Re: Non-responsive maintainer: pocock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



W dniu 06.03.2020 o 19:21, Daniel Pocock pisze:


On 05/03/2020 21:26, Julian Sikorski wrote:

I would like to take this opportunity to remind about the PR that I have
prepared - let us not duplicate the work:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/asio/pull-request/1
I have rebuilt all asio's dependencies and only encountered issues with
abiword and OpenSceneGraph - both were complaining about error not being
a member of asio::placeholders. Same issues were found by gentoo, I have
linked the relevant bug reports in the PR. Is this something you would
be able to advise about? I am happy to share full build logs if needed.

I haven't personally looked at asio 1.14.0 yet so I don't have the
solution off the top of my head.  These are the type of issues I
normally deal with in upstream development.

 From a strategic perspective, I feel it is most efficient to try and
coordinate with the upstreams and other distributions so that everybody
is supporting the same asio in each of the major distributions.

In any C++ library, there are small API changes from time to time
leading to the type of problem you describe.
> If upstreams are using travis-ci, we are testing against version 1.12.2
from Debian/Ubuntu and may not be aware of issues in asio 1.14.0.  Even
if you patch for the issue, it may be completely untested upstream.
That is why it is so vital to resolve the Debian/Ubuntu lag.

I do not know what Debian's issues regarding update to 1.14.0 were, but from what you are saying it appears someone at Debian lost their cool. In any case, Fedora is a more bleeding edge distro than Debian/Ubuntu (First one of the foundations), so I am not sure how realistic it is to be waiting for Debian/Ubuntu to include something before we can do it in Fedora. I was able to fix abiword completely by adding -DASIO_ENABLE_BOOST to CXXFLAGS, OSG still fails further down the line due to get_io_service() having been removed. I have filed upstream issues for both projects, details in the PR.

Is there a convenient way for upstreams to make CI builds on the latest
Fedora rawhide in parallel with our travis-ci Ubuntu builds?

I am not aware of a ci service using Fedora, both appveyor and travis appear to be using ubuntu.

Please also note that I have checked both fale and uwog's recent
activity with fedora-active-user and neither seem to have been active
lately.

Thanks for this feedback.  Dakota, do you want to be promoted to admin
on asio?

Is either of you happy to be co-maintainer of resiprocate with me?  I
opened an issue to unretire it.  I do upstream releases and I run the
latest version for fedrtc.org (using CentOS/EPEL) so it is important for
me that it supports Fedora and any Fedora issues are given the attention
they deserve during the release process.

Regards,

Daniel

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux