Thanks a lot for clarification! On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 15:26 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 05. 03. 20 15:21, jkonecny@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > Thanks for reply, see my answers inline. > > > > On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 10:26 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > On 05. 03. 20 9:12, jkonecny@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > > > I'm co-maintaining package of kakoune and this package have > > > > failing > > > > build on F32 and Rawhide because of tests. > > > > > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1799560 > > > > > > > > As you can see in the last comment there is an upstream bug on > > > > gcc- > > > > 10 > > > > which is blocking the package tests. > > > > > > > > What I want to know is what should be my next steps right now. > > > > > > > > - Should I create bugzilla on Fedora side on gcc and block my > > > > bug > > > > on > > > > this bug? > > > > > > You can. You don't need to. > > > > I'll follow Daniels answer so I'll create the bug that Fedora > > maintainer of gcc, so they can look on that and know that it's > > blocking > > my package. > > That was good advice. > > > > > - Should I disable those tests? > > > > > > You can. You don't need to, unless you need to rebuild the > > > package > > > for some reason. > > > > Isn't new gcc version requirement for rebuild? > > Strictly speaking, no. Evetually, you'll need to rebuild this once. > But you > don't need to make it a top priority at this moment, unless it is > blocking some > other packages or an update you want or a security fix, etc... > > > > > - Should I wait if gcc-10 upstream will solve this issue in > > > > time > > > > for > > > > F32? > > > > > > You can. Or they can solve it later. > > > > Wouldn't that mean that kakoune package won't be present in F32? > > Maybe > > I'm miss-understanding the issue here but if it won't compile with > > new > > gcc it will have different ABI than rest of the F32 apps so it > > basically can't be used there? > > It is present in Fedora 32. It should work, unless the executables > and shared > object files produced by gcc 10 cannot work with stuff compiled by > gcc 9 (that > would be very bad). > > > > > - Should I propose Fedora 32 blocker because of the bug in gcc? > > > > > > Why would you do that? How is Fedora 32 broken if we release it > > > with > > > kakoune not > > > rebuilt yet? Is this FTBFS blocking other libraries from being > > > updated as > > > planned for Fedora 32? > > > > If this is not that serious issue and it's affecting only my > > package > > than it's fine I guess. > > It is fine. > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
