Re: GCC-10 is blocking tests on my package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05. 03. 20 15:21, jkonecny@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Thanks for reply, see my answers inline.

On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 10:26 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 05. 03. 20 9:12, jkonecny@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hello everyone,

I'm co-maintaining package of kakoune and this package have failing
build on F32 and Rawhide because of tests.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1799560

As you can see in the last comment there is an upstream bug on gcc-
10
which is blocking the package tests.

What I want to know is what should be my next steps right now.

- Should I create bugzilla on Fedora side on gcc and block my bug
on
this bug?

You can. You don't need to.

I'll follow Daniels answer so I'll create the bug that Fedora
maintainer of gcc, so they can look on that and know that it's blocking
my package.

That was good advice.

- Should I disable those tests?

You can. You don't need to, unless you need to rebuild the package
for some reason.

Isn't new gcc version requirement for rebuild?

Strictly speaking, no. Evetually, you'll need to rebuild this once. But you don't need to make it a top priority at this moment, unless it is blocking some other packages or an update you want or a security fix, etc...

- Should I wait if gcc-10 upstream will solve this issue in time
for
F32?

You can. Or they can solve it later.

Wouldn't that mean that kakoune package won't be present in F32? Maybe
I'm miss-understanding the issue here but if it won't compile with new
gcc it will have different ABI than rest of the F32 apps so it
basically can't be used there?

It is present in Fedora 32. It should work, unless the executables and shared object files produced by gcc 10 cannot work with stuff compiled by gcc 9 (that would be very bad).

- Should I propose Fedora 32 blocker because of the bug in gcc?

Why would you do that? How is Fedora 32 broken if we release it with
kakoune not
rebuilt yet? Is this FTBFS blocking other libraries from being
updated as
planned for Fedora 32?

If this is not that serious issue and it's affecting only my package
than it's fine I guess.

It is fine.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux