedora 32 Blocker Review Meeting
- [Test-Announce] 2020-02-03 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- From: Jean-Baptiste Holcroft
- Re: Copr Build System - review of 2019 and vote for features in 2020
- Fedora-Rawhide-20200202.n.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200202.n.0 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- Re: Fedora review tickets tracker pages
- From: Mattia Verga via devel
- Review requests: perl-Array-IntSpan, commoncpp2
- Fedora review tickets tracker pages
- From: Mattia Verga via devel
- Fedora-Cloud-31-20200202.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Fedora-Cloud-30-20200202.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Mass rebuild status
- Re: Anitya Upstream Release Monitoring - Dial back Auto-Bugzilla ticket generation
- FedoraRespin-31-updates-20200131.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: Anitya Upstream Release Monitoring - Dial back Auto-Bugzilla ticket generation
- Re: Anitya Upstream Release Monitoring - Dial back Auto-Bugzilla ticket generation
- Re: Anitya Upstream Release Monitoring - Dial back Auto-Bugzilla ticket generation
- Anitya Upstream Release Monitoring - Dial back Auto-Bugzilla ticket generation
- Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
- Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
- Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
- Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200201.n.0 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- Fedora-Rawhide-20200201.n.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Fedora-Cloud-31-20200201.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Strange "directory removed" dependencies in some RPMs
- Re: Self Introduction: Erich Eickmeyer
- Re: [Retired] gstreamer & gstreamer-plugins-base
- Re: unison can't be compiled in Rawhide
- Re: [Retired] gstreamer & gstreamer-plugins-base
- Fedora-Cloud-30-20200201.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Strange "directory removed" dependencies in some RPMs
- Re: Strange "directory removed" dependencies in some RPMs
- Re: Self Introduction: Erich Eickmeyer
- From: Bill Chatfield via devel
- Re: Self Introduction: Erich Eickmeyer
- Self Introduction: Erich Eickmeyer
- Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
- Strange "directory removed" dependencies in some RPMs
- Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL
- Co-Maintainers wanted for Pantheon / elementary apps (Vala / GObject / GTK+)
- Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL
- Re: Fedora 31 Network Strangeness
- Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL
- Re: Mass rebuild reminders
- Re: Mass rebuild reminders
- Re: Mass rebuild reminders
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Mass rebuild reminders
- Schedule for Mondays's FESCo Meeting (2020-02-03)
- Re: (ppc64le) ELF load command alignment not page-aligned
- From: Alejandro Álvarez Ayllón
- Re: (ppc64le) ELF load command alignment not page-aligned
- Re: (ppc64le) ELF load command alignment not page-aligned
- Re: (ppc64le) ELF load command alignment not page-aligned
- Re: (ppc64le) ELF load command alignment not page-aligned
- Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL
- Re: (ppc64le) ELF load command alignment not page-aligned
- From: Alejandro Álvarez Ayllón
- Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
- From: Przemek Klosowski via devel
- Re: (ppc64le) ELF load command alignment not page-aligned
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: [security] only latest Qt 5.14.1 has all fixes
- Re: [security] only latest Qt 5.14.1 has all fixes
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: (ppc64le) ELF load command alignment not page-aligned
- Re: [Retired] gstreamer & gstreamer-plugins-base
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: (ppc64le) ELF load command alignment not page-aligned
- Re: epel8: BuildrootError: could not init mock buildroot
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- (ppc64le) ELF load command alignment not page-aligned
- From: Alejandro Álvarez Ayllón
- Re: Fedora 31 Network Strangeness
- Re: Fedora 31 Network Strangeness
- Re: Fedora 31 Network Strangeness
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: [Retired] gstreamer & gstreamer-plugins-base
- Re: Fedora 31 Network Strangeness
- Re: Mass rebuild reminders
- Fedora 31 Network Strangeness
- Re: [Retired] gstreamer & gstreamer-plugins-base
- Re: [Retired] gstreamer & gstreamer-plugins-base
- Re: [Retired] gstreamer & gstreamer-plugins-base
- Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200131.n.0 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- Re: [Retired] gstreamer & gstreamer-plugins-base
- From: Julen Landa Alustiza
- Re: [Retired] gstreamer & gstreamer-plugins-base
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: [Retired] gstreamer & gstreamer-plugins-base
- Fedora-Rawhide-20200131.n.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: [Retired] gstreamer & gstreamer-plugins-base
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: [Retired] gstreamer & gstreamer-plugins-base
- [Retired] gstreamer & gstreamer-plugins-base
- Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
- Re: Mass rebuild reminders
- From: Alejandro Álvarez Ayllón
- [Test-Announce] Fedora 32 Rawhide 20200131.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing
- Re: Mass rebuild reminders
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL
- Re: Mass rebuild reminders
- Fwd: Mass rebuild reminders
- Re: Mass rebuild reminders
- Re: Fedora notifications bug: 404 Not Found
- unison can't be compiled in Rawhide
- Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
- Fedora-Cloud-31-20200131.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: How to package a web service (nginx vs httpd)
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- How to package a web service (nginx vs httpd)
- Fedora-Cloud-30-20200131.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Packages webapp status
- From: Elliott Sales de Andrade
- Re: mock log output has DOS line endings?
