On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 8:21 AM Sandro Mani <manisandro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 24.02.20 14:14, Neal Gompa wrote: > > You can do that trick, it'll even kind of work. But we don't typically > > do this. That said, why not just patch it to remove the non-free > > dependency, even if it weakens the functionality a bit? > I suppose licensecheck is mostly used for package reviews, so it might > be a bit delicate to have it misreport licenses. But removing the dependency just restores it to the level of accuracy it had before the introduction of that dependency. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
