On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 10:48 AM Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 2020-03-06 at 18:07 +0100, jeandet wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I did an upgrade last week, with: > > sudo dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=32 > > Except for modules everything was ok on my laptop, but I got some > > issues on my desktop. > > On my laptop, from fc32 running: > > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > sudo dnf --releasever=32 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f32 \ > > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ > > distro-sync > > did solve the modules warnings. > > > > > > On my desktop: > > > > "/dev/disk/by-uuid" wasn't and still isn't populated with soft raid > > volumes, I had to change fstab to point to /dev/mdXXXpX to mount my > > home and other needed folders. From cockpit it also says "Unrecognized > > Data" for all my mdraid partitions. > > > > I didn't have time to investigate more, so I jump into this mail to ask > > against which package should I report a bug? I have no idea who fills > > "/dev/disk/by-uuid". > > systemd (well, udev, which is part of systemd these days). It should be > done by /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/60-persistent-storage.rules , which is > part of systemd-udev. I wonder if it's possibly an issue that that runs > before /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/65-md-incremental.rules , but I'm just > guessing there... Maybe related? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809117 -- Chris Murphy _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