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- Mass rebuild reminders
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- Re: mock log output has DOS line endings?
- Re: mock log output has DOS line endings?
- Re: epel8: BuildrootError: could not init mock buildroot
- Re: Fedora notifications bug: 404 Not Found
- Re: Copr Build System - review of 2019 and vote for features in 2020
- Fedora-Cloud-31-20200130.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Fedora-Cloud-30-20200130.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- Fedora-Cloud-31-20200129.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Fedora-Cloud-30-20200129.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL
- Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL
- Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
- Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL
- Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL
- Re: Orphaned ldapvi
- Re: review swap , nodejs packages need some updates
- Re: review swap , nodejs packages need some updates
- Re: review swap , nodejs packages need some updates
- Re: review swap , nodejs packages need some updates
- Re: review swap , nodejs packages need some updates
- Re: mock log output has DOS line endings?
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: mock log output has DOS line endings?
- Re: mock log output has DOS line endings?
- Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
- Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
- mock log output has DOS line endings?
- Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
- Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL
- Re: Orphaned ldapvi
- Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL
- Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- From: Julen Landa Alustiza
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: epel8: BuildrootError: could not init mock buildroot
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
- Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
- From: Huzaifa Sidhpurwala
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
- Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- epel8: BuildrootError: could not init mock buildroot
- Re: Orphaned ldapvi
- New mingw-nsis package apparent breakage
- Orphaned ldapvi
- Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- Re: Fedora notifications bug: 404 Not Found
- Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Fedora notifications bug: 404 Not Found
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL
- Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL
- Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL
- Re: review swap , nodejs packages need some updates
- Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
- Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: Chown checkstyle, checkstyle-maven-plugin, google-http-java-client
- Chown checkstyle, checkstyle-maven-plugin, google-http-java-client
- From: Bill Chatfield via devel
- review swap , nodejs packages need some updates
- Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
- From: Huzaifa Sidhpurwala
- Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
- From: Huzaifa Sidhpurwala
- Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- Re: [security] only latest Qt 5.14.1 has all fixes
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
- Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
- RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers
- Re: Review swaps - practrand - Software package for the Randon number generation & testing
- Re: How to handle circular build dependencies?
- Re: How to handle circular build dependencies?
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: [security] only latest Qt 5.14.1 has all fixes
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- From: Julen Landa Alustiza
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- From: Julen Landa Alustiza
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- From: Julen Landa Alustiza
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- From: Bill Chatfield via devel
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- Re: [security] only latest Qt 5.14.1 has all fixes
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- From: Christophe de Dinechin
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- From: Christophe de Dinechin
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- From: Christophe de Dinechin
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- From: Nicolas Mailhot via devel
- Re: Review swaps (antlr4 reboot)
- Review swaps - practrand - Software package for the Randon number generation & testing
- Re: What would it take to drop release and changelog from our spec files? (and do we want to?)
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- From: Robert-André Mauchin
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: What would it take to drop release and changelog from our spec files? (and do we want to?)
