Re: Include non-RPM content in buildroot

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 10:11:47 -0500, Randy Barlow wrote:
> On 2/21/20 9:57 AM, Martin Sehnoutka wrote:
> > Every time there is a new release it would automatically synchronize our
> > own Fedora-specific registry, which would in turn be accessible in
> > buildroot.
> 
> One thing that comes to my mind with this proposal is that we still need
> some way to vet licenses. Today, this is done via the package review
> process, and in my mind is the primary purpose of package review. If we
> started having upstream compatible registries, I suppose we could introduce
> a review process for adding packages to the registries to solve this
> concern.

Vetting of licenses is only one aspect of the review but not its sole
purpose. Apart from all the other checks to ensure that the software
follows current best practices in software development, we also verify
the correctness of the software during the review.

-- 
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux