On Wed, 2020-02-26 at 11:29 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote:
> Le 2020-02-26 11:14, Nils Philippsen a écrit :
>
> > Well, if we officially were to break with the upgrade path
> > constraints,
> > we'd have to document this. While we're at it, we should then
> > document
> > that Rawhide users should use "dnf distro-sync".
>
> That won’t work because (for example) rawhide is pulling forward
> *right*
> *now*, while F32 is not finished, so you have a *huge* time windows
> during which there is nothing to distro-sync with, and you still need
> to
> keep compat between rawhide and future-stable numbering.
Heh, I wasn't volunteering to push this. If you ask me, we should stick
with having a clean upgrade path.
Nils
--
Nils Philippsen "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to
Software Engineer purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither
Red Hat Liberty nor Safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759
PGP fingerprint: D0C1 1576 CDA6 5B6E BBAE 95B2 7D53 7FCA E9F6 395D
old: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