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: [security] only latest Qt 5.14.1 has all fixes
- Re: [security] only latest Qt 5.14.1 has all fixes
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- Re: [security] only latest Qt 5.14.1 has all fixes
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- Re: [security] only latest Qt 5.14.1 has all fixes
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- Re: [security] only latest Qt 5.14.1 has all fixes
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- [security] only latest Qt 5.14.1 has all fixes
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild
- Re: How to handle circular build dependencies?
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: Fedora Packager Dashboard mockups
- Re: What would it take to drop release and changelog from our spec files? (and do we want to?)
- Re: What would it take to drop release and changelog from our spec files? (and do we want to?)
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- Fedora-Cloud-31-20200128.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild
- Re: Bubblemail: looking for package maintainer
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- Re: Review swaps (antlr4 reboot)
- Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild
- Re: Java Checkstyle Blocked Even Though Build was Successful
- Re: Java Checkstyle Blocked Even Though Build was Successful
- Re: Unannounced soname bump with samba 4.12~rc1
- Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages
- Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild
- Fedora-Cloud-30-20200128.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: swap-on-ZRAM by default
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: [fedora-arm] Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild - fpc bootstrap on aarch64
- Review swaps (antlr4 reboot)
- Re: Java Checkstyle Blocked Even Though Build was Successful
- Java Checkstyle Blocked Even Though Build was Successful
- From: Bill Chatfield via devel
- [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Team (weekly)
- Re: Groovy Build Failing Due to Disappearance of groovy-local
- From: Bill Chatfield via devel
- Re: [fedora-arm] Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild - fpc bootstrap on aarch64
- List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in a week
- Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
- License change for rust-x11
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- From: Bill Chatfield via devel
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- Re: [fedora-arm] Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild - fpc bootstrap on aarch64
- Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild
- Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild
- Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild
- Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild
- Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild
- Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild
- Re: [fedora-arm] Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild - fpc bootstrap on aarch64
- Re: How to handle circular build dependencies?
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- From: Przemek Klosowski via devel
- Re: [fedora-arm] Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild - fpc bootstrap on aarch64
- Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild
- Re: [fedora-arm] Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild - fpc bootstrap on aarch64
- Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild - fpc bootstrap on aarch64
- Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- Re: swap-on-ZRAM by default
- Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- Re: Let's talk about Fedora in the '20s!
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild
- Re: Let's talk about Fedora in the '20s!
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- Intent to build OpenImageIO 2.1.10.1
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- How to handle circular build dependencies?
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- Re: Orphaning owncloud and nextcloud
- From: Michael Cronenworth
- Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild
- Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild
- Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- From: Nicolas Mailhot via devel
- Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild
- Re: Groovy Build Failing Due to Disappearance of groovy-local
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- Zend Framework retired from rawhide
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- From: Nicolas Mailhot via devel
- Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200127.n.0 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- Fedora-Rawhide-20200127.n.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- From: Nicolas Mailhot via devel
- Re: swap-on-ZRAM by default
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: Groovy Build Failing Due to Disappearance of groovy-local
- From: Bill Chatfield via devel
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- Re: Groovy Build Failing Due to Disappearance of groovy-local
- Re: Groovy Build Failing Due to Disappearance of groovy-local
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- Non-responsive maintainer: David Dick (ddick)
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- Re: Groovy Build Failing Due to Disappearance of groovy-local
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- Re: Groovy Build Failing Due to Disappearance of groovy-local
- Re: Groovy Build Failing Due to Disappearance of groovy-local
- Fedora-Cloud-31-20200127.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Fedora-Cloud-30-20200127.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Groovy Build Failing Due to Disappearance of groovy-local
- From: Bill Chatfield via devel
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- Re: Unannounced soname bump with botan2-2.13.0
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- From: Bill Chatfield via devel
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- From: Bill Chatfield via devel
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- From: Bill Chatfield via devel
