On Tue, 2020-02-25 at 17:45 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 25. 02. 20 15:27, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Side note: I've been meaning to propose dropping Epoch because of
> > this
> > "we don't care about upgrade path anymore", but I've not gotten
> > around
> > to do that yet
We still need Epoch to have the ability to back-pedal on a
(hypothetical) horribly broken version update in a stable release which
wasn't caught during testing.
> Unfortunately, that breaks rawhide users.
Well, if we officially were to break with the upgrade path constraints,
we'd have to document this. While we're at it, we should then document
that Rawhide users should use "dnf distro-sync".
Nils
--
Nils Philippsen "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to
Software Engineer purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither
Red Hat Liberty nor Safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759
PGP fingerprint: D0C1 1576 CDA6 5B6E BBAE 95B2 7D53 7FCA E9F6 395D
old: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
