On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 14:52 +0000, Artur Iwicki wrote: > I couldn't find an answer in the Packaging Guidelines, so I'm writing > here. > > My question is as follows: looking at the various icon-theme packages > in Fedora, they seem to adhere to the following directory hierarchy: > - 16x16 > > - apps > > - emblems > > - (other categories) > - 32x32 > > - (categories) > - (other sizes) > > However, looking through some icon packs on the Internet, many > authors use the following hierarchy instead: > - apps > > - 16px > > - 32px > > - (other sizes) > - mimetypes > > - (sizes) > - (other categories) > > Is there any kind of preference in Fedora for the first option, so > that one should move the files around to match it, or should the > directory hierarchy be left they way upstream does it? I guess since > the "index.theme" file lists all the paths, it doesn't matter from a > technical standpoint, but I still thought it'd be better to ask. https://specifications.freedesktop.org/icon-theme-spec/icon-theme-spec-latest.html#directory_layout I think the only thing that matters is the theme index file, which lists out all the directories: https://specifications.freedesktop.org/icon-theme-spec/icon-theme-spec-latest.html#icon_lookup -- Ernestas Kulik Software Engineer Base Operating Systems - Core Services - ABRT Red Hat Czech, s.r.o. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