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- From: Bill Chatfield via devel
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- From: Bill Chatfield via devel
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- From: Bill Chatfield via devel
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- From: Bill Chatfield via devel
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- From: Bill Chatfield via devel
- Re: Unannounced soname bump with samba 4.12~rc1
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- golang-github-ajstarks-svgo: notice of license change
- From: Robert-André Mauchin
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- Fedora-Rawhide-20200126.n.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200126.n.0 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- From: Nicolas Mailhot via devel
- Fedora-Cloud-31-20200126.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: Unannounced soname bump with botan2-2.13.0
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- Re: error: error(-30986) getting "???" records from Requirename index:
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- From: Nicolas Mailhot via devel
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- From: Nicolas Mailhot via devel
- error: error(-30986) getting "???" records from Requirename index:
- From: Cătălin George Feștilă
- Fedora-Cloud-30-20200126.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- From: Bill Chatfield via devel
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- From: Bill Chatfield via devel
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- From: Bill Chatfield via devel
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- From: Alexander Ploumistos
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- From: Alexander Ploumistos
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- From: Bill Chatfield via devel
- Re: Update: AAA replacement login Initiative
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- From: Bill Chatfield via devel
- Unannounced soname bump with samba 4.12~rc1
- Unannounced soname bump with botan2-2.13.0
- Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
- From: Bill Chatfield via devel
- swap-on-ZRAM by default
- Re: Bubblemail: looking for package maintainer
- Re: Bubblemail: looking for package maintainer
- From: Robert-André Mauchin
- Re: Fedora 32 system-wide change proposal: reduce installation media size by improving the compression ratio of SquashFS filesystem
- Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200125.n.0 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- Fedora-Rawhide-20200125.n.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
- Re: Update: AAA replacement login Initiative
- Fedora-Cloud-31-20200125.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: Please help review these packages (swaps)
- Fedora-Cloud-30-20200125.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: Bubblemail: looking for package maintainer
- Re: 1794117 – Disabling support for UDP for NFSv3
- Please help review these packages (swaps)
- From: Robert-André Mauchin
- Re: Let's talk about Fedora in the '20s!
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Fedora-Cloud-31-20200124.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Fedora-Cloud-30-20200124.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: Fedora 32 system-wide change proposal: reduce installation media size by improving the compression ratio of SquashFS filesystem
- Re: Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: Additional buildroot to test x86-64 micro-architecture update
- Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of
- Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of
- Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of
- Re: Fedora 32 system-wide change proposal: reduce installation media size by improving the compression ratio of SquashFS filesystem
- Re: Update: AAA replacement login Initiative
- Re: cjdns with gcc-10 in Fedora
- Re: Copr Build System - review of 2019 and vote for features in 2020
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
- Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
- Comaintainer(s) wanted: erofs-utils
- Re: Copr Build System - review of 2019 and vote for features in 2020
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
- From: Robert-André Mauchin
- Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200123.n.0 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- Re: Copr Build System - review of 2019 and vote for features in 2020
- Fedora-Rawhide-20200123.n.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: Let's talk about Fedora in the '20s!
- Re: 1794117 – Disabling support for UDP for NFSv3
- Re: 1794117 – Disabling support for UDP for NFSv3
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Vague proposal: ship prebuilt initramfs images
- Fedora-Cloud-31-20200123.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Fedora-Cloud-30-20200123.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 32 Rawhide 20200122.n.1 nightly compose nominated for testing
- Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200122.n.1 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- Fedora-Rawhide-20200122.n.1 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- FedoraRespin-31-updates-20200122.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: cjdns with gcc-10 in Fedora
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- [Test-Announce] Fedora 32 Rawhide 20200122.n.1 nightly compose nominated for testing
- Orphaning argyllcms
- Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
- From: Michael Cronenworth
- Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
- Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
- Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
- 1794117 – Disabling support for UDP for NFSv3
- Re:gcc-10 Fortran argument mismatch issue
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Default bugzilla assignee
- Re: Announcing multi-builds updates gating
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Default bugzilla assignee
- Re: Announcing multi-builds updates gating
- Re: Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Copr Build System - review of 2019 and vote for features in 2020
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- From: Aleksandra Fedorova
- Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- From: Aleksandra Fedorova
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Copr Build System - review of 2019 and vote for features in 2020
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- From: Aleksandra Fedorova
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Copr Build System - review of 2019 and vote for features in 2020
- Re: Copr Build System - review of 2019 and vote for features in 2020
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- From: Julen Landa Alustiza
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- From: Aleksandra Fedorova
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: ppc64le builds of Python failing with: Assembler messages: redefined symbol cannot be used on reloc
- Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Copr Build System - review of 2019 and vote for features in 2020
- Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
- Re: Bubblemail: looking for package maintainer
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- From: Aleksandra Fedorova
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Copr Build System - review of 2019 and vote for features in 2020
- Re: Bubblemail: looking for package maintainer
- From: Alexander Ploumistos
- Re: Copr Build System - review of 2019 and vote for features in 2020
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Blanket approval for EPEL packages
- ppc64le builds of Python failing with: Assembler messages: redefined symbol cannot be used on reloc
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Fedora-Cloud-31-20200122.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Several packages looking for new maintainer
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Fedora-Cloud-30-20200122.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: Copr Build System - review of 2019 and vote for features in 2020
- Re: Copr Build System - review of 2019 and vote for features in 2020
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Announcing multi-builds updates gating
- Re: coq build failure with OCaml 4.10
- Re: Vague proposal: ship prebuilt initramfs images
- Re: qpid-proton removal impact
- Re: Copr Build System - review of 2019 and vote for features in 2020
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Fedora 32 system-wide change proposal: reduce installation media size by improving the compression ratio of SquashFS filesystem
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Blanket approval for EPEL packages
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- From: Robert-André Mauchin
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Self Introduction: Philip Matura
- Re: gcc-10 Fortran argument mismatch issue
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: gcc-10 Fortran argument mismatch issue
- Re: Announcing multi-builds updates gating
- From: Michael Cronenworth
- gcc-10 Fortran argument mismatch issue
- Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
- Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: Copr in 2020 - summary of votes
- Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of
- Re: qpid-proton removal impact
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: make 4.3 - F32 or F33?
- Re: make 4.3 - F32 or F33?
- make 4.3 - F32 or F33?
- Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of
- Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of
- Re: FYI: OCaml 4.10.0 beta1 will go into Fedora 32 soonish
- Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of
- Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of
- Re: Vague proposal: ship prebuilt initramfs images
- Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
- Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Announcing multi-builds updates gating
- Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
- Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: PostgreSQL 12
- Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
- Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
- Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
- Re: FYI: OCaml 4.10.0 beta1 will go into Fedora 32 soonish
- Re: FYI: OCaml 4.10.0 beta1 will go into Fedora 32 soonish
- Re: Copr in 2020 - summary of votes
- Re: Copr in 2020 - summary of votes
- [modularity] Meeting on Jan 21, 2020 canceled ^z
- Copr in 2020 - summary of votes
- [modularity] Meeting Minutes - Jan 14, 2020
- Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
- Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
- Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
- Re: Vague proposal: ship prebuilt initramfs images
- Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
- Re: Vague proposal: ship prebuilt initramfs images
- Re: Vague proposal: ship prebuilt initramfs images
- gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...
- Re: Rawhide broken for aarch64 (arm_neon.h)
- Rawhide broken for aarch64 (arm_neon.h)
- Re: Thank you for a way to requesting/merging side tags on demand.
- Re: Thank you for a way to requesting/merging side tags on demand.
- Re: Thank you for a way to requesting/merging side tags on demand.
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Fedora-Cloud-31-20200121.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: Vague proposal: ship prebuilt initramfs images
- Re: What would it take to drop release and changelog from our spec files? (and do we want to?)
- Re: What would it take to drop release and changelog from our spec files? (and do we want to?)
- Re: What would it take to drop release and changelog from our spec files? (and do we want to?)
- Blanket approval for EPEL packages
- Re: What would it take to drop release and changelog from our spec files? (and do we want to?)
- Re: What would it take to drop release and changelog from our spec files? (and do we want to?)
- Re: What would it take to drop release and changelog from our spec files? (and do we want to?)
- Re: FYI: OCaml 4.10.0 beta1 will go into Fedora 32 soonish
- Thank you for a way to requesting/merging side tags on demand.
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Announce]
[Fedora Testing]
[Fedora Legacy Announce]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Security]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]